limit of trim = limit of travel?

On May 6, 3:36*pm, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
WingFlaps wrote :





On May 6, 2:19*am, Bertie the Bunyip
wrote:
On May 5, 6:06*am, WingFlaps wrote:

On May 5, 8:48*am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:

WingFlaps wrote
innews:49efc4b4-8ede-40cd-9ad3-5
:

On May 5, 3:19*am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Stealth Pilot wrote
innews:u8kr141dp0o1e
:

On Fri, 2 May 2008 12:32:28 -0700 (PDT), WingFlaps
wrote:

On May 3, 12:40*am, Stealth Pilot

.au
wrote:
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 00:12:54 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the
Bunyip wrote:

WingFlaps wrote in
news:ad8fc9c9-57cb-4733-9e97-
:

On Apr 30, 9:37*am, wrote:
On Apr 29, 2:24 pm, WingFlaps
wrote:

I don't follow this. The trim surface operates in
the opposite direction to the trimmed surface and
takes area away from it.

-------------------------------------------------------------





----

^^^
^
Explain
please?

What area stuff?

Cheers

that area stuff. ...which shows a total lack of aerodynamic
understanding.

Still don't know what you're talking about! Most of that
thread has

spooled off my main server now..

He's trolling.

Cheers

He's not, he's right. Deflecting a tab in the oppostie direction
doesn
't
remove area.

It reduces effective area.

No, it doesn´t. The area is stil there. The tab isn´t "hiding"
because

it´s going the other way, it´s just doing something different. it may
be reducing the effectiveness of the surface, but that isn´t the same
thing as reducing the area.

Nope. Effectiveness is proportional to area -from the old lift
equation.

Sure, but the area hasn't changed.


Don't be so literal, how could the actual sq feet chnage? BUT it's as
if the effective area at the AOA of the stabilator is reduced -right?

Cheers

WingFlaps wrote in
:

On May 6, 3:36*pm, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
WingFlaps wrote
innews:4c947801-0112-4fa1-92e7-09f00
:





On May 6, 2:19*am, Bertie the Bunyip
wrote:
On May 5, 6:06*am, WingFlaps wrote:

On May 5, 8:48*am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:

WingFlaps wrote
innews:49efc4b4-8ede-40cd-9ad3-5
:

On May 5, 3:19*am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Stealth Pilot wrote
innews:u8kr141dp0o1e
:

On Fri, 2 May 2008 12:32:28 -0700 (PDT), WingFlaps
wrote:

On May 3, 12:40*am, Stealth Pilot

.au
wrote:
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 00:12:54 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the
Bunyip wrote:

WingFlaps wrote in
news:ad8fc9c9-57cb-4733-9e97-
:

On Apr 30, 9:37*am,
wrote:
On Apr 29, 2:24 pm, WingFlaps
wrote:

I don't follow this. The trim surface operates in
the opposite direction to the trimmed surface and
takes area away from it.

-------------------------------------------------------------





----

^^^
^
Explain
please?

What area stuff?

Cheers

that area stuff. ...which shows a total lack of
aerodynamic understanding.

Still don't know what you're talking about! Most of that
thread has

spooled off my main server now..

He's trolling.

Cheers

He's not, he's right. Deflecting a tab in the oppostie
direction doesn
't
remove area.

It reduces effective area.

No, it doesn´t. The area is stil there. The tab isn´t "hiding"
because

it´s going the other way, it´s just doing something different. it
m
ay
be reducing the effectiveness of the surface, but that isn´t the
same

thing as reducing the area.

Nope. Effectiveness is proportional to area -from the old lift
equation.

Sure, but the area hasn't changed.


Don't be so literal, how could the actual sq feet chnage? BUT it's as
if the effective area at the AOA of the stabilator is reduced -right?


No.



bertie