Bush Threatens Veto Of Any Bills That Don't Include User Fees For Everyone Talking To ATC!

"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message
...
On Jun 30, 3:02 pm, "Mike" wrote:

"Wealthy"!! . OMG I'm on the floor laughing. $102,000/yr is now
wealthy, that's awesome, I'll have to remember that one. You probably
couldn't even get a lone for a Cessna 172 on $102,000/yr.

Let's see here. Less than 5% of the population makes more than $102K.
It's
probably closer to 3-4%.

What does 5% have to do with the fact that Obama said he's going to
increase SS taxes? Are you saying that if the tax doesn't affect you
its not a tax?

First answer my questions rather than snipping them and then we'll work on
yours. Fair enough?

On Jun 30, 3:53*pm, "Mike" wrote:
"Robert M. Gary" wrote in ...

First answer my questions rather than snipping them and then we'll work on
yours. *Fair enough?

Certainly not 1 in 20! If 1 in 20 Americans are wealthy (as you say)
we're pretty amazing.

-Robert

"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message
...
On Jun 30, 3:53 pm, "Mike" wrote:
"Robert M. Gary" wrote in
...

First answer my questions rather than snipping them and then we'll work
on
yours. Fair enough?

Certainly not 1 in 20! If 1 in 20 Americans are wealthy (as you say)
we're pretty amazing.

Actually it's closer to 1 in 25, but now at least we have an idea of your
take.

Now, do you question my assumption that 90% of the population would consider
someone making that kind of money wealthy?

On Jun 30, 5:01*pm, "Mike" wrote:

Now, do you question my assumption that 90% of the population would consider
someone making that kind of money wealthy?

yea, I think if you asked people "Who much money would you have to
make a year to be wealthy?" They would say something like $500,000 or
$1,000,000.

"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message
...
On Jun 30, 5:01 pm, "Mike" wrote:

Now, do you question my assumption that 90% of the population would
consider
someone making that kind of money wealthy?

yea, I think

That's where you went wrong.

http://www.cnn.com/2005/ALLPOLITICS/...ocialsecurity/

Robert M. Gary wrote:
On Jun 30, 5:01 pm, "Mike" wrote:


Now, do you question my assumption that 90% of the population would consider
someone making that kind of money wealthy?


yea, I think if you asked people "Who much money would you have to
make a year to be wealthy?" They would say something like $500,000 or
$1,000,000.

*cackle*

That's amusing.

-c

Mike wrote:

"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message
...

On Jun 30, 3:53 pm, "Mike" wrote:
"Robert M. Gary" wrote in
...


First answer my questions rather than snipping them and then we'll
work on
yours. Fair enough?

Certainly not 1 in 20! If 1 in 20 Americans are wealthy (as you say)
we're pretty amazing.

Actually it's closer to 1 in 25, but now at least we have an idea of
your take.

On a wider basis, just about everyone in the USA can be considered
somewhat "wealthy."

http://www.globalrichlist.com/index.php

Now, do you question my assumption that 90% of the population would
consider someone making that kind of money wealthy?

I sure as hell don't, but you know how reality is biased that way.

yeedyeegiiss wrote
in :

Mike wrote:

"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message

...

On Jun 30, 3:53 pm, "Mike" wrote:
"Robert M. Gary" wrote in

oups.com...


First answer my questions rather than snipping them and then we'll
work on
yours. Fair enough?

Certainly not 1 in 20! If 1 in 20 Americans are wealthy (as you say)
we're pretty amazing.

Actually it's closer to 1 in 25, but now at least we have an idea of
your take.

On a wider basis, just about everyone in the USA can be considered
somewhat "wealthy."

http://www.globalrichlist.com/index.php

Now, do you question my assumption that 90% of the population would
consider someone making that kind of money wealthy?

I sure as hell don't, but you know how reality is biased that way.

Nothing to do with reality. That's strictly s relative point of view thing.

http://www.boston.com/news/world/art...earnings_world
wide/



in any case, the only wealthy man is one who doesn't want..



Bertie