F-16 Encounters in MOA

In article
,
"Robert M. Gary" wrote:

On Jul 14, 7:49*am, Gig 601Xl Builder
wrote:

I'm hardly a military basher but in this case the civilian pilot did try
to see an avoid and that is what caused the problem. He was listening to
his TCAS and doing what it said. The F16 pilot should have realized this
when the civilian started maneuvering and broken off the intercept.

Yea, it would seem that the only see-and-avoid you can fault the
civilian pilot with is not having the capability to out perform the
F-16 as he tried to escape the collision alert.

I fail to see how a 90-degree clearing turn would not have brought the
threat into view and provided an escape to resolve the TCAS warning.

John Smith writes:

I fail to see how a 90-degree clearing turn would not have brought the
threat into view and provided an escape to resolve the TCAS warning.

Civilian pilots are not normally taught how to recognize and evade "threats."

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
John Smith writes:

I fail to see how a 90-degree clearing turn would not have brought the
threat into view and provided an escape to resolve the TCAS warning.

Civilian pilots are not normally taught how to recognize and evade
"threats."

Like you would know ANYTHING about civilian pilots, dumb ass.

Mxsmanic wrote:
John Smith writes:

I fail to see how a 90-degree clearing turn would not have brought the
threat into view and provided an escape to resolve the TCAS warning.

Civilian pilots are not normally taught how to recognize and evade "threats."

See there you go Antony. I even took up for you up thread and then you
say something stupid like this.

Civilian pilots from the newest student pilot to the guys flying 747s
are taught to and evade threats.

Gig 601Xl Builder writes:

Civilian pilots from the newest student pilot to the guys flying 747s
are taught to and evade threats.

Hazards, not threats.

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Gig 601Xl Builder writes:

Civilian pilots from the newest student pilot to the guys flying 747s
are taught to and evade threats.

Hazards, not threats.


Anthony, you are very determined to demonstrate to the world that you are a
moron.

Mxsmanic wrote:
Gig 601Xl Builder writes:

Civilian pilots from the newest student pilot to the guys flying 747s
are taught to and evade threats.

Hazards, not threats.

#1 Anthony method of not being wrong: Make up his own definitions of words.

threat (thrĕt) n.
1. An expression of an intention to inflict pain, injury, evil, or
punishment.
2. An indication of impending danger or harm.
3. One that is regarded as a possible danger; a menace.

haz·ard (hăz'ərd) n.
1. A chance; an accident.
2. A chance of being injured or harmed; danger: Space travel is full of
hazards.
3. A possible source of danger: a fire hazard.
4. Games. A dice game similar to craps.
5. Sports. An obstacle, such as a sand trap, found on a golf course.

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

John Smith writes:

I fail to see how a 90-degree clearing turn would not have brought
the threat into view and provided an escape to resolve the TCAS
warning.

Civilian pilots are not normally taught how to recognize and evade
"threats."

Bull ****. You don't know anything about aviation, Anthony. You're an
idiot.

Civilian pilots are not normally taught how to recognize and evade
"threats."


Whoever wrote that is either not a pilot, needs to have his license
revoked, or is just talking out of his ass. I don't even need to guess
who wrote it.

"See and Avoid" procedures are one of the "special emphasis areas" in
flight instruction.

-c

On Jul 21, 12:15*pm, gatt wrote:
Civilian pilots are not normally taught how to recognize and evade
"threats."

Whoever wrote that is either not a pilot, needs to have his license
revoked, or is just talking out of his ass. *I don't even need to guess
who wrote it.

"See and Avoid" procedures are one of the "special emphasis areas" in
flight instruction.

-c

Anthony is the Bill Clinton of the group -- the words mean whatever he
wants them to mean.