|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
May 30th 08, 02:32 AM
posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
|
|||
|
|||
CFI oral intel
Dudley Henriques presented the following explanation :
A slipped cross control stall as relates to spin entry is FAR less pro-spin than a skid entry. Dudley, I don't understand why that is? Are you assuming 110 nauts? 
|
|
#2
May 30th 08, 02:36 AM
posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
|
|||
|
|||
|
CFI oral intel
Gezellig wrote:
Dudley Henriques presented the following explanation : A slipped cross control stall as relates to spin entry is FAR less pro-spin than a skid entry. Dudley, I don't understand why that is? Are you assuming 110 nauts? Not sure what you're asking as the 110 kts is connected to the other question, not the cross controlled stall question as referenced above, but taking a guess......if you check question number one about dying at the controls, the trim speed given was 110 kts. :-) -- Dudley Henriques
|
|
#3
May 30th 08, 03:48 AM
posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
|
|||
|
|||
|
CFI oral intel
Dudley Henriques laid this down on his screen :
Gezellig wrote: Dudley Henriques presented the following explanation : A slipped cross control stall as relates to spin entry is FAR less pro-spin than a skid entry. Dudley, I don't understand why that is? Are you assuming 110 nauts? Not sure what you're asking as the 110 kts is connected to the other question, not the cross controlled stall question as referenced above, but taking a guess......if you check question number one about dying at the controls, the trim speed given was 110 kts. :-) lol I got my answer from your other post. I got on track from the discussion, I have no idea where I got off track on the 110 nauts. I revel in my ineptitude. It makes me endearing. I hope I get laid because of it. No, forget that. I don't need another bimbette in my life.
|
|
#4
May 30th 08, 03:48 AM
posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
|
|||
|
|||
|
CFI oral intel
Gezellig wrote:
Not sure what you're asking as the 110 kts is connected to the other question, not the cross controlled stall question as referenced above, but taking a guess......if you check question number one about dying at the controls, the trim speed given was 110 kts. :-) lol I got my answer from your other post. I got on track from the discussion, I have no idea where I got off track on the 110 nauts. I revel in my ineptitude. It makes me endearing. I hope I get laid because of it. No, forget that. I don't need another bimbette in my life. Usenet will do that to you sometimes, although I have to admit it hasn't gotten me laid yet :-) -- Dudley Henriques
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| U.S. Navy Plans EPX Intel-Gathering Aircraft | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 0 | February 23rd 08 02:38 AM |
| FOI...lol... CFI oral? | gatt[_2_] | Piloting | 29 | January 5th 08 05:01 PM |
| Q: Apple MAC Book (pro) with Intel core 2 duo running Windows XP plus soaring software | Ruud | Soaring | 1 | October 31st 06 01:02 AM |
| INTEL BILL CON JOB | Cribsheet | Piloting | 0 | December 7th 04 05:40 PM |
Hybrid Mode
