![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dan" wrote in message ... Tiger wrote: Dan wrote: Zombywoof wrote: On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 00:43:48 -0500, Dan wrote: Raymond O'Hara wrote: snip Well, the 33rd TFW took out 16 Iraqi MiGs that weren't rolling over or fleeing. They may not have been anywhere near top notch, but those 16 at least did put up a fight. Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired While not on the O'hara side of the fence, can we aggree more spending on a f22 means a delay in the F35 program? Also that increasing the number beyond 183 in the current budget environment means other Air force programs will robbed to pay for them? Certainly, with current budget constraints. That's a far cry from O'Hara's theory of bankrupting the country. He's got his mind made up and can't comprehend what is really going on around him. His personal biases block this. are you forgetting the trillion dollar war we are in that you wish to continue for ego purposes? if it were peace time, i'd be all for the F-22 but at the moment we have more pressing concerns. the chimpler has done one thing. he has made the war nothing to the home frot. you thinkthings are just business as usual and that the war doesn't cost. you are like a 17 yer old girl with a credit card. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Raymond O'Hara wrote:
"Dan" wrote in message ... Tiger wrote: Dan wrote: Zombywoof wrote: On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 00:43:48 -0500, Dan wrote: Raymond O'Hara wrote: snip Well, the 33rd TFW took out 16 Iraqi MiGs that weren't rolling over or fleeing. They may not have been anywhere near top notch, but those 16 at least did put up a fight. Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired While not on the O'hara side of the fence, can we aggree more spending on a f22 means a delay in the F35 program? Also that increasing the number beyond 183 in the current budget environment means other Air force programs will robbed to pay for them? Certainly, with current budget constraints. That's a far cry from O'Hara's theory of bankrupting the country. He's got his mind made up and can't comprehend what is really going on around him. His personal biases block this. are you forgetting the trillion dollar war we are in that you wish to continue for ego purposes? Who says I wish for the war to continue for "ego purposes?" if it were peace time, i'd be all for the F-22 but at the moment we have more pressing concerns. You still don't get it, one has nothing to do with the other. Please learn how the U.S. budget system works. the chimpler has done one thing. Your true agenda comes forth. It isn't the money that bothers you, it's the man in charge. he has made the war nothing to the home frot. Please translate that into a known language. you thinkthings are just business as usual and that the war doesn't cost. You don't seem to have read a word I have written. I have never said the war doesn't "cost." I have, however, said procurement for the war isn't the only consideration at hand. you are like a 17 yer old girl with a credit card. And you are a stoopie num-num head, so neener to you too. Feel better now? Now that we have been reduced to name calling I am going to drop this. Have a nice day. Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Logger Choice | Jamie Denton | Soaring | 10 | July 6th 07 03:13 PM |
Headset Choice | jad | Piloting | 14 | August 9th 06 07:59 AM |
Which DC Headphone is best choice? | [email protected] | Piloting | 65 | June 27th 06 11:50 PM |
!! HELP GAMERS CHOICE | Dave | Military Aviation | 2 | September 3rd 04 04:48 PM |
!!HELP GAMERS CHOICE | Dave | Soaring | 0 | September 3rd 04 12:01 AM |