Mxsmanic , IFR sensations, and some other stuff

Mxsmanic wrote:
gatt writes:

Dudley, I trust with absolute confidence that I'll learn from this
discussion from you so I'll refer to what I mentioned earlier in terms
of ignoring physical sensations in IMC and see what you think?

You're demonstrating a poor attitude.


If I want the opinion of a non-pilot video-game addict with absolutely
zero hours of actual flight training or time, I'll ask you.

You don't want to follow the rules, and so you come

Nobody said anything about "rules," but I did in fact quote the
authoritative FAA Airplane Flying Handbook repeatedly, and you chose to
ignore all of that. Funny how that works out. Anytime anybody cites
something authoritative, you ignore it.

If you are in IMC, you're IFR, and if you're IFR, you should _already_ be
fully aware of what all the instruments on the panel are saying.

Don't presume to talk to instrument-rated pilots about flying IMC.
Hell, you augured outside of Telluride in a freakin' flight simulator.
That's funny, 'cause I flew it in the same software and didn't have that
problem. It's easy; you're not even a competent Flight Simulator geek.

He http://204.108.4.16/d-tpp/0805/06920LD9.PDF

Bye, now. I'm going flying.

-c

gatt writes:

If I want the opinion of a non-pilot video-game addict with absolutely
zero hours of actual flight training or time, I'll ask you.

I don't qualify. Besides, I'll offer my opinion without prompting.

Nobody said anything about "rules," but I did in fact quote the
authoritative FAA Airplane Flying Handbook repeatedly, and you chose to
ignore all of that. Funny how that works out. Anytime anybody cites
something authoritative, you ignore it.

Misinterpretations of the book will not help you in the air.

Don't presume to talk to instrument-rated pilots about flying IMC.

Why not? Some of them have dangerous ideas.

Hell, you augured outside of Telluride in a freakin' flight simulator.
That's funny, 'cause I flew it in the same software and didn't have that
problem. It's easy; you're not even a competent Flight Simulator geek.

A simulator might be a better play to practice IFR, if you haven't
internalized the necessity of relying on instruments.

Bye, now. I'm going flying.

Avoid IMC.

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

gatt writes:

If I want the opinion of a non-pilot video-game addict with
absolutely zero hours of actual flight training or time, I'll ask
you.

I don't qualify. Besides, I'll offer my opinion without prompting.

Nobody said anything about "rules," but I did in fact quote the
authoritative FAA Airplane Flying Handbook repeatedly, and you chose
to ignore all of that. Funny how that works out. Anytime anybody
cites something authoritative, you ignore it.

Misinterpretations of the book will not help you in the air.

Don't presume to talk to instrument-rated pilots about flying IMC.

Why not? Some of them have dangerous ideas.


No, they don;t. you do.


Bertie

Mxsmanic wrote:

Besides, I'll offer my opinion without prompting.

That doesn't make it worth two turds on my lawn. Anybody can do that.
You're the only one offering opinions out here that's a fake pilot


Nobody said anything about "rules," but I did in fact quote the
authoritative FAA Airplane Flying Handbook repeatedly, and you chose to
ignore all of that. Funny how that works out. Anytime anybody cites
something authoritative, you ignore it.

Misinterpretations of the book will not help you in the air.

I logged 1.1 hours in the actual sky last night. You?

Bye, now. I'm going flying.

Avoid IMC.

Not necessary. I completed an Instrument Proficiency Check three weeks
ago. I wasn't even due for it, just did it anyway. Six different
approaches, radar vectoring, unusual attitude recovery, etc.

You should try it sometime.

-c

gatt writes:

Not necessary. I completed an Instrument Proficiency Check three weeks
ago. I wasn't even due for it, just did it anyway. Six different
approaches, radar vectoring, unusual attitude recovery, etc.

What were the weather conditions?

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

gatt writes:

Not necessary. I completed an Instrument Proficiency Check three weeks
ago. I wasn't even due for it, just did it anyway. Six different
approaches, radar vectoring, unusual attitude recovery, etc.

What were the weather conditions?


Are you really that stupid? Why does the weather conditions matter. Show
us from the FARs what weather conditions are required for an IPC.

On May 20, 3:50*pm, Helen Waite
wrote:

Are you really that stupid? *Why does the weather conditions matter. Show
us from the FARs what weather conditions are required for an IPC.

Remember you are talking to a NON PILOT who says sensory feelings are
not a part of IFR flying.

That's should wrap this thread up in a nutshell. :-)

" wrote in news:845081e2-95d9-4a7e-
:

On May 20, 3:50*pm, Helen Waite
wrote:

Are you really that stupid? *Why does the weather conditions matter. Sho
w
us from the FARs what weather conditions are required for an IPC.

Remember you are talking to a NON PILOT who says sensory feelings are
not a part of IFR flying.

That's should wrap this thread up in a nutshell. :-)


I'm well aware that Anthony is a non-pilot simmer who thinks that MSFS has
made him god's gift to the real world of aviation. He has to be exposed
each and every time he opens his mouth, especially in a student forum.

Isn't it interesting that while he is always asking other's for cites, he
doesn't supply any to back his twisted conclusions. As another poster very
accurately said, IMC stands for "Ignoramus Mxsmanic Claims" whenever
Anthony posts.

Helen Waite wrote:
Mxsmanic wrote in

Not necessary. I completed an Instrument Proficiency Check three weeks
ago. I wasn't even due for it, just did it anyway. Six different
approaches, radar vectoring, unusual attitude recovery, etc.
What were the weather conditions?


It was an IPC. Anybody who has done an IPC in flight knows they're
typically done under the hood.

Are you really that stupid? Why does the weather conditions matter. Show
us from the FARs what weather conditions are required for an IPC.

Well, Ash might call me an arrogant ass for pointing this out, but when
I did my instrument checkride, it included getting stuck in a 20-minute
hold in solid IMC. Not only did I live, I passed the checkride.

I've shot plenty of approaches in zero visibility, in a Frasca Tru
Flight--a REAL flight simulator--so I've pretty much got it covered no
matter how you look at it. I've certainly got nothing to prove to some
video-game addict, regardless of what he claims he read somewhere.

-c

gatt wrote in
:

Helen Waite wrote:
Mxsmanic wrote in

Not necessary. I completed an Instrument Proficiency Check three
weeks ago. I wasn't even due for it, just did it anyway. Six
different approaches, radar vectoring, unusual attitude recovery,
etc.
What were the weather conditions?


It was an IPC. Anybody who has done an IPC in flight knows they're
typically done under the hood.

Are you really that stupid? Why does the weather conditions matter.
Show us from the FARs what weather conditions are required for an
IPC.

Well, Ash might call me an arrogant ass for pointing this out, but
when I did my instrument checkride, it included getting stuck in a
20-minute hold in solid IMC. Not only did I live, I passed the
checkride.

I've shot plenty of approaches in zero visibility, in a Frasca Tru
Flight--a REAL flight simulator--so I've pretty much got it covered no
matter how you look at it. I've certainly got nothing to prove to
some video-game addict, regardless of what he claims he read
somewhere.

-c


I know that YOU know what real IFR flight is. Anthony doesn't. His
question to you was yet another example of what another poster aptly
referred to as IMC = Ignoramus Mxsmanic Claims.

Since he posts his drivel to a student news group and has NEVER flown a
real airplane, even the slightest error on his part should be pounced upon
and verified so students who are unaware of his total and complete lack of
qualifications will not ever listen to anything he says.