![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 30, 9:07*pm, rank amature wrote:
On May 28, 10:20*pm, Dan wrote: All, I am trying to figure out how to complete the ICAO information on fltplan.com for filing a flightplan for a C182 with a Garmin 530W. The RNAV/RNP stuff has me confused. *What would the proper answers be for an aircraft with a 530W? How about a standard Garmin 430? Not quite sure what you are asking. In the US RNP reqiures SAAAR . Who do you fly for ? Frank - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Just a personal C182.... Nothing fancy, no special training or certification. I just want to ensure I can use the GPS for arrivals, departures, approaches, and enroute ops (as I already do now). |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2 juin, 19:47, Dan wrote:
On May 30, 9:07*pm, rank amature wrote: On May 28, 10:20*pm, Dan wrote: All, I am trying to figure out how to complete the ICAO information on fltplan.com for filing a flightplan for a C182 with a Garmin 530W. The RNAV/RNP stuff has me confused. *What would the proper answers be for an aircraft with a 530W? How about a standard Garmin 430? Not quite sure what you are asking. In the US RNP reqiures SAAAR . Who do you fly for ? Frank - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Just a personal C182.... Nothing fancy, no special training or certification. *I just want to ensure I can use the GPS for arrivals, departures, approaches, and enroute ops (as I already do now). SG/S is OK. It says you have B-RNAV capabilities, which is OK to fly SID/STAR based on RNAV (unless the chart says P-RNAV required). |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dan" wrote in message
... Just a personal C182.... Nothing fancy, no special training or certification. I just want to ensure I can use the GPS for arrivals, departures, approaches, and enroute ops (as I already do now). My limited understanding of RNAV/RNP is it's just being implemented at the largest air carrier airports at this time. I know in the DFW metroplex, DFW airport is the only airport in the area using RNAV (departures only). They may start using them at DAL sometime in the future. Air carriers are the only ones I've seen using the procedures. I can imagine there are a few hoops you have to dive through to meet SAAAR and even if you could do all that, the only RNAV procedures I've seen are for jets (perhaps there are others, but I'm only familiar with the ones in my area). Even given all that, RNAV procedures seem to have a pretty high level of pilot deviations. My guess for this is there's a lot of people out there not programming the box correctly. My guess is eventually RNAV will be implemented much more widely as it reduces controller and pilot workload, but it may be quite a while before you see very many single engine prop guys doing it. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:47:48 GMT, "Mike" wrote:
"Dan" wrote in message ... Just a personal C182.... Nothing fancy, no special training or certification. I just want to ensure I can use the GPS for arrivals, departures, approaches, and enroute ops (as I already do now). My limited understanding of RNAV/RNP is it's just being implemented at the largest air carrier airports at this time. I know in the DFW metroplex, DFW airport is the only airport in the area using RNAV (departures only). They may start using them at DAL sometime in the future. Air carriers are the only ones I've seen using the procedures. I can imagine there are a few hoops you have to dive through to meet SAAAR and even if you could do all that, the only RNAV procedures I've seen are for jets (perhaps there are others, but I'm only familiar with the ones in my area). Even given all that, RNAV procedures seem to have a pretty high level of pilot deviations. My guess for this is there's a lot of people out there not programming the box correctly. My guess is eventually RNAV will be implemented much more widely as it reduces controller and pilot workload, but it may be quite a while before you see very many single engine prop guys doing it. SAAAR != this kind of RNAV. See say COSTR.COSTR1 or BAIRN.BAIRN1 at MCO for a standard RNAV1 STAR that doesn't say "applies to turbojet aircraft only" and applies to the various Orlando airports (first area that comes to mind since I was just down there, but I'm sure there are other RNAV arrivals that apply to reliever airports and aren't turbojet only). |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Long EZ plans, Mini IMP plans, F4U Corsair plans, materials, instruments for sale | reader | Home Built | 1 | January 26th 11 01:40 AM |
Flight plans lost? | Viperdoc[_4_] | Piloting | 26 | June 27th 07 06:32 AM |
Who does flight plans? | Michael 182 | Piloting | 158 | July 4th 05 02:50 AM |
IFR Flight Plans on the web | Jeff Saylor | Instrument Flight Rules | 2 | May 3rd 04 03:28 PM |
IFR Flight Plans on the web | MLenoch | Piloting | 6 | April 28th 04 03:45 AM |