![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Peter Dohm" wrote in
: "Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message ... Tina wrote in news:3de72bf8-4626-4420-8b38-9b7248d4a236 @p25g2000hsf.googlegroups.com : On Jun 11, 1:13 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Well, the airpane doesn't pitch so much largely because the slats and flaps come out together, unlike airplanes with flaps only. If you fly smoothly power changes should be minimal. We don't really flare in the same way you would in most. just a quick tug at abou t15 feet to reduce the rate of descent, but we're not supposed to grease it on for a few reasons. One, float and wasted runway. two, it gets all the spoilers and othe squat switch things going as well as the immediate availability of brakes. three, it breaks the surface tension of any water if it's a wet runway and four it gets the wheels spinning straight away. you can scuff tires badly in a greaser.. Bertie I can understand everything you said about firm landings, except the tire scuffing comment. It would seem to me landing firm would smoke the tires since they have to accelerate to the correct speed right now, where a gentle touch down would let them accelerate more slowly. A more gentle acceleration means less shear forces on the tire, so I'm missing something important. Are there any insights you can offer? Yeah. They're pretty heavy and take a bit to get spinning, so if you grease it on, you just scuff rubber off of one spot until they start rotating. It's even worse on a wet runway, where water can slice through rubber very quickly. Sounds crazy, i know. If you're at an airport where you can see the tires, it's not uncommon to see parts of tires with oval wear patches where they've worn through to the first layer of cord. That's allowed, btw. Bertie This may be mostly a function of speed. I never heard of it at the entry level, such as 150s and 172s, but the issue has been discussed from time to time in the aviation magazines--especially is there is any drag on the brakes. Yeah, speed and the mass of the things. At a guess, I'd say 737 wheels weigh in the region of 200 lbs and larger aircraft even more of course. Takes a moment ot get them going. Nothing to do with brakes, of course Bertie |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message ... Yeah, speed and the mass of the things. At a guess, I'd say 737 wheels weigh in the region of 200 lbs and larger aircraft even more of course. Takes a moment ot get them going. Nothing to do with brakes, of course Bertie 200 pounds!!!!! Guess again dumb ass. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Maxwell" luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote in news:jS04k.238$oY2.150
@newsfe21.lga: Bertie 200 pounds!!!!! Guess again dumb ass. OK, you're 300 lbs? Bertie |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
About Bertie | Eeyore[_2_] | Piloting | 50 | January 26th 08 08:04 AM |
For Bertie | Dudley Henriques[_2_] | Piloting | 58 | October 7th 07 06:10 PM |
is Bertie BWB? | oilsardine[_2_] | Piloting | 4 | May 29th 07 09:16 PM |
Anybody know who Bertie the Bunyip is? | Walt | Piloting | 21 | March 30th 07 01:58 AM |
Bertie becomes Episcopalian | B2431 | Home Built | 1 | August 13th 03 12:03 AM |