Mxsmanic , IFR sensations, and some other stuff

God.I hope this clears this up!

It won't -- but thanks for trying.

For reasons known only to them, some posters here are going to extraordinary
lengths to prove that "seat of the pants" sensations are a part of IFR
flight -- even though every published source (and every expert here) has
agreed with MX's statements to the contrary.

It's like they are willing to go to ANY length to try to prove the statement
wrong simply because the source (in this case) was a non-pilot. I don't
know what mysterious power MX has over some participants in this group, but
it's downright creepy.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"

Jay Honeck writes:

For reasons known only to them, some posters here are going to extraordinary
lengths to prove that "seat of the pants" sensations are a part of IFR
flight -- even though every published source (and every expert here) has
agreed with MX's statements to the contrary.

It's like they are willing to go to ANY length to try to prove the statement
wrong simply because the source (in this case) was a non-pilot. I don't
know what mysterious power MX has over some participants in this group, but
it's downright creepy.

I hope that this compulsion on their part does not extend beyond this
newsgroup, because if they exhibit the same obstinacy while flying ...

On May 21, 8:56*am, "Jay Honeck" wrote:
For reasons known only to them, some posters here are going to extraordinary
lengths to prove that "seat of the pants" sensations are a part of IFR
flight -- even though every published source (and every expert here) has
agreed with MX's statements to the contrary.

It's like they are willing to go to ANY length to try to prove the statement
wrong simply because the source (in this case) was a non-pilot. * I don't
know what mysterious power MX has over some participants in this group, but
it's downright creepy.

I will be the first to admit that I have zero knowledge of the topic,
which is why I have been watching the posts to see how this played
out.

But from what I have seen so far, I would have to agree with your
observation, especially the comment about going to Paris to shoot
Mxsmanic:

Prosecutor: "So let me get this straight...you shot him because..."
Shooter: "..because he's an idiot!"
Prosecutor: "Certainly that cannot be the only reason..."
Shooter: "Yes, that's pretty much it. We felt that we would be better
off without his posts."
Prosecutor: "But you are an American. What happened to all that
freedom-of-speech stuff?"
Shooter: "That applies to everyone except MxsManic."
Prosecutor: "Why?"
Shooter: "Because he is an idiot, and we do not like what he says, and
he makes me and my USENET pals angry."

-Le Chaud Lapin-