![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 9, 11:31*am, Le Chaud Lapin wrote:
On Jun 9, 1:06*pm, "Robert M. Gary" wrote: I think if the book said more about how it worked, there would be no misunderstanding. I think if you walked up to an actual airplane there would be no misunderstanding. -Robert |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 9, 6:19*pm, "Robert M. Gary" wrote:
On Jun 9, 11:31*am, Le Chaud Lapin wrote: On Jun 9, 1:06*pm, "Robert M. Gary" wrote: I think if the book said more about how it worked, there would be no misunderstanding. I think if you walked up to an actual airplane there would be no misunderstanding. My first experience with trim control was neither with a book or a plane, but with the instructor. I think there are a lot of things that students are assumed to know that they do not, which can be frustrating, as there is no difficult in the concepts, but the ommission of facts, which hurts more than helps. It is the instructor's choice to determine how deep s/he should delve into the mechanics of flight. One instructor might say, "Move trim wheel up or down to relieve pressure on yoke." Another might say, "Trim wheel is connected to a trim tab on elevator, often located on one side of elevator only, and air moving across elevator results in aerodynamic force vector on tab that acts on elevator to position elevator so that point of equilibrium is reached, and such force being sufficient that you no longer need the yoke to position the elevator. As you can imagine, speed and orientation of aircraft will have some effect on force...and therefore position of elevator. Also, if only one tab, force applies asymetrically to aircraft...etc." Both these explanations are true, but one of them eliminates the need for $30 product (or $30,000 aircraft) to know what is going on. -Le Chaud Lapin- |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 9, 8:18*pm, Le Chaud Lapin wrote:
Both these explanations are true, but one of them eliminates the need for $30 product (or $30,000 aircraft) to know what is going on. I find that its pretty difficult to teach students to fly without the aircraft. -Robert, CFII |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 9, 10:48*pm, "Robert M. Gary" wrote:
On Jun 9, 8:18*pm, Le Chaud Lapin wrote: Both these explanations are true, but one of them eliminates the need for $30 product (or $30,000 aircraft) to know what is going on. I find that its pretty difficult to teach students to fly without the aircraft. That brings us full-circle to a theme that was mildly explored in another post - what utility, if any, is there in using a simulator to learn things that do not require actual flying. So here the question would be whether it is possible to understand how a trim tab works without ever having flown an aircraft. I have flown in DA-20 and Tomahawk, but I do not think actual flight would have been necessary to understand how trim tab works. -Le Chaud Lapin- |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Le Chaud Lapin wrote: So here the question would be whether it is possible to understand how a trim tab works without ever having flown an aircraft. I have flown in DA-20 and Tomahawk, but I do not think actual flight would have been necessary to understand how trim tab works. Knowing how a trim tab works isn't necessary for flying. The pilot needs to know is how to use trim. -- Bob Noel (goodness, please trim replies!!!) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 10, 5:14*am, Bob Noel
wrote: In article , *Le Chaud Lapin wrote: So here the question would be whether it is possible to understand how a trim tab works without ever having flown an aircraft. I have flown in DA-20 and Tomahawk, but I do not think actual flight would have been necessary to understand how trim tab works. Knowing how a trim tab works isn't necessary for flying. *The pilot needs to know is how to use trim. It is not necessary to know how many things in aircraft work to be able to fly, but knowing how they work doesn't hurt. Otherwise companies like Jeppensen, FAA, etc, would not go through trouble of making all those pretty diagrams (and exams to go with). -Le Chaud Lapin- |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Le Chaud Lapin" wrote in message ... On Jun 9, 10:48 pm, "Robert M. Gary" wrote: On Jun 9, 8:18 pm, Le Chaud Lapin wrote: Both these explanations are true, but one of them eliminates the need for $30 product (or $30,000 aircraft) to know what is going on. I find that its pretty difficult to teach students to fly without the aircraft. That brings us full-circle to a theme that was mildly explored in another post - what utility, if any, is there in using a simulator to learn things that do not require actual flying. So here the question would be whether it is possible to understand how a trim tab works without ever having flown an aircraft. I have flown in DA-20 and Tomahawk, but I do not think actual flight would have been necessary to understand how trim tab works. -Le Chaud Lapin- Well, it's been a long time since I flew a Tomahawk and I never flew the DA-20, and my Tomahawk manual has gone AWOL; but I don't recall the Tomahawk having a tab--IIRC, it had a spring system. That gives a different "feel" and a different contribution to the feel of the primary controls; but there should have been little motivation for MS to attempt to model those subtleties--especially since the purchaser has choices in the physical controls (yokes, etc.) attached to his computer. Knowing how the systems work can be intellectually interesting for the technically oriented; essential for designers, builders and mechanics; and can easily save your life in the event of a systems failure in a real aircraft. Therefore, most members of this group need to know the systems on the aircraft they actually fly; but have no need for all of the possible combinations and permutations. The bottom line is that you are apparently part of the primary market for MSFS and it gives you enjoyment. OTOH, most members of this group (who use it at all) use it as a tool for procedure training, such as practicing intercepts and approaches, and do so for efficiency rather than entertainment. Peter |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 10, 9:32*am, "Peter Dohm" wrote:
Well, it's been a long time since I flew a Tomahawk and I never flew the DA-20, and my Tomahawk manual has gone AWOL; but I don't recall the Tomahawk having a tab--IIRC, it had a spring system. *That gives a different "feel" and a different contribution to the feel of the primary controls; but there should have been little motivation for MS to attempt to model those subtleties--especially since the purchaser has choices in the physical controls (yokes, etc.) attached to his computer. Knowing how the systems work can be intellectually interesting for the technically oriented; essential for designers, builders and mechanics; and can easily save your life in the event of a systems failure in a real aircraft. *Therefore, most members of this group need to know the systems on the aircraft they actually fly; but have no need for all of the possible combinations and permutations. My OP did not mention anything about combinations and permutations. It was asked in general, and then just for C172, as an example. The bottom line is that you are apparently part of the primary market for MSFS and it gives you enjoyment. *OTOH, most members of this group (who use it at all) use it as a tool for procedure training, such as practicing intercepts and approaches, and do so for efficiency rather than entertainment. Yes, I do enjoy understanding things, but my primary motivation is efficiency of savings. It was a lot cheaper to check my understanding of how trim tab works using a simulator than it was to drive 40km out to airport and fiddle with a real plane. -Le Chaud Lapin- |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Le Chaud Lapin" wrote in message news:9483664d-6897-4777-b4d4- Another might say, "Trim wheel is connected to a trim tab on elevator, often located on one side of elevator only, and air moving across elevator results in aerodynamic force vector on tab that acts on elevator to position elevator so that point of equilibrium is reached, and such force being sufficient that you no longer need the yoke to position the elevator. As you can imagine, speed and orientation of aircraft will have some effect on force...and therefore position of elevator. Also, if only one tab, force applies asymetrically to aircraft...etc." I'm glad I wasn't there the day he introduced the radio. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
F-100 detail | Pjmac35 | Aviation Photos | 0 | July 26th 07 10:29 AM |
Finding "Neutral" Position on Piper Elevator/Trim Tab | [email protected] | Owning | 10 | December 7th 06 01:43 PM |
Detail pops in too late in FS2004 | CatharticF1 | Simulators | 0 | August 27th 03 03:25 AM |