Mxsmanic , IFR sensations, and some other stuff

A Lieberman brought next idea :
I absolutely agree based on time and time again history, that any
feelings in the head absolutely has to be ignored, instruments are
there for that, but for verification of power adjustments, I see no
reason why AS A TOOL, the feeling in your rear end cannot be used as a
verification of the reaction of your actioin (adding or reducing
power).

The problem with feelings is that no two sets of feelers feel with the
same feeling. lol Then there are the sets of feelings that are felt
that are not consciously felt in terms of being able to explain them.

The discussion can be both descriptive and indescriptive unless it is
abouit what actions can or cannot be applied to your sets of feelings.

Why do I feel like singing out loud with Barbra Streisand?

"Gezellig" wrote ...
Why do I feel like singing out loud with Barbra Streisand?


That could be considered Medically disqualifying !!!
;-)

Mike Isaksen has brought this to us :
"Gezellig" wrote ...
Why do I feel like singing out loud with Barbra Streisand?


That could be considered Medically disqualifying !!!
;-)

I recant to David Bowie. Which may continue my disqualification. :'(

On May 19, 12:48 am, Gezellig wrote:
Mike Isaksen has brought this to us :

"Gezellig" wrote ...
Why do I feel like singing out loud with Barbra Streisand?

That could be considered Medically disqualifying !!!
;-)

I recant to David Bowie. Which may continue my disqualification. :'(

Turn and face the strange.

On May 18, 10:42*pm, Gezellig wrote:
A Lieberman brought next idea :

The problem with feelings is that no two sets of feelers feel with the
same feeling. lol Then there are the sets of feelings that are felt
that are not consciously felt in terms of being able to explain them.

ABSOLUTELY AGREE. And when that happens, instruments MUST be
trusted.

It's the absence of an EXPECTED feeling that should question the
validity of instrumentation.

In my case, and SUDDEN extreme pitch up displayed on my AI, I should
have expected positive G's in the seat of my pants. I did not get
that, therefore me flagging the AI and starting my cross check to my
secondary instruments for troubleshooting.

on 5/19/2008, A Lieberman supposed :
On May 18, 10:42*pm, Gezellig wrote:
A Lieberman brought next idea :

The problem with feelings is that no two sets of feelers feel with the
same feeling. lol Then there are the sets of feelings that are felt
that are not consciously felt in terms of being able to explain them.

ABSOLUTELY AGREE. And when that happens, instruments MUST be
trusted.

It's the absence of an EXPECTED feeling that should question the
validity of instrumentation.

In my case, and SUDDEN extreme pitch up displayed on my AI, I should
have expected positive G's in the seat of my pants. I did not get
that, therefore me flagging the AI and starting my cross check to my
secondary instruments for troubleshooting.

Sensory inputs are checkpoints.

I see
I feel
I see
I see more
I resolve to what I see.

Basic piloting, best constrained and confirmed to the sciences of
engineering and physics. This is what I struggle the most, I am neither
physicist, mathmetician or engineering inclined. :-? I flunked Legos.
:')

seniours pass dunce 101 you didn't!
Gezellig laid this down on his screen :
Sensory inputs are checkpoints.

I see
I feel
I see
I see more
I resolve to what I see.

Basic piloting, best constrained and confirmed to the sciences of engineering
and physics. This is what I struggle the most, I am neither physicist,
mathmetician or engineering inclined. :-? I flunked Legos. :')

Gezellig brought next idea :
seniours pass dunce 101 you didn't!
Gezellig laid this down on his screen :
Sensory inputs are checkpoints.

I see
I feel
I see
I see more
I resolve to what I see.

Basic piloting, best constrained and confirmed to the sciences of
engineering and physics. This is what I struggle the most, I am neither
physicist, mathmetician or engineering inclined. :-? I flunked Legos. :')

Another Forged Message :-[