I give up, after many, many years!

Im gonna beg to differ with this one. A year ago or so I answered one
of his posts , which I ussually dont do, that had something to do with
airliners and balanced field length. He wrote back that I was wrong
and some theory that since pilots fly airliners into terain their
answers cannot be trusted. And I was polite to the guy ! (You are the
only one I call names on this list )
Frank

"Frank, you ignorant slut. The only abortion I would have approved of
would've been on your mother, when she was pregnant with you..."

(My apologies to Saturday Night Live, circa 1975, Dan Akroyd vs. Jane
Curtin)

:-)

Anywho, I'm not saying MX is right, nor am I saying he's not necessarily a
troll, in the classic sense of the word. I *am* saying he's primarily
on-topic, occasionally asks really good questions, and is never overtly
rude.

In this forum, nowadays, that's as good as it gets.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"

"Jay Honeck" wrote in
news:XqXWj.164975$yE1.105992@attbi_s21:

Im gonna beg to differ with this one. A year ago or so I answered one
of his posts , which I ussually dont do, that had something to do with
airliners and balanced field length. He wrote back that I was wrong
and some theory that since pilots fly airliners into terain their
answers cannot be trusted. And I was polite to the guy ! (You are the
only one I call names on this list )
Frank

"Frank, you ignorant slut. The only abortion I would have approved of
would've been on your mother, when she was pregnant with you..."

(My apologies to Saturday Night Live, circa 1975, Dan Akroyd vs. Jane
Curtin)

:-)

Anywho, I'm not saying MX is right, nor am I saying he's not
necessarily a troll, in the classic sense of the word. I *am* saying
he's primarily on-topic, occasionally asks really good questions, and
is never overtly rude.

In this forum, nowadays, that's as good as it gets.

You're a stupid fjukkwad.


Bertie

On Thu, 15 May 2008 14:05:43 GMT, "Jay Honeck"
wrote:

Im gonna beg to differ with this one. A year ago or so I answered one
of his posts , which I ussually dont do, that had something to do with
airliners and balanced field length. He wrote back that I was wrong
and some theory that since pilots fly airliners into terain their
answers cannot be trusted. And I was polite to the guy ! (You are the
only one I call names on this list )
Frank

"Frank, you ignorant slut. The only abortion I would have approved of
would've been on your mother, when she was pregnant with you..."

(My apologies to Saturday Night Live, circa 1975, Dan Akroyd vs. Jane
Curtin)

:-)

Anywho, I'm not saying MX is right, nor am I saying he's not necessarily a
troll, in the classic sense of the word. I *am* saying he's primarily
on-topic, occasionally asks really good questions, and is never overtly
rude.

In this forum, nowadays, that's as good as it gets.

Jay, honestly you are a dunce.
Mx is one of the most amazing slow learners in history.
most of his supposedly "interesting" questions come from such a
profound lack of any real understanding that it amazes me that he
continues to breathe.
you are both in the idiot brigade.

Stealth Pilot

"Stealth Pilot" wrote in message

Jay, honestly you are a dunce.
Mx is one of the most amazing slow learners in history.

She's not really a slow learner. She just will not admit when she is wrong.
There are times when she will make an incredibly ignorant remark, goes head
to head with anyone attempting to correct her, yet stops making the same
ignorant statement.

She doesn't post here to learn. She is posting here to ''try to compel us to
whing for ourselves'. Her self-portrait on wikipedia really explains this:

"I like to engage people in discussions when I detect that they cling to
opinions that they are unable to defend (opinions based on emotion, opinions
adopted wholesale from others, etc.), in order to try to compel them to
think for themselves."

She also admits to using "language intended by its author to produce
inflammatory reactions." This was after calling light aircraft tin-cans.

It is fun to point out her incorrect statements and watch her backpeddal.

There is a word that describes her perfectly. Five letters, starts with a T.

whing - think

"Steve Foley" wrote in message
news:R8zYj.3270$Zy1.781@trndny05...
"Stealth Pilot" wrote in message

Jay, honestly you are a dunce.
Mx is one of the most amazing slow learners in history.

She's not really a slow learner. She just will not admit when she is
wrong.
There are times when she will make an incredibly ignorant remark, goes
head
to head with anyone attempting to correct her, yet stops making the same
ignorant statement.

