![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 19:35:25 -0500, Jim Logajan
wrote in : wrote: Automatic cars don't exist and there is little likelyhood the will exist anytime in the near future. Um, you may want to start doing a bit of catch-up reading before making any further categorical statements like the above since you appear to be making claims outside your realm of knowledge or expertise. It appears you are probably unaware of current development in this area. Autonomous vehicles are probably in the near future; this is what DARPA's Grand Challenge was intended to accomplish: http://www.darpa.mil/GRANDCHALLENGE/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darpa_grand_challenge Here's a concept that should be pursued: http://www.tfhrc.gov/pubrds/pr97-12/p32.htm Actual Hands-off Steering: And Other Wonders of the Modern World by Bob Bryant This article discusses the demonstration of automated highway system technologies by the National Automated Highway System Consortium, in which the federal Highway Administration is a partner; in San Diego, Calif., on Aug 7 to 10, 1997. See "Demo '97: Proving AHS Works" of the July/August 1997 issue of Public Roads for a general description of the demonstration, its background, the demonstration scenarios, and the consortium Eight car platoon demonstrates vehicles traveling as a unit. In the platoon scenario, eight cars in a tight formation - 6.5 meters apart - at nearly 105 km/h traveled the demo course as coordinated unit with the vehicles "communicating" with each other 50 times per second. (Photo courtesy of California PATH) Demo '97 It's magic! Or so it seems -- cars driving themselves. Well, we know, it's not magic. It's very technical and explainable -- the logical culmination of years of study, development, and testing. But that doesn't detract from the wonder of it all. It's like the tricks of the master magicians and illusionists; you know that there is a logical explanation for all the apparently supernatural feats, but it is still exciting. You know the magician did not really saw the woman in half, and the Statue of Liberty did not really disappear. But we're still amazed. Even if it's not magic, the cars did drive themselves -- at least without the help of human drivers. I know that is true hecause I saw them. I even rode in three of the automated vehicles at Demo '97, the demonstration of automated high-way system (AHS) technologies in San Diego on Aug. 7 to 10, 1997. I rode in a car, a minivan, and a bus, and it was exhilarating to barrel down that 12.2-km segment of the Interstate 15 high-occupancy-vehicle lanes at 105 km/h with the drivers' feet tucked under their seats and their hands in their laps -- truly "hands-off, feet-off" driving. Even though it is a very overused cliche, I couldn't help thinking, "Look Ma, no hands -- or feet!" Demo '97, -- put on by the National Automated Highway System Consortium (NAHSC), an industry-government-academia collaboration -- was a congressionally mandated demonstration to prove that it is technically "feasible" to use these AHS technologies to significantly alleviate several of the most enduring transportation problems in the United States -- and in the rest of the world as well. AHS addresses three major concerns, explained Bill Stevens, the NAHSC Program technical director. One is safety; second is congestion; and the third is environmental problems. Each year in the United States, more than 40,000 people are killed and 5 million people are injured in automobile crashes. Because human error is a leading factor in nine out of 10 crashes and because AHS promises to significantly reduce the element of human error, AHS offers a great potential for saving lives and avoiding injuries. AHS can reduce congestion and increase mobility in several ways, but primarily, by being able to safely reduce the distance between vehicles, AHS "can double or triple the capacity of our roadways at today's legal speeds and make trips faster and trip times more reliable by avoiding the backups due to stop-and-go traffic and congestion," said Jim Rillings, former NAHSC program manager. Congestion is another leading factor in automobile crashes; so, reducing congestion will also have safety advantages. Vehicles traveling in a tight, automated platoon with about half a vehicle-length interval have a dramatic reduction in aerodynamic drag that results in a 20-percent to 25-percent improvement in fuel economy and emissions reduction. AHS will also have great economic advantages. Today's vehicles are about as crash-worthy as it is possible to make them within reasonable cost. Therefore, the automobile companies, as well as the federal government, are now turning to crash avoidance as a way of avoiding injuries and death and also as way of saving economic losses due to crashes, which amount to approximately $150 billion per year. The economic losses due to highway congestion are in the neighborhood of $50 billion per year. Adding those up, a sizable amount of money is lost each year due to motor vehicle crashes and congestion," Rillings said. Different approaches to AHS were showcased in seven different "scenarios" during the demo. Cutting-edge technologies to provide adaptive cruise control, collision warning, obstacle avoidance, lane departure warning, and lateral and longitudinal control (steering and interval) were used to show variations on an AHS of the future. The 1,350 passengers who rode in the Demo '97 vehicles were the first people to experience s... It appears that it is being pursued by come capable folks: http://www.path.berkeley.edu/PATH/Publications/Videos/ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry Dighera wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 19:35:25 -0500, Jim Logajan wrote in : wrote: Automatic cars don't exist and there is little likelyhood the will exist anytime in the near future. Um, you may want to start doing a bit of catch-up reading before making any further categorical statements like the above since you appear to be making claims outside your realm of knowledge or expertise. It appears you are probably unaware of current development in this area. Autonomous vehicles are probably in the near future; this is what DARPA's Grand Challenge was intended to accomplish: http://www.darpa.mil/GRANDCHALLENGE/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darpa_grand_challenge Here's a concept that should be pursued: http://www.tfhrc.gov/pubrds/pr97-12/p32.htm Actual Hands-off Steering: And Other Wonders of the Modern World Yep, it was done then abandoned as being impractical to implement in the real world. It worked real good in a closed and monitored test area if you don't mind spending a fortune. The test area is now a reversible lane just north of San Diego. