![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Actual Oxyclean User" wrote in message . net...
snip You need to be a little more specific about bravery when you talk about the Russians. Indeed. Much of their bravery came at the muzzle of an NKVD rifle. Actually Mark, only a tiny bit of it came from NKVD rifles, since there was very little NKVD to go around. There was no NKVD when Zhukov trounded the Japanese. There was no NKVD when Col. Polosukhin's 32nd Rifle Division gutted 40th Panzercorps at Borodino. There was no NKVD when Col. Katukov's 4th Tank Bde sliced and diced 4th Panzer Division on the approach to Tula. further examples can be supplied. So there's another one of your spiteful lies exposed. The Moscow panic was brutally surpressed by the NKVD. Apparently, Mark would prefer it if it had spread. What alternative was there? If you didn't work long hard hours in those factories, you could be shot. Apparently, Mark would prefer it if those factories had produced less. What alternative was there? NKVD units were generally interspersed with regular units. Yeah, around one battalion per Front. That works out to about 1% of the force. Anyone not showing sufficient enthusiasm for marching into a Nazi machine gun nest would be shot in the back. Yet another spiteful lie. No denying that it happened occasionally, but it was far from "anyone". The end of the war did not bring relief Sure it did. No Germans killing people by the tens of millions, after all. but did bring into being the gulag system of slave labor. Then there is the issue of the Russians that welcomed the Nazis hoping to get rid of the Communists. Ukranians, although not Russians, were often A minority were. But from the vast majority, the Germans got nothing but hatred and opposition. Hence the unsustainable casualties the Germans suffered, from the very start of the war. quite happy to see the Germans, Oh yeah, I remember the staged newsreels of people lined up neatly in front of villages and then running simultaneously towards German tanks to greet them. I don't buy anything so hokey, but it's no suprise that you do. The reality is that the Germans found the most bitter, determined resistance they had run into up to that point in the war when they attacked the USSR. especially remembering that Stalin's famine caused about 4 million of them to die. While Chechans were storming the Reichstag, their families back home were being deported to Siberia. And where were Japanese-Americans when Lt. Daniel Inoue was wounded in the action that got him a Distinguished Service Cross? Stuart Wilkes |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Stuart Wilkes" wrote in message om... "Actual Oxyclean User" wrote in message . net... snip You need to be a little more specific about bravery when you talk about the Russians. Indeed. Much of their bravery came at the muzzle of an NKVD rifle. Actually Mark, only a tiny bit of it came from NKVD rifles, since there was very little NKVD to go around. But enough to instill fear...which was the main objective anyway. There was no NKVD when Zhukov trounded the Japanese. And there was no NKVD when millions of Russians ran as fast as their little feet could carry them in front of the advancing Barbarossa frat house party. There was no NKVD when Col. Polosukhin's 32nd Rifle Division gutted 40th Panzercorps at Borodino. There was no NKVD when Col. Katukov's 4th Tank Bde sliced and diced 4th Panzer Division on the approach to Tula. further examples can be supplied. So there's another one of your spiteful lies exposed. The Moscow panic was brutally surpressed by the NKVD. Apparently, Mark would prefer it if it had spread. What alternative was there? Communication? Apparently this is an abstract concept for Russians. Still is. If you didn't work long hard hours in those factories, you could be shot. Apparently, Mark would prefer it if those factories had produced less. What alternative was there? In the US we didn't seem to have a problem. We didn't trump up phoney charges to get free slave labor. Not even interned Japanese were subjected to forced labor. The worst the German POWs had it was working in vegetable gardens to grow their own food. I guess that's why so many German POWs didn't want to be repatriated. Willy Von Braun didn't think it was so bad here. NKVD units were generally interspersed with regular units. Yeah, around one battalion per Front. That works out to about 1% of the force. Anyone not showing sufficient enthusiasm for marching into a Nazi machine gun nest would be shot in the back. Yet another spiteful lie. No denying that it happened occasionally, but it was far from "anyone". But no such "NKVD" units accompanied American soldiers, not even 1%. The end of the war did not bring