Bush Threatens Veto Of Any Bills That Don't Include User Fees For Everyone Talking To ATC!

I have yet to hear how you claim this is not a tax
increase.

Then why do you keep pretending I did? *All I did was to take issue with the
accuracy of YOUR claim, Mr. economic expert.

What claim? I said "Obama has pre-announced that the payroll tax
we are paying will increase". I even sent you a link. Now you are
somehow trying to claim that charging more a year in social security
tax is not an increase in payroll tax. I"m still waiting for you to
find a response to that. I guess you can't since you just change the
subject.

-Robret

"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message
...

I have yet to hear how you claim this is not a tax
increase.

Then why do you keep pretending I did? All I did was to take issue with
the
accuracy of YOUR claim, Mr. economic expert.

What claim? I said "Obama has pre-announced that the payroll tax
we are paying will increase". I even sent you a link. Now you are
somehow trying to claim that charging more a year in social security
tax is not an increase in payroll tax. I"m still waiting for you to
find a response to that. I guess you can't since you just change the
subject.

For someone who claims to be a legal expert, you sure are weak on literacy.

By saying "we" any reasonable person would infer you meant 'everyone' since
you clearly didn't define "we".

As I said, Mr. economic/legal expert, either you were ignorant that Obama's
proposal didn't even come close to meaning 'everyone', or you were clearly
behaving in a duplicitous manner.

So which is it?

There are no other conclusions.

Why are you so afraid to answer that question?