![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bertie the Bunyip wrote in news:Xns9AB3A5306F330****upropeeh@
208.90.168.18: Tina wrote in : On Jun 4, 4:49 am, HARRY POTTER wrote: Tina wrote: I understand how positive dihedral helps dynamic stability in airplanes, but some big ones, like the Russian An 124 Condor, has a pronounced negative dihedral -- the wings have a noticeable downward slope. Q1: Do those airplanes need active fly by wire controls to maintain stability, or is something else at play that keeps them right side up? Q2: Does anyone have a design rationalization for such a configuration, as opposed to just zero dihedral? I can appreciate why fighters have it -- they exploit lack of aerodynamic stability for rapid maneuvers -- but transports that spend their whole life being straight and level are another issue. Note: I have not morphed into an Mx clone! The AN124 does not have negative dihedral. It just looks that way when it's on the ground because the weight of the engines bends the wings so they look drooped down. Once it's in the air, the fuselage bends the wings the other way, so it actually does have dihedral. --http://onlinelogbook.net Thanks -- didn't realize it was simply wing droop when they are not developing lift. That's what happens when you fly in stiff winged little airplanes, you start overlooking something as obvious as that. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WJscAaKfr7A Ooops, that was a MSFS one. Here's an actual aiplane taking off... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BcyRy...eature=related Which clarly shows the sockpuppet is wrong. Bertie |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WJscAaKfr7A Ooops, that was a MSFS one. ---------- /snip/ Am I the only one who sees the *immense* irony in this? Happy Flying! Scott Skylane |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Scott Skylane" wrote in message ions... Bertie the Bunyip wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WJscAaKfr7A Ooops, that was a MSFS one. ---------- /snip/ Am I the only one who sees the *immense* irony in this? Happy Flying! Scott Skylane Apparently something he and Anthony have been working on. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Maxwell" luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote in news:hiF1k.1883$nD3.1442
@newsfe15.lga: "Scott Skylane" wrote in message ions... Bertie the Bunyip wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WJscAaKfr7A Ooops, that was a MSFS one. ---------- /snip/ Am I the only one who sees the *immense* irony in this? Happy Flying! Scott Skylane Apparently something he and Anthony have been working on. Yeh, good one lamer boi. You're giving me a real hiding there. Keep up the good work. Bertie |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Another old negative | Don Pyeatt | Aviation Photos | 0 | March 2nd 08 05:32 PM |
"predator' dihedral | Phil Rhodes | Naval Aviation | 5 | May 25th 07 09:54 PM |
Wing dihedral | Dallas | Piloting | 35 | March 20th 06 04:01 PM |
how to cope with negative g´s? | Markus | Aerobatics | 6 | July 2nd 05 12:00 AM |
Biplane wing dihedral | vincent p. norris | General Aviation | 20 | June 18th 05 02:58 AM |