Bush Threatens Veto Of Any Bills That Don't Include User Fees For Everyone Talking To ATC!

Robert M. Gary wrote:
On Jun 30, 2:25 pm, Larry Dighera wrote:

So it would appear that Obama proposal would result in the wealthy
assisting in funding seniors.

"Wealthy"!! . OMG I'm on the floor laughing. $102,000/yr is now
wealthy, that's awesome,


Why, here in Oregon where the average income for a family of four in
2007 was $61,250, those people who make $102,000 are simply starving to
DEATH.


-c

On Jun 30, 3:36*pm, gatt wrote:

Why, here in Oregon where the average income for a family of four in
2007 was $61,250, those people who make $102,000 are simply starving to
DEATH.

Wait, I'm not following. What does average income have to do with
wealthy income levels?

-Robert

"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message
...
On Jun 30, 3:36 pm, gatt wrote:

Why, here in Oregon where the average income for a family of four in
2007 was $61,250, those people who make $102,000 are simply starving to
DEATH.

Wait, I'm not following. What does average income have to do with
wealthy income levels?

Everything?

What does SS have to do with user fees?

On Jun 30, 3:57*pm, "Mike" wrote:

Everything?

What does SS have to do with user fees?

You apparently didn't read the first threads. The question was why
isn't anyone talking about the effect of user fees in Obama is elected
and the response is that we assume all taxes will go up as he has said
SS will. Gees, keep up on your own, don't make me spoon feed you.

-robert

"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message
...
On Jun 30, 3:57 pm, "Mike" wrote:

Everything?

What does SS have to do with user fees?

You apparently didn't read the first threads. The question was why
isn't anyone talking about the effect of user fees in Obama is elected
and the response is that we assume all taxes will go up as he has said
SS will. Gees, keep up on your own, don't make me spoon feed you.

You can't even keep up with what YOU said, Mr. economic expert.

There you go with that "we" again.

What is your pocket mouse's name, so at least I can have an idea of whom
you're referring.

Robert M. Gary wrote:
On Jun 30, 3:36 pm, gatt wrote:


"Wealthy"!! . OMG I'm on the floor laughing. $102,000/yr is
now wealthy, that's awesome,


Why, here in Oregon where the average income for a family of four in
2007 was $61,250, those people who make $102,000 are simply starving to
DEATH.


Wait, I'm not following.


No ****.


What does average income have to do with wealthy income levels?

You're the MBA. Do the math.


-c