![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
§ñühwØ£f writes:
I would a55ume that they have planes in the air at some point and the aircraft report the ceiling height of teh clouds and then they estimate windspeed from observaton stations on the ground. I'm just guessing. I knew a weather observer once. That makes sense. I wonder how they estimate things like heights and distances, though. I suppose experience would help to come up with educated guesses for these, but one might still be way off. Certainly experience would be useful in recognizing specific cloud types and patterns. One article I read (I think it was Wikipedia) mentioned just ten radiosondes for the entire Caribbean, that's hardly what I'd call high-resolution measurement. You could almost fit a hurricane between radiosondes. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: §ñühwØ£f writes: I would a55ume that they have planes in the air at some point and the aircraft report the ceiling height of teh clouds and then they estimate windspeed from observaton stations on the ground. I'm just guessing. I knew a weather observer once. That makes sense. I wonder how they estimate things like heights and distances, though. I suppose experience would help to come up with educated guesses for these, but one might still be way off. Certainly experience would be useful in recognizing specific cloud types and patterns. One article I read (I think it was Wikipedia) mentioned just ten radiosondes for the entire Caribbean, that's hardly what I'd call high-resolution measurement. You could almost fit a hurricane between radiosondes. You are an idiot. Bertie |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 01:27:31 +0000, Bertie the Bunyip aided th' terraists
with the following claims : Mxsmanic wrote in : §ñühwØ£f writes: I would a55ume that they have planes in the air at some point and the aircraft report the ceiling height of teh clouds and then they estimate windspeed from observaton stations on the ground. I'm just guessing. I knew a weather observer once. That makes sense. I wonder how they estimate things like heights and distances, though. I suppose experience would help to come up with educated guesses for these, but one might still be way off. Certainly experience would be useful in recognizing specific cloud types and patterns. One article I read (I think it was Wikipedia) mentioned just ten radiosondes for the entire Caribbean, that's hardly what I'd call high-resolution measurement. You could almost fit a hurricane between radiosondes. You are an idiot. Bertie Maybe they use dopplar radar to tell the height of the clouds, eh? Otherwise I assume some sort of math involving triangulation and other difficult things. ![]() -- "Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities" - Voltaire http://www.smirkingchimp.com/thread/16052 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
§ñühwØ£f wrote in
news ![]() On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 01:27:31 +0000, Bertie the Bunyip aided th' terraists with the following claims : Mxsmanic wrote in : §ñühwØ£f writes: I would a55ume that they have planes in the air at some point and the aircraft report the ceiling height of teh clouds and then they estimate windspeed from observaton stations on the ground. I'm just guessing. I knew a weather observer once. That makes sense. I wonder how they estimate things like heights and distances, though. I suppose experience would help to come up with educated guesses for these, but one might still be way off. Certainly experience would be useful in recognizing specific cloud types and patterns. One article I read (I think it was Wikipedia) mentioned just ten radiosondes for the entire Caribbean, that's hardly what I'd call high-resolution measurement. You could almost fit a hurricane between radiosondes. You are an idiot. Bertie Maybe they use dopplar radar to tell the height of the clouds, eh? Otherwise I assume some sort of math involving triangulation and other difficult things. ![]() Nah, it's easy. They compare the temperature to the dewpoint add in th edry adiabatic lapse rate and voila, you get the cloudbase. Observation is used for terminal areas, otherwise, though, it's still done the old fashioned way for the most part. These days, al info is mixed together, whihc gives a much better actual and forecasting capability. bertie |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
§ñühwØ£f wrote in news ![]() On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 01:27:31 +0000, Bertie the Bunyip aided th' terraists with the following claims : Mxsmanic wrote in : §ñühwØ£f writes: I would a55ume that they have planes in the air at some point and the aircraft report the ceiling height of teh clouds and then they estimate windspeed from observaton stations on the ground. I'm just guessing. I knew a weather observer once. That makes sense. I wonder how they estimate things like heights and distances, though. I suppose experience would help to come up with educated guesses for these, but one might still be way off. Certainly experience would be useful in recognizing specific cloud types and patterns. One article I read (I think it was Wikipedia) mentioned just ten radiosondes for the entire Caribbean, that's hardly what I'd call high-resolution measurement. You could almost fit a hurricane between radiosondes. You are an idiot. Bertie Maybe they use dopplar radar to tell the height of the clouds, eh? Otherwise I assume some sort of math involving triangulation and other difficult things. ![]() Nah, it's easy. They compare the temperature to the dewpoint add in th edry adiabatic lapse rate and voila, you get the cloudbase. Observation is used for terminal areas, otherwise, though, it's still done the old fashioned way for the most part. These days, al info is mixed together, whihc gives a much better actual and forecasting capability. bertie Are you an ex weather observer or summat? I had a friend who was ex USAF weather observer then he got a job in elko doing weather observation & moved ![]() He was always talking about clouds & stuff trying to explain what was happening up there... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