relief Sure it did. No Germans killing people by the tens of millions, after all. And the Soviets simply picked up where the Nazis left off. but did bring into being the gulag system of slave labor. Then there is the issue of the Russians that welcomed the Nazis hoping to get rid of the Communists. Ukranians, although not Russians, were often A minority were. But from the vast majority, the Germans got nothing but hatred and opposition. Hence the unsustainable casualties the Germans suffered, from the very start of the war. Nyet. Byelorussians, Ukranians and Balts were quite happy to see the Nazis march into their towns...as were many Russians. The problem arose in the fact that there were two competing philosophies in the German military...one that wanted to "allie" with the conquered and the hardliners who took a more racist approach. The hardliners won out. You know this very well Stuey so quit the smoke screen. quite happy to see the Germans, Oh yeah, I remember the staged newsreels of people lined up neatly in front of villages and then running simultaneously towards German tanks to greet them. I don't buy anything so hokey, but it's no suprise that you do. Yes, of course. You were there and interviewed every person. Opinion, not fact. This is why nobody should believe any of your "history". You are incapable of separating your personal bias from historical fact. The reality is that the Germans found the most bitter, determined resistance they had run into up to that point in the war when they attacked the USSR. No. When the Germans attacked the USSR, they ran and surrendered by the millions. This is historical fact. Determined resitance did not happen until Stalingrad....and only because Stalin decided to make a meat grinder out of it i.e. the Soviets sent there to fight had no choice in the matter. especially remembering that Stalin's famine caused about 4 million of them to die. While Chechans were storming the Reichstag, their families back home were being deported to Siberia. And where were Japanese-Americans when Lt. Daniel Inoue was wounded in the action that got him a Distinguished Service Cross? They were be given food, clothing and shelter and protective custody. How many of those Japanese-Americans returned to Japan after the war? Another Stuey smoke screen where you try to cast one isolated incident as general policy. This sounds like Stuey hipocrisy to me. According to you, the Soviets were justified in committing mass murder during the Moscow panic but the US was wrong to gather together potential saboteurs. This double standard is nothing new for you. Stuart Wilkes, apologist for mass murder. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Actual Oxyclean User" wrote in message . net...
"Stuart Wilkes" wrote in message om... "Actual Oxyclean User" wrote in message . net... snip You need to be a little more specific about bravery when you talk about the Russians. Indeed. Much of their bravery came at the muzzle of an NKVD rifle. Actually Mark, only a tiny bit of it came from NKVD rifles, since there was very little NKVD to go around. But enough to instill fear...which was the main objective anyway. There was no NKVD when Zhukov trounded the Japanese. And there was no NKVD when millions of Russians ran as fast as their little feet could carry them in front of the advancing Barbarossa frat house party. That's because it was a war of racial extermination, Mark. It's generally smart to run away from one of those if you can. There was no NKVD when Col. Polosukhin's 32nd Rifle Division gutted 40th Panzercorps at Borodino. There was no NKVD when Col. Katukov's 4th Tank Bde sliced and diced 4th Panzer Division on the approach to Tula. further examples can be supplied. So there's another one of your spiteful lies exposed. The Moscow panic was brutally surpressed by the NKVD. Apparently, Mark would prefer it if it had spread. What alternative was there? Communication? Communicate what, with a war of racial extermination on the way? Apparently this is an abstract concept for Russians. Still is. If you didn't work long hard hours in those factories, you could be shot. Apparently, Mark would prefer it if those factories had produced less. What alternative was there? In the US we didn't seem to have a problem. We weren't being subjected to a war of racial extermination. There was no Wehrmacht on our territory killing tens of millions of us and occupying the most extensively-developed part of our country. We didn't trump up phoney charges to get free slave labor. Not even interned Japanese were subjected to forced labor. The worst the German POWs had it was working in vegetable gardens to grow their own food. I guess that's why so many German POWs didn't want to be repatriated. Willy