![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 19, 4:30 pm, Le Chaud Lapin wrote:
A CDROM drive is one of the most complex machines ever built if one considers all what one needs to know to build it from basic components, but it can easily be had for $25US. That's the power of true commoditization. Of course, if the vendor determines that you intend to mount the drive in your Gulfstream, then adding a couple of 0's to the price would be in order. Those extra zeros reflect the cost of certification and the cost of liability insurance to protect the maker when the drive quits and the pilot loses control in IMC and crashes and the widows of his highly-paid passengers sue everyone that ever had anything to do with that airplane. Tell me how commoditization is going to fix that. Common, "commoditized" hardware can't be used on aircraft, for two reasons: There's way too much counterfeit junk on the market, and the cost of ordinary hardware is almost as bad as the cost of aircraft hardware. In the former instance, we are now sold SAE/AISI Grade 5 nuts and bolts in the hardware stores that could come from the US or from China. It all has the same head markings, but the counterfeit stuff won't make the grade and if one uses such stuff in an airplane it will come apart under stress. Grade 5 bolts are supposed to have a tensile strength of 125ksi but the cheap stuff might have half that and would shear or snap during high loads, or it might be brittle and have no margin between yield and ultimate. It might have no anticorrosion properties at all, and so it fails after pitting somewhat. That's the reason the Government aviation regulators demand that certified aircraft use only the parts listed in the manufacturer's parts manual, and the manufacturer will specify AN or NAS or MS hardware becauase it is made to a hard specification and is traceable all the way back to the manufacturer, who also has records as to where the metal came from and what its composition was and what heat treatment it received. This takes paperwork which costs money, but it minimizes the occasional unfortunate incidents where unapproved parts get into an airplane and it comes apart in flight like that Convair 580 did over Finland a few years ago when the fin came off because some crook sold the overhaul facility a counterfeit fitting that failed under load. The paperwork system was ignored somehow. The people who had those 40 relatives die in that accident would never agree with "commoditization" that could lead to an enormous increase in inflight structural failures. And as far as the cost of that hardware, the universal AN/MS/NAS hardware is not at all expensive since there are numerous companies making it. When my son was into building RC model airplanes I got him small AN hardware for less money than for the cheap junk that the hobby shops sell. A few bolts (like the landing gear bolts on the Citabria) cost around $35 for a 1/2" x 3" or so NAS bolt, but that bolt has a tensile strength of about 190ksi, something no industrial hardware reaches. Even at that those bolts get changed out every 500 hours and can be reused after NDI. A lesser bolt would fail, guaranteed, and someone would get hurt. Besides, aircraft hardware is made of nickel steel and other fancy alloys, not the plain carbon steel used in common hardware. Huge difference, and when I, a mechanic, am out flying and think about some of that critical hardware that's hold me up, I'm glad we paid more for it than we could have by using common stuff. Numerous homebuilders have designed airplanes intended to cost much less by using non-aviation parts, but they ALWAYS end up heavy and more than a little questionable. And as far as automating flight goes, flying will always require both skill and awareness unless we turn the whole thing over to computers like we did the telephone system. And I sure wouldn't want to trust such a system, especially with opportunistic terrorists around. Dan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
F-100 detail | Pjmac35 | Aviation Photos | 0 | July 26th 07 10:29 AM |
Finding "Neutral" Position on Piper Elevator/Trim Tab | [email protected] | Owning | 10 | December 7th 06 01:43 PM |
Detail pops in too late in FS2004 | CatharticF1 | Simulators | 0 | August 27th 03 03:25 AM |