History Channel

"Robert Sveinson" wrote in message
news

"®i©ardo" wrote in message
...
GC wrote:
A question to the group. Is the History channel distorting the facts?

Of course it isn't. It's just rewriting history to show the USA in a very
good light,

Robin Neillands has a paragraph in one of his books
that states that all non-American participants
in WW II have been and are being airbrushed
out of history.

How about this bit of history about Normandy?

"The stategy developed, and plan prepared for Operation Overlord by the
Allied Ground Force Commander, the British General Sir Bernard Law
Montgomery, was *flawed* in concept and failed to work in practice.
Eventually, frustrated by the failure of Montgomery's strategy and the
caution
and timidity of the British and Canadian troops, American forces under
Generals Eisenhower, Bradley and Patton seized the initiative, revised
the plan, broke out in the West, drove back the German forces in
disarray, to win the Normandy battle-and the war.
All this they would have done much sooner if the British
and Canadians had not sat in their trenches drinking tea-American
historians never fail to mention tea-while the US forces did all the
fighting.
The outcome of the Normandy battle-so goes the allegation-would
have been far more conclusive if the aforesaid British and Canadians had
not
been "timid" and "cautious" and "slow" at Falaise, thereby allowing
the German Army to escape across the Seine."


Now that really is scandalously insulting to the memory of the men who
fought and died in Operation Goodwood.