![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 21, 1:12*pm, PMSC Member wrote:
On Jul 21, 3:27 pm, Darryl Ramm wrote: On Jul 21, 12:11 pm, PMSC Member wrote: On Jul 21, 12:53 pm, sisu1a wrote: An SSA 'Master' CFIG I know is perpetually hammering it into his students that to initiate a turn in a glider, the FIRST thing you do is feed in rudder. [snip] If true, this guy ought to have his CFIG revoked. End of story. And that would be why? You'd be revoking a lot of CFIG tickets. Along with emphasizing the importance of foot work, hopefully he's talked about the dangers of over ruddering and stall/spin accidents and talked about how different gliders handle and may or may not really benefit from early rudder application. And hopefully he really works on decreases focus on programatic things and transitions students to developing a feel for flying these gliders. Darryl Let's not wander too far afield and make assumptions about what a great guy this CFIG might otherwise be. *We've been told he teaches *student pilots* "that to initiate a turn in a glider, the FIRST thing you do is feed in rudder." We all know there are certain gliders that, under certain circumstances, are best flown with leading rudder. *Typically, we're talking about a glass ship with heavy wings (esp. with water) and thermal entry at thermaling speed, at altitude. Not trainers. Not students. Not if the spoilers are open. Not in the pattern. Not at low agl altitude under any circumstance. Is is REALLY necessary to review the stats on stall/spin accidents, AGAIN? I have never in 20 odd years met an instructor that teaches students this way, and have great difficulty believing this is as common as you suggest. This doesn't worry you? *You don't understand the problem. *And you aren't going to figure it out reading usenet :-). *See a good CFIG. The idea that any CFIG would teach this way frankly astounds me. *I regard it as malpractice of the very worst sort. The fact that various people on this group report this as a not uncommon practice troubles me. *To the extent that this is true, it supports the allegation that many pilots simply don't have the knowledge to fly safely. Look, I was replying to you wandering afield and assuming the guy is clueless and ought to have his ticked yanked. He could be the worse instructor around, he might be the best. The point is just picking on one statement does not prove anything. I laid out what sort of discussion/other issues I'd expect a CFIG to raise. It is probably useless to try to discuss somebody's professional teaching skills by saying "he says X". I kind of doubt the discussion starts and ends there with no more conversation with the student. What else does he say? What caveats does he place on this? What does he demonstrate to students, what practical lesson approach and drills does he have students do to improve their feel for turn coordination, what is his approach to incipient spin and spin training, etc. Oops we don't know any of that but hell lets take away the guys ticket since somebody says he says something. Spouting off your opinion on usenet and then denegrating any opinions on usenet is kind of amusing. Darryl (who leads with rudder frequently) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 21, 5:12 pm, Darryl Ramm wrote:
On Jul 21, 1:12 pm, PMSC Member wrote: On Jul 21, 3:27 pm, Darryl Ramm wrote: On Jul 21, 12:11 pm, PMSC Member wrote: On Jul 21, 12:53 pm, sisu1a wrote: An SSA 'Master' CFIG I know is perpetually hammering it into his students that to initiate a turn in a glider, the FIRST thing you do is feed in rudder. [snip] If true, this guy ought to have his CFIG revoked. End of story. And that would be why? You'd be revoking a lot of CFIG tickets. Along with emphasizing the importance of foot work, hopefully he's talked about the dangers of over ruddering and stall/spin accidents and talked about how different gliders handle and may or may not really benefit from early rudder application. And hopefully he really works on decreases focus on programatic things and transitions students to developing a feel for flying these gliders. Darryl Let's not wander too far afield and make assumptions about what a great guy this CFIG might otherwise be. We've been told he teaches *student pilots* "that to initiate a turn in a glider, the FIRST thing you do is feed in rudder." We all know there are certain gliders that, under certain circumstances, are best flown with leading rudder. Typically, we're talking about a glass ship with heavy wings (esp. with water) and thermal entry at thermaling speed, at altitude. Not trainers. Not students. Not if the spoilers are open. Not in the pattern. Not at low agl altitude under any circumstance. Is is REALLY necessary to review the stats on stall/spin accidents, AGAIN? I have never in 20 odd years met an instructor that teaches students this way, and have great difficulty believing this is as common as you suggest. This doesn't worry you? You don't understand the problem. And you aren't going to figure it out reading usenet :-). See a good CFIG. The idea that any CFIG would teach this way frankly astounds me. I regard it as malpractice of the very worst sort. The fact that various people on this group report this as a not uncommon practice troubles me. To the extent that this is true, it supports the allegation that many pilots simply don't have the knowledge to fly safely. Look, I was replying to you wandering afield and assuming the guy is clueless and ought to have his ticked yanked. He could be the worse instructor around, he might be the best. The point is just picking on one statement does not prove anything. I laid out what sort of discussion/other issues I'd expect a CFIG to raise. It is probably useless to try to discuss somebody's professional teaching skills by saying "he says X". I kind of doubt the discussion starts and ends there with no more conversation with the student. What else does he say? What caveats does he place on this? What does he demonstrate to students, what practical lesson approach and drills does he have students do to improve their feel for turn coordination, what is his approach to incipient spin and spin training, etc. Oops we don't know any of that but hell lets take away the guys ticket since somebody says he says something. Spouting off your opinion on usenet and then denegrating any opinions on usenet is kind of amusing. Darryl (who leads with rudder frequently) Well I see you have this completely figured out. You certainly read a lot more into this exchange than I (or anyone else) wrote, so this is the end of it for me. Good luck & good soaring to you. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Coordinated turns without rudder, and autopilots | Mxsmanic | Piloting | 188 | June 1st 07 07:09 PM |
Question: Standard rate turns, constant rate turns, and airspeed | Robert Barker | Piloting | 5 | April 15th 07 04:47 PM |
Is rudder required for coordinated turns? | Mxsmanic | Piloting | 41 | September 24th 06 06:40 PM |
Efis and other leading technology | Mark | Instrument Flight Rules | 13 | January 26th 05 09:16 PM |
leading edge flaps | Arquebus257WeaMag | Military Aviation | 105 | January 14th 04 04:11 AM |