Bush Threatens Veto Of Any Bills That Don't Include User Fees For Everyone Talking To ATC!

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
m...
Mike wrote:

SS was a great idea. It's original intent was simply to insure old
people wouldn't be eating out of trash cans, which was widespread at
the time. Of course, I happen to think old people eating out of
trash cans isn't a great idea. If you don't share that sentiment, I
can certainly understand why you'd think SS wasn't a great idea.


You're wrong, SS was always a bad idea. Great ideas don't have to be
forced on people, SS does not insure old people won't be eating out of
trash cans, and there's no Constitutional authority for it.

I suppose if one subscribes to the Wesley Snipes school of
"Constitutional(sic) authority", you might think so.

I don't.

Mike wrote:

You're wrong, SS was always a bad idea. Great ideas don't have to be
forced on people, SS does not insure old people won't be eating out
of trash cans, and there's no Constitutional authority for it.

I suppose if one subscribes to the Wesley Snipes school of
"Constitutional(sic) authority", you might think so.

I don't.


What school of Constitutional authority do you subscribe to, if any?

What do you believe "sic" means?

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
m...
Mike wrote:

You're wrong, SS was always a bad idea. Great ideas don't have to be
forced on people, SS does not insure old people won't be eating out
of trash cans, and there's no Constitutional authority for it.

I suppose if one subscribes to the Wesley Snipes school of
"Constitutional(sic) authority", you might think so.

I don't.


What school of Constitutional authority do you subscribe to, if any?

Not the same one you do, obviously.

What do you believe "sic" means?

Are you really that dense?

Mike wrote:
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
m...
Mike wrote:

You're wrong, SS was always a bad idea. Great ideas don't have to
be forced on people, SS does not insure old people won't be eating
out of trash cans, and there's no Constitutional authority for it.

I suppose if one subscribes to the Wesley Snipes school of
"Constitutional(sic) authority", you might think so.

I don't.


What school of Constitutional authority do you subscribe to, if any?

Not the same one you do, obviously.


Obviously.



What do you believe "sic" means?


Are you really that dense?


I'm not at all dense. Your usage suggests you don't know what it means.

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
m...
Mike wrote:
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
m...
Mike wrote:

You're wrong, SS was always a bad idea. Great ideas don't have to
be forced on people, SS does not insure old people won't be eating
out of trash cans, and there's no Constitutional authority for it.

I suppose if one subscribes to the Wesley Snipes school of
"Constitutional(sic) authority", you might think so.

I don't.


What school of Constitutional authority do you subscribe to, if any?

Not the same one you do, obviously.


Obviously.



What do you believe "sic" means?


Are you really that dense?


I'm not at all dense. Your usage suggests you don't know what it means.

I know exactly what it means, Mr. expert, and it was used quite correctly
regardless of what you think. A simple grammatical error is certainly
excusable, but continuing to repeat errors after they have been pointed out
demonstrates not only ignorance, but stupidity. If you want to remain
subliterate, that's your business. Don't let me stop you. Live like you
wanna live.

Mike wrote:
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
m...
Mike wrote:
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
m...
Mike wrote:

You're wrong, SS was always a bad idea. Great ideas don't have
to be forced on people, SS does not insure old people won't be
eating out of trash cans, and there's no Constitutional
authority for it.

I suppose if one subscribes to the Wesley Snipes school of
"Constitutional(sic) authority", you might think so.

I don't.


What school of Constitutional authority do you subscribe to, if
any?

Not the same one you do, obviously.


Obviously.



What do you believe "sic" means?


Are you really that dense?


I'm not at all dense. Your usage suggests you don't know what it
means.

I know exactly what it means, Mr. expert, and it was used quite
correctly regardless of what you think. A simple grammatical error
is certainly excusable, but continuing to repeat errors after they
have been pointed out demonstrates not only ignorance, but stupidity.
If you want to remain subliterate, that's your business. Don't let
me stop you. Live like you wanna live.


What simple grammatical error?

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
news
Mike wrote:
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
m...
Mike wrote:
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
m...
Mike wrote:

You're wrong, SS was always a bad idea. Great ideas don't have
to be forced on people, SS does not insure old people won't be
eating out of trash cans, and there's no Constitutional
authority for it.

I suppose if one subscribes to the Wesley Snipes school of
"Constitutional(sic) authority", you might think so.

I don't.


What school of Constitutional authority do you subscribe to, if
any?

Not the same one you do, obviously.


Obviously.



What do you believe "sic" means?


Are you really that dense?


I'm not at all dense. Your usage suggests you don't know what it
means.

I know exactly what it means, Mr. expert, and it was used quite
correctly regardless of what you think. A simple grammatical error
is certainly excusable, but continuing to repeat errors after they
have been pointed out demonstrates not only ignorance, but stupidity.
If you want to remain subliterate, that's your business. Don't let
me stop you. Live like you wanna live.


What simple grammatical error?

Am I your literacy coach now?

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:

What do you believe "sic" means?


Are you really that dense?


I'm not at all dense. Your usage suggests you don't know what it means.

You really are slipping, McNicoll.

This is another sign.

--
Dan

T182T at 4R4

On Jun 30, 3:11*pm, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote:
Mike wrote:

What school of Constitutional authority do you subscribe to, if any?


The 10th amendment..
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution,
nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States
respectively, or to the people." No where in the constitution does it
authorize a Social Security program.

-Robert

Robert M. Gary wrote:

The 10th amendment..
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution,
nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States
respectively, or to the people." No where in the constitution does it
authorize a Social Security program.

This was settled by the Supreme Court on May 24, 1937. Look it up.