![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott Ferrin wrote in message . ..
Six different kinds of AAMs on the Flanker? What is that, the AA-10, AA-11, AA-12 and what AA-8? What are the other 2? R-37 was cancelled, That air to air Krypton looking thing is a paper design AFAIK and the AAA-AE or whatever that two stage long range missile was has never entered service either. Flanker AAMs: R-27, R-40, R-60, R-73A, R-77, and KS-172. KS-172 is a paper missile. The KS-172: http://www.military.cz/russia/air/we...172/ks-172.htm Rob |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 30 Nov 2003 00:43:48 -0800, (robert arndt) wrote:
Scott Ferrin wrote in message . .. Six different kinds of AAMs on the Flanker? What is that, the AA-10, AA-11, AA-12 and what AA-8? What are the other 2? R-37 was cancelled, That air to air Krypton looking thing is a paper design AFAIK and the AAA-AE or whatever that two stage long range missile was has never entered service either. Flanker AAMs: R-27, R-40, R-60, R-73A, R-77, and KS-172. KS-172 is a paper missile. The KS-172: http://www.military.cz/russia/air/we...172/ks-172.htm Rob Yeah, I know which one it is but it never went into production. Neither did the R-37 http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/ks172.htm This one mentions that China "reportedly acquired them from Russia" but that article was from 2001. cns.miis.edu/pubs/npr/vol08/83/83lee.pdf I've looked for more info on the KS 172 and R-37 and the latest I've found is several years old. I've found nothing to suggestg either of the programs went anywhere but some that said "no funding". There are several sources that say the Flanker would be compatable but that in itself really doesn't say anything about the missile bieng in service. I've found several web pages that mention the AA-6 being associated with the Flanker but they appear to have all copied their information from the same source. I'm still of the opinion that the Flanker doesn't carry the AA-6 but I'm open to being persuaded. I've just never seen a picture of a Flanker carrying one nor recall reading of it carrying one, nor can imagine the need for it to do so. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Performance Comparison Sheet | Ed Baker | Home Built | 6 | December 2nd 04 02:14 AM |
Aerobatic engine IO-360 AEIO-360 comparison | Jay Moreland | Aerobatics | 5 | October 6th 04 01:52 AM |
spaceship one | Pianome | Home Built | 169 | June 30th 04 05:47 AM |
EMW A6 Comparison to X-15 | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 8 | October 2nd 03 02:26 AM |
Best Fighter For It's Time | Tom Cooper | Military Aviation | 63 | July 29th 03 03:22 AM |