Von Braun didn't think it was so bad here. NKVD units were generally interspersed with regular units. Yeah, around one battalion per Front. That works out to about 1% of the force. Anyone not showing sufficient enthusiasm for marching into a Nazi machine gun nest would be shot in the back. Yet another spiteful lie. No denying that it happened occasionally, but it was far from "anyone". But no such "NKVD" units accompanied American soldiers, not even 1%. We weren't being subjected to a war of racial extermination. There was no Wehrmacht on our territory killing tens of millions of us. The end of the war did not bring relief Sure it did. No Germans killing people by the tens of millions, after all. And the Soviets simply picked up where the Nazis left off. Prove it. but did bring into being the gulag system of slave labor. Then there is the issue of the Russians that welcomed the Nazis hoping to get rid of the Communists. Ukranians, although not Russians, were often A minority were. But from the vast majority, the Germans got nothing but hatred and opposition. Hence the unsustainable casualties the Germans suffered, from the very start of the war. Nyet. Byelorussians, Ukranians and Balts were quite happy to see the Nazis march into their towns...as were many Russians. Said Dr. Goebbels, and his intellectual heirs down to the present day. A group that includes you. The problem arose in the fact that there were two competing philosophies in the German military...one that wanted to "allie" with the conquered and the hardliners who took a more racist approach. Except that the guy at the top, whose opinion was the only one that counted on the matter, wanted all the "JewBolshevikRiddenSubhumanSlavs" gone. The hardliners won out. The other sort on this question counted for nothing. You know this very well Stuey so quit the smoke screen. Quel smokescreen? quite happy to see the Germans, Oh yeah, I remember the staged newsreels of people lined up neatly in front of villages and then running simultaneously towards German tanks to greet them. I don't buy anything so hokey, but it's no suprise that you do. Yes, of course. You were there and interviewed every person. Opinion, not fact. A better-grounded opinion than yours. This is why nobody should believe any of your "history". You are incapable of separating your personal bias from historical fact. Sez the source of repeated howling errors and spiteful lies. The reality is that the Germans found the most bitter, determined resistance they had run into up to that point in the war when they attacked the USSR. No. Okay Mark, when had they run into fiercer and more determined resistance up to that point in the war? When the Germans attacked the USSR, they ran and surrendered by the millions. This is historical fact. And where didn't this happen wherever the Germas attacked, up to that point in the war? Determined resitance did not happen until Stalingrad The Germans themselves didn't think so. ....and only because Stalin decided to make a meat grinder out of it i.e. the Soviets sent there to fight had no choice in the matter. Actually, Zhukov set that up, at Yelnia, in August 1941. Stopped Army Group center in its tracks, and forced the Germans into a two-Corps withdrawl. First time they had had to do one of those to that point in the war. especially remembering that Stalin's famine caused about 4 million of them to die. While Chechans were storming the Reichstag, their families back home were being deported to Siberia. And where were Japanese-Americans when Lt. Daniel Inoue was wounded in the action that got him a Distinguished Service Cross? They were be given food, clothing and shelter and protective custody. How many of those Japanese-Americans returned to Japan after the war? Another Stuey smoke screen where you try to cast one isolated incident as general policy. How much Japanese-American collaboration with Imperial Japan was there? This sounds like Stuey hipocrisy to me. Sez the spiteful liar. According to you, the Soviets were justified in committing mass murder during the Moscow panic Would you have preferred it to have gone on? but the US was wrong to gather together potential saboteurs. How many sabotage plots were found among Japanese-Americans Mark? This double standard is nothing new for you. Sez the spiteful liar who wanted to nuke a city of two million, 99.999% of whom never attacked the US, and the remainder who did were former US proteges. k.net "I hope like hell the US does use the nuclear option. It sounds like they're going to get us into another Viet Nam...screw this long engagement crap. It will just get more Americans killed. Fry the *******s. Let Kabul be the example." Stuart Wilkes |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|