Air sickness

"Cubdriver" usenet AT danford DOT net wrote in message
...


My daughter the sailor claims that getting up on deck and working like
a navvy is a sure cure/preventive, but I have not found this to be the
case.

Getting up on deck has always worked for me. Unfortunately, much of my Navy
time was spent on board submarines where that was not an option.

Vaughn

Vaughn Simon wrote:
My daughter the sailor claims that getting up on deck and working like
a navvy is a sure cure/preventive, but I have not found this to be the
case.

Getting up on deck has always worked for me. Unfortunately, much of my Navy
time was spent on board submarines where that was not an option.


But it also shouldn't have been a problem. From my diving days, I know that the
roughest sea calms down fairly close to the surface. Many a seasick diver
settled his stomach by getting off the surface.

With nuclear submarines being the norm, why travel at the surface in a rough
sea?



--
Mortimer Schnerd, RN
mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com

"Mortimer Schnerd, RN" mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com wrote in message
...

With nuclear submarines being the norm, why travel at the surface in a rough
sea?

Good question! Operating out of Scotland, we had to travel several hours to
and from port on the surface. Our schedule was "locked in stone" so we could
not wait for nice weather. Sometimes it was months between those few hours of
hell, so I never had a chance to really get acclimated to the motion.
Submerged, we sometimes took surprisingly large rolls, but had little pitching
motion. One tactic back then was to follow storms for as long as possible to
avoid detection, so we were sometimes taking those rolls for a week or more at a
time. That motion I found inconvenient, but it never made me sick.

Vaughn

On May 26, 2:52 pm, "Vaughn Simon"
wrote:
"Mortimer Schnerd, RN" mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com wrote in messagenews:j8mdnZOyPaS4ZqfVnZ2dnUVZ_gidnZ2d@gigan ews.com...



With nuclear submarines being the norm, why travel at the surface in a rough
sea?

Good question! Operating out of Scotland, we had to travel several hours to
and from port on the surface. Our schedule was "locked in stone" so we could
not wait for nice weather. Sometimes it was months between those few hours of
hell, so I never had a chance to really get acclimated to the motion.
Submerged, we sometimes took surprisingly large rolls, but had little pitching
motion. One tactic back then was to follow storms for as long as possible to
avoid detection, so we were sometimes taking those rolls for a week or more at a
time. That motion I found inconvenient, but it never made me sick.

Vaughn

Vaughn, for sure you were not anywhere near hull limits deep so maybe
this information is not classified. Do you know at what depth you were
still experiencing rolls of a significant amplitude? I'd have guessed
in deep water unless the boat was on the edge of a current it would be
pretty stable if deeper than 10 or 20 times the height of the surface
waves.

"Tina" wrote in message
...

Vaughn, for sure you were not anywhere near hull limits deep so maybe
this information is not classified. Do you know at what depth you were
still experiencing rolls of a significant amplitude? I'd have guessed
in deep water unless the boat was on the edge of a current it would be
pretty stable if deeper than 10 or 20 times the height of the surface
waves.

That was a long time ago, so I don't remember specific depths. I think our
typical cruising depth was just a couple hundred feet. (not giving anything
away, that class of subs is long scrapped and probably exists in the form of
razor blades and Toyotas.)

Vaughn