![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 2, 10:00*pm, Billy Crabs wrote:
On Jun 2, 5:12*pm, Tony wrote: Ram air is only as useful the allowing air to get to your carburater faster but is not necessarily used. When your piston is on its intake stroke(vaccum) your combustion chamber can only draw in enough air that is in conjuction to the chambers volume and all other air that is present after the compression stroke is exported to engines smog devices and is recirculated only AFTER being filtered. *All engines come off the assembly lines, be it an airplane motor or a vehicle motor, to draw the amount of air that it needs to run at opptimum performance. *Ram Air is a myth and don't try to throw "turbo" into the conversation because turbo is recircualted exhaust and still has unburnt fuel in the fumes. I think you are quite wrong. Ram air in fact gives us a half inch or so more manifold pressure, and that increases the total weight of the air-fuel mixture in the cylinder. Reduce your 'it doesn't matter argument to an extreme to see how it fails. As for turbos, the turbine is powered by the exhaust gasses coming from the engine, the exhaust gas itself is not reintroduced into the cylinders. The turbine itself could be powered by an electric motor, for that matter. That was the model for my tongue in cheek comment about using a shop vac to increase manifold pressure. The air going into the manifold has the same atmospheric weight as if it was outside the manifold, what makes it denser is the addition of fuel into the air/fuel mixture, unless the air is in a perfect vaccum it will not increase in pressure and most certainly not density and the turbos do reintroduce fuel back into the combustion mixture, If you've ever seen a read out of carbon emissions for a non turbo vehicle it still has enough unburnt fuel to power your vehicle for another 5% of your fuel consumption *and turbos IF powered by a motorized turbine are as useless as ram air because of the statement I made in my previous post. your intake is only as much as the volume of your cylinders- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I retract that last statement, turbos are not useless, I would be contradicting myself if I said they were. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|