![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: Buster Hymen writes: Saying one had an instructor who was not afraid to touch a cloud has absolutely nothing to do with machismo or flaunting FAA regulations, be they VFR, IFR, or any other area. Yes, it does. The FAA wants you to keep a certain distance from clouds because under VFR you are maintaining visual separation, and you cannot see what might be inside those clouds. If you get to close, and another aircraft comes out of the cloud, you may not have time to react safely. What a maroon! Do you see the irony in this? You are soooo ****ing stooopid. You can legally AND safely fly 50' (and less) from a cloud while VFR. Been there, done that, no big deal. Something you won't learn on MSFS, you fjukktard. All your posts are predicated on your total lack of understanding of real aviation. All you do is regurgitate stuff which in your total lack of experience you think might be applicable, but in fact is wrong. You don't understand aviation one whit. You never have and you never will. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Buster Hymen writes:
You are soooo ****ing stooopid. You can legally AND safely fly 50' (and less) from a cloud while VFR. Been there, done that, no big deal. In Class C, D, E, and G, you must maintain 2000' of lateral clearance from the clouds under VFR (except under 1200' AGL in Class G), below 10,000' MSL. Flying only 50' away from a cloud under VFR is illegal under these conditions. The main reason for this is that there may be other aircraft in the clouds. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
... Flying only 50' away from a cloud under VFR is illegal under these conditions. It's also illegal while intoxicated, if you don't have a pilot certficiate, if you don't have a medical, if you are taking prescription meds, and a host of other reasons. That's not what he was referring to either. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
... In Class C, D, E, and G, you must maintain 2000' of lateral clearance from the clouds under VFR (except under 1200' AGL in Class G), below 10,000' MSL. The above statement is incorrect. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: Buster Hymen writes: You are soooo ****ing stooopid. You can legally AND safely fly 50' (and less) from a cloud while VFR. Been there, done that, no big deal. In Class C, D, E, and G, you must maintain 2000' of lateral clearance from the clouds under VFR (except under 1200' AGL in Class G), below 10,000' MSL. Flying only 50' away from a cloud under VFR is illegal under these conditions. The main reason for this is that there may be other aircraft in the clouds. As ususal, Anthony, you don't understand. You're just a dip **** who doesn't understand the real world of aviation. We're not playing MSFS here. Try reading what I said. Then try to think. I know that's a major effort for you and probably causes you much pain, but try. I said that one can legally and safely fly 50' from a cloud. Only your incompetent knowledge of aviation causes you to claim otherwise. You are, as you usually do, proving to the world that you don't know **** from shinola. Legally means that no violation of a FAR occurs. Do you understand that? Its a simple concept. No FAR violation = legal! Got that? Apparently not, as your response implies violation of the FARS. No violation of the FARs occured. I wrote nothing of the sort, you moron. All you did was regurgitate the rules for VFR flight in class C, D, E, and G airspace without the slightest understanding of what you were reading. In fact, you managed to inroduce a subtle error in your regurgitation. You don't begin to understand. You never have and never will. When it comes to aviation, you're a total failure, just as you've been in all the other endeavors in your life. Abject failure describes you to a T. I'll say it again. Under VFR flight rules, there is a way you can legally and safely fly 50' from a cloud (above, below, or laterally). You, Anthony, obviously don't know how. But you won't admit that you don't and, instead, demonstrating that you don't know **** from shinola, incompetently conclude it can't be done. Wrong again, fjukktard. Wrong again. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 21, 4:51*pm, Buster Hymen wrote:
*Under VFR flight rules, there is a way you can legally and safely fly 50' from a cloud (above, below, or laterally). You, Anthony, obviously don't know how. *But you won't admit that you don't and, instead, demonstrating that you don't know **** from shinola, incompetently conclude it can't be done. *Wrong again, fjukktard. *Wrong again. Let me give him a hint. (B)usy airspace you can sidle up to a cloud up close and personal :-) (G)round, while not as much space 'tween the cumulogranite and white fluffy kind, it really can be done. NOT my type of flying, will leave those to the tree topper flyers. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
" wrote in
: On May 21, 4:51*pm, Buster Hymen wrote: *Under VFR flight rules, there is a way you can legally and safely fly 50' from a cloud (above, below, or laterally). You, Anthony , obviously don't know how. *But you won't admit that you don't and, instead, demonstrating that you don't know **** from shinola, incompetentl y conclude it can't be done. *Wrong again, fjukktard. *Wrong again. Let me give him a hint. (B)usy airspace you can sidle up to a cloud up close and personal :-) (G)round, while not as much space 'tween the cumulogranite and white fluffy kind, it really can be done. NOT my type of flying, will leave those to the tree topper flyers. You can also ask your friends in ATC for a special favor. If you ask nicely, they'll probably accomodate you. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Buster Hymen writes:
I'll say it again. Under VFR flight rules, there is a way you can legally and safely fly 50' from a cloud (above, below, or laterally). There is a way to do anything you want while flying (FAR 91.3). However, that doesn't mean that you are usually in a position to legally do so. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
news ![]() Buster Hymen writes: I'll say it again. Under VFR flight rules, there is a way you can legally and safely fly 50' from a cloud (above, below, or laterally). There is a way to do anything you want while flying (FAR 91.3). However, that doesn't mean that you are usually in a position to legally do so. Wrong again, fjukktard. You don't need to invoke emergency authority under 91.3 to legally and safely fly 50' from a cloud while VFR. Anthony, you have no idea what you're talking about. You're pathetic attempts to slither out of the mistake you've made here continue to display to everyone reading this forum that you don't know **** from shinola. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Buster Hymen writes:
You don't need to invoke emergency authority under 91.3 to legally and safely fly 50' from a cloud while VFR. I did not say otherwise. I simply pointed out that there are exceptions to just about every rule. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sandblasting reference? | Michael Horowitz | Home Built | 7 | November 20th 07 07:01 AM |
FAR Reference - Self Fueling | Ben Smith | Owning | 8 | April 8th 04 11:07 PM |
Engineering reference: | Richard Lamb | Home Built | 1 | March 14th 04 03:18 PM |
For General Reference | El Roto | Home Built | 0 | February 23rd 04 04:00 AM |
looking for modern F-4 reference | Rob van Riel | Military Aviation | 1 | November 13th 03 08:39 PM |