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry Dighera wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 19:35:25 -0500, Jim Logajan wrote in : wrote: Automatic cars don't exist and there is little likelyhood the will exist anytime in the near future. Um, you may want to start doing a bit of catch-up reading before making any further categorical statements like the above since you appear to be making claims outside your realm of knowledge or expertise. It appears you are probably unaware of current development in this area. Autonomous vehicles are probably in the near future; this is what DARPA's Grand Challenge was intended to accomplish: http://www.darpa.mil/GRANDCHALLENGE/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darpa_grand_challenge Here's a concept that should be pursued: http://www.tfhrc.gov/pubrds/pr97-12/p32.htm Actual Hands-off Steering: And Other Wonders of the Modern World And unless you replace the entire fleet of autos on the road all it takes is one asshole in his old Chevy to screw the system. Look how long it has taken the FCC to get around to cutting off analog TV and all it takes to deal with that is s $40 converter box. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gig 601Xl Builder wrote:
Larry Dighera wrote: On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 19:35:25 -0500, Jim Logajan wrote in : wrote: Automatic cars don't exist and there is little likelyhood the will exist anytime in the near future. Um, you may want to start doing a bit of catch-up reading before making any further categorical statements like the above since you appear to be making claims outside your realm of knowledge or expertise. It appears you are probably unaware of current development in this area. Autonomous vehicles are probably in the near future; this is what DARPA's Grand Challenge was intended to accomplish: http://www.darpa.mil/GRANDCHALLENGE/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darpa_grand_challenge Here's a concept that should be pursued: http://www.tfhrc.gov/pubrds/pr97-12/p32.htm Actual Hands-off Steering: And Other Wonders of the Modern World And unless you replace the entire fleet of autos on the road all it takes is one asshole in his old Chevy to screw the system. Which is just one of the reasons the whole thing was abandoned as impractical. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 23, 11:55*am, wrote:
Gig 601Xl Builder wrote: Here's a concept that should be pursued: * *http://www.tfhrc.gov/pubrds/pr97-12/p32.htm * * Actual Hands-off Steering: * * And Other Wonders of the Modern World And unless you replace the entire fleet of autos on the road all it takes is one asshole in his old Chevy to screw the system. Which is just one of the reasons the whole thing was abandoned as impractical. It is notable that aviation is not as prone to the all-or-nothing dilema. Advanced PAV's would have to share the sky with convention aircraft, but the danger of cohabitation is not as siginificant as hands-of-steering. -Le Chaud Lapin- |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Le Chaud Lapin wrote:
On Jun 23, 11:55 am, wrote: Gig 601Xl Builder wrote: Here's a concept that should be pursued: http://www.tfhrc.gov/pubrds/pr97-12/p32.htm Actual Hands-off Steering: And Other Wonders of the Modern World And unless you replace the entire fleet of autos on the road all it takes is one asshole in his old Chevy to screw the system. Which is just one of the reasons the whole thing was abandoned as impractical. It is notable that aviation is not as prone to the all-or-nothing dilema. Advanced PAV's would have to share the sky with convention aircraft, but the danger of cohabitation is not as siginificant as hands-of-steering. -Le Chaud Lapin- I don't know what you mean by "hands-of-steering." But, Think about what surrounds the nation's largest cities. Let me help. The nation's busiest airspace. Now guess what is on the ground in and around the nation's largest cities? The nation's busiest roads. Now think if all the things on the road started flying in the sky. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In rec.aviation.piloting Jim Logajan wrote:
wrote: Automatic cars don't exist and there is little likelyhood the will exist anytime in the near future. Um, you may want to start doing a bit of catch-up reading before making any further categorical statements like the above since you appear to be making claims outside your realm of knowledge or expertise. It appears you are probably unaware of current development in this area. Autonomous vehicles are probably in the near future; this is what DARPA's Grand Challenge was intended to accomplish: http://www.darpa.mil/GRANDCHALLENGE/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darpa_grand_challenge I work with Traffic Engineers, state DOT's and FHWA on a regular basis. Automated traffic crap IS my area of expertise. I'm well aware of what is out there and the experimental projects. The statement stands. If you believe it is just around the corner, somewhere I have a Popular Mechanics from the 1930's that says the same thing you might like to read. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 03:15:03 GMT, wrote in
: I work with Traffic Engineers You must know Jerry Crabill and Tramm Hartzog. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Logajan wrote:
wrote: Automatic cars don't exist and there is little likelyhood the will exist anytime in the near future. Um, you may want to start doing a bit of catch-up reading before making any further categorical statements like the above since you appear to be making claims outside your realm of knowledge or expertise. It appears you are probably unaware of current development in this area. Autonomous vehicles are probably in the near future; this is what DARPA's Grand Challenge was intended to accomplish: http://www.darpa.mil/GRANDCHALLENGE/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darpa_grand_challenge Those aren't for road use. Remember what the D in DARPA stands for. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FA: 1-Day-Left: 3 Advanced AVIATION Books: Aviation Electronics, Air Transportation, Aircraft Control and Simulation | Mel[_2_] | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | September 8th 07 01:37 PM |
FA: 3 Advanced AVIATION Books: Aviation Electronics, Air Transportation, Aircraft Control and Simulation | Derek | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | September 3rd 07 02:17 AM |
FA: 1-Day-Left: 3 AVIATION Books: Aviation Electronics, Air Transportation, Aircraft Control and Simulation | Jeff[_5_] | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | September 1st 07 12:45 PM |
FA: 3 AVIATION Books: Aviation Electronics, Air Transportation, Aircraft Control and Simulation | Jon[_4_] | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | August 24th 07 01:13 AM |
FA: 3 ADVANCED AVIATION Books: Aviation Electronics, Air Transportation, Aircraft Control and Simulation | Larry[_3_] | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | August 6th 07 02:23 AM |