![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Extra credit points! The statement below is incomplete (hint: qualification
is missing). There are lots of places in US airspace where you could be IMC and NOT fly under IFR rules, and no flight plan...where are they? -- Regards, BobF. "romeomike" wrote in message ... Andrew Sarangan wrote: Lack of VFR does not imply you are in IMC. Lack of VFR only implies that you need to be on an IFR flight plan. From the AIM: "Instrument Meteorological Conditions--Meteorological conditions expressed in terms of visibility, distance from cloud, and ceiling less than the minima specified for visual meteorological conditions." So if you are not in VMC you are in IMC and fly under IFR. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bob F." wrote in
: Extra credit points! The statement below is incomplete (hint: qualification is missing). There are lots of places in US airspace where you could be IMC and NOT fly under IFR rules, and no flight plan...where are they? Glass G airspace. Lot's of it out west. -- Marty Shapiro Silicon Rallye Inc. (remove SPAMNOT to email me) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 20, 9:11 pm, Marty Shapiro
wrote: "Bob F." wrote m: Extra credit points! The statement below is incomplete (hint: qualification is missing). There are lots of places in US airspace where you could be IMC and NOT fly under IFR rules, and no flight plan...where are they? Glass G airspace. Lot's of it out west. Even in class G you must still follow all the IFR rules, except you don't need a ATC clearance. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andrew Sarangan wrote in
: On May 20, 9:11 pm, Marty Shapiro wrote: "Bob F." wrote m: Extra credit points! The statement below is incomplete (hint: qualification is missing). There are lots of places in US airspace where you could be IMC and NOT fly under IFR rules, and no flight plan...where are they? Glass G airspace. Lot's of it out west. Even in class G you must still follow all the IFR rules, except you don't need a ATC clearance. All of them? Any FAR which states "when operating is controlled air space" doesn't apply. That still leaves a few, but most of them are gone. Communication with ATC? Not required in G. Flight plan? Not required in G. No need to file or activate. Altitude? Well, yes. But with no ATC communication requirement, you can change it anytime you want. Unless I missed something in a quick scan, 91.179 doesn't address altitudes below 2,000' AGL and over a flat area, such as a desert, you only need to be 1,000' AGL per 91.177. So, the rules on altidude based on direction of flight does not necessarily apply. If they did in G which only goes to 1,200' AGL, all IFR traffic there would be one way. Fuel on board? Well, I guess if you got ramped checked, you should have statutory IFR reserves on departure, but since you're not required to have a flight plan in G, what would be used to determine if you met IFR reserves? Malfunctions? No report required in G. Instrument currency? Absolutely must have. No exceptions for class G! SFAR 97 only applies to published routes, which are at least class E. So, although it would be very stupid to do so, you can fly IFR in class G airspace and not follow most of the IFR rules. -- Marty Shapiro Silicon Rallye Inc. (remove SPAMNOT to email me) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cruising altitude requirements still apply, and I am not seeing where
any exemption is made for 2000' AGL. But it does seem like traffic has to be only one-way in areas where class G only extends up to 1200'. This is a bit confusing, but perhaps a moot point. On May 21, 3:43 am, Marty Shapiro wrote: Andrew Sarangan wrote : On May 20, 9:11 pm, Marty Shapiro wrote: "Bob F." wrote m: Extra credit points! The statement below is incomplete (hint: qualification is missing). There are lots of places in US airspace where you could be IMC and NOT fly under IFR rules, and no flight plan...where are they? Glass G airspace. Lot's of it out west. Even in class G you must still follow all the IFR rules, except you don't need a ATC clearance. All of them? Any FAR which states "when operating is controlled air space" doesn't apply. That still leaves a few, but most of them are gone. Communication with ATC? Not required in G. Flight plan? Not required in G. No need to file or activate. Altitude? Well, yes. But with no ATC communication requirement, you can change it anytime you want. Unless I missed something in a quick scan, 91.179 doesn't address altitudes below 2,000' AGL and over a flat area, such as a desert, you only need to be 1,000' AGL per 91.177. So, the rules on altidude based on direction of flight does not necessarily apply. If they did in G which only goes to 1,200' AGL, all IFR traffic there would be one way. Fuel on board? Well, I guess if you got ramped checked, you should have statutory IFR reserves on departure, but since you're not required to have a flight plan in G, what would be used to determine if you met IFR reserves? Malfunctions? No report required in G. Instrument currency? Absolutely must have. No exceptions for class G! SFAR 97 only applies to published routes, which are at least class E. So, although it would be very stupid to do so, you can fly IFR in class G airspace and not follow most of the IFR rules. -- Marty Shapiro Silicon Rallye Inc. (remove SPAMNOT to email me) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob F. wrote:
Extra credit points! The statement below is incomplete (hint: qualification is missing). There are lots of places in US airspace where you could be IMC and NOT fly under IFR rules, and no flight plan...where are they? Yeah, and I live there. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 20, 7:30*pm, "Bob F." wrote:
Extra credit points! *The statement below is incomplete (hint: qualification is missing). *There are lots of places in US airspace where you could be IMC and NOT fly under IFR rules, and no flight plan...where are they? Where Mx has never departed with him flying a real plane....... Unless secretarial chairs have the ability to leave the (G)round. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 20 May 2008 20:30:20 -0400, "Bob F."
wrote: Extra credit points! The statement below is incomplete (hint: qualification is missing). There are lots of places in US airspace where you could be IMC and NOT fly under IFR rules, and no flight plan...where are they? Class G space. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sandblasting reference? | Michael Horowitz | Home Built | 7 | November 20th 07 07:01 AM |
FAR Reference - Self Fueling | Ben Smith | Owning | 8 | April 8th 04 11:07 PM |
Engineering reference: | Richard Lamb | Home Built | 1 | March 14th 04 03:18 PM |
For General Reference | El Roto | Home Built | 0 | February 23rd 04 04:00 AM |
looking for modern F-4 reference | Rob van Riel | Military Aviation | 1 | November 13th 03 08:39 PM |