She doesn't post here to learn. She is posting here to ''try to compel us
to
whing for ourselves'. Her self-portrait on wikipedia really explains this:

"I like to engage people in discussions when I detect that they cling to
opinions that they are unable to defend (opinions based on emotion,
opinions
adopted wholesale from others, etc.), in order to try to compel them to
think for themselves."

She also admits to using "language intended by its author to produce
inflammatory reactions." This was after calling light aircraft tin-cans.

It is fun to point out her incorrect statements and watch her backpeddal.

There is a word that describes her perfectly. Five letters, starts with a
T.

"Steve Foley" wrote in
news:R8zYj.3270$Zy1.781@trndny05:

"Stealth Pilot" wrote in message

Jay, honestly you are a dunce.
Mx is one of the most amazing slow learners in history.

She's not really a slow learner. She just will not admit when she is
wrong. There are times when she will make an incredibly ignorant
remark, goes head to head with anyone attempting to correct her, yet
stops making the same ignorant statement.

She doesn't post here to learn. She is posting here to ''try to compel
us to whing for ourselves'. Her self-portrait on wikipedia really
explains this:

"I like to engage people in discussions when I detect that they cling
to opinions that they are unable to defend (opinions based on emotion,
opinions adopted wholesale from others, etc.), in order to try to
compel them to think for themselves."

She also admits to using "language intended by its author to produce
inflammatory reactions." This was after calling light aircraft
tin-cans.

It is fun to point out her incorrect statements and watch her
backpeddal.

There is a word that describes her perfectly. Five letters, starts
with a T.



Pretty sure the fem lames aren't going to do too much damage to someone
who is proud of being asexual..



Bertie

"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message

Pretty sure the fem lames aren't going to do too much damage to someone
who is proud of being asexual..


He/She/It has denied being Anthony Atkielski, so we really have no way to
tell.

1) Anthony Atkielski published a blog (aprenta.blogspot.com)

2) MX denies having ever written a blog

Therefore MX denies being Anthony Atlielski

"Steve Foley" wrote in news:YwzYj.3273
$Zy1.1619@trndny05:

"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message

Pretty sure the fem lames aren't going to do too much damage to
someone
who is proud of being asexual..


He/She/It has denied being Anthony Atkielski, so we really have no way
to
tell.

1) Anthony Atkielski published a blog (aprenta.blogspot.com)

2) MX denies having ever written a blog

Therefore MX denies being Anthony Atlielski



Ah, OK. Fair enough!


Bertie

"Steve Foley" wrote in message
news:YwzYj.3273$Zy1.1619@trndny05...

He/She/It has denied being Anthony Atkielski, so we really have no way to
tell.

1) Anthony Atkielski published a blog (aprenta.blogspot.com)

2) MX denies having ever written a blog

Therefore MX denies being Anthony Atlielski


And with the proven desire both Bertie and his ilk (recruited by constant
cross posting), has shown in forging identities, Bertie's influence on the
noise level of this group is really the only thing we can be sure of.

I wouldn't be the least bit surprised of MX's recent postings were not
forgeries by Bertie & Co, since he has such a hard time getting attention
otherwise.

"Maxwell" luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote in
:


"Steve Foley" wrote in message
news:YwzYj.3273$Zy1.1619@trndny05...

He/She/It has denied being Anthony Atkielski, so we really have no
way to tell.

1) Anthony Atkielski published a blog (aprenta.blogspot.com)

2) MX denies having ever written a blog

Therefore MX denies being Anthony Atlielski


And with the proven desire both Bertie and his ilk (recruited by
constant cross posting), has shown in forging identities, Bertie's
influence on the noise level of this group is really the only thing we
can be sure of.

As long as i have you anyway!


I wouldn't be the least bit surprised of MX's recent postings were not
forgeries by Bertie & Co, since he has such a hard time getting
attention otherwise.


I don't forge, fjukkwit.

Put up or shut up.


If i've forged you and Databasix has ignored your protests, then
news.admin.net-abuse.usenet is the place you should be shrieking about it.
Databasix and/or Altopia would get a usenet death penalty and I'd be SOL
for usenet access.

So, if you're going to level forgery accusations you had better be prepared
to back them up.

Put up or shut up, asshole.



Bertie