![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Paul J. Adam" wrote in message ... In message , Kevin Brooks writes As to air-to-ground use, I believe the resident Strike Eagle driver has already provided a reason for retaining a strafe capability, i.e., recent operations in Afghanistan. During Anaconda the need for up-close-and-personal support (read that as well within the danger-close margin) was reported. You can't *always* use your LGB's or JDAM's, which is why the grunts liked the cannon armed aircraft during that fight. Are there no gun pods? This has always been a capability that can be bolted onto aircraft as necessary. Gun pods are great draggy things that really cut in to performance. If you were designing the capability from scratch, would you insist on the M61? Consider a larger-calibre weapon with more A/G punch like a KCA? Or go for fuel and/or lightness, and hang a podded gun for 'danger close' missions? The problem is that those danger close missions tend to be unpredicted by their nature otherwise we would simply avoid the great majority all together. And in many cases arming up a plane specifically to fly one -say in Qatar- and getting it on station -oh, over Afghanistan- is going to take too long. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AIM-54 Phoenix missile | Sujay Vijayendra | Military Aviation | 89 | November 3rd 03 09:47 PM |
P-39's, zeros, etc. | old hoodoo | Military Aviation | 12 | July 23rd 03 05:48 AM |