§ñühw¤£f wrote in
: Bertie the Bunyip wrote: §ñühwØ£f wrote in news ![]() On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 01:27:31 +0000, Bertie the Bunyip aided th' terraists with the following claims : Mxsmanic wrote in : §ñühwØ£f writes: I would a55ume that they have planes in the air at some point and the aircraft report the ceiling height of teh clouds and then they estimate windspeed from observaton stations on the ground. I'm just guessing. I knew a weather observer once. That makes sense. I wonder how they estimate things like heights and distances, though. I suppose experience would help to come up with educated guesses for these, but one might still be way off. Certainly experience would be useful in recognizing specific cloud types and patterns. One article I read (I think it was Wikipedia) mentioned just ten radiosondes for the entire Caribbean, that's hardly what I'd call high-resolution measurement. You could almost fit a hurricane between radiosondes. You are an idiot. Bertie Maybe they use dopplar radar to tell the height of the clouds, eh? Otherwise I assume some sort of math involving triangulation and other difficult things. ![]() Nah, it's easy. They compare the temperature to the dewpoint add in th edry adiabatic lapse rate and voila, you get the cloudbase. Observation is used for terminal areas, otherwise, though, it's still done the old fashioned way for the most part. These days, al info is mixed together, whihc gives a much better actual and forecasting capability. bertie Are you an ex weather observer or summat? I had a friend who was ex USAF weather observer then he got a job in elko doing weather observation & moved ![]() He was always talking about clouds & stuff trying to explain what was happening up there... Nah,, I'm a pilot. We have to learn the basics of how it's done. It's interesting, but not riveting for me, anyhow. Handy to know a bit abou tit in my line of work, though. Bertie |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 00:17:32 +0000, Bertie the Bunyip aided th' terraists
with the following claims : §ñühw¤£f wrote in : Bertie the Bunyip wrote: §ñühwØ£f wrote in news ![]() On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 01:27:31 +0000, Bertie the Bunyip aided th' terraists with the following claims : Mxsmanic wrote in : §ñühwØ£f writes: I would a55ume that they have planes in the air at some point and the aircraft report the ceiling height of teh clouds and then they estimate windspeed from observaton stations on the ground. I'm just guessing. I knew a weather observer once. That makes sense. I wonder how they estimate things like heights and distances, though. I suppose experience would help to come up with educated guesses for these, but one might still be way off. Certainly experience would be useful in recognizing specific cloud types and patterns. One article I read (I think it was Wikipedia) mentioned just ten radiosondes for the entire Caribbean, that's hardly what I'd call high-resolution measurement. You could almost fit a hurricane between radiosondes. You are an idiot. Bertie Maybe they use dopplar radar to tell the height of the clouds, eh? Otherwise I assume some sort of math involving triangulation and other difficult things. ![]() Nah, it's easy. They compare the temperature to the dewpoint add in th edry adiabatic lapse rate and voila, you get the cloudbase. Observation is used for terminal areas, otherwise, though, it's still done the old fashioned way for the most part. These days, al info is mixed together, whihc gives a much better actual and forecasting capability. bertie Are you an ex weather observer or summat? I had a friend who was ex USAF weather observer then he got a job in elko doing weather observation & moved ![]() He was always talking about clouds & stuff trying to explain what was happening up there... Nah,, I'm a pilot. We have to learn the basics of how it's done. It's interesting, but not riveting for me, anyhow. Handy to know a bit abou tit in my line of work, though. Sure, the basics; thats a funnel cloud, thats a hurricane, sheep arn't supposed to fly... -- "Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities" - Voltaire http://www.smirkingchimp.com/thread/16072 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Aviation Weather Services, AC 00-45F | Bob Gardner | Piloting | 1 | December 20th 07 02:58 AM |
Gliding Weather Services around the world | [email protected] | Soaring | 9 | May 3rd 07 09:42 AM |
AF#2/conditions | Christopher Range | Piloting | 11 | October 26th 06 02:57 AM |
National Weather Services Duties Act of 2005 | Rob | Piloting | 0 | September 7th 05 09:44 PM |
Deicing during heavy weather conditions | William W. Plummer | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | December 24th 04 01:12 PM |