Dumb Canard Question.

Barnyard BOb -- wrote in message . ..
Good point, and the "nose on the ground" approach is arguably the best
solution. Just a matter of preference I guess. I'd just rather not
park my plane with the nose on the ground.

Neal
++++++++++++++++++++++

Troublemaker.



Barnyard BOb --



Actually, the reason behind my post if the first place was to solicit
a response letting me know if my idea would work or not. I know it
may not be the BEST solution, but I thought it WOULD work. I have not
talked to any Velocity drivers, but from anything I've read about
them,( the plane...not the pilots ) they don't seem to have any bad
takeoff or landing traits, so I'm curios as to how they are able to
park their planes without their "noses on the ground" and still have
the good traits assuming their empty weight CG is so far ahead of the
main gear that prevents a backward "tip-over". I know that sounds
wordy, but I think you understand my question. Thanks

Neal
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Sure do, and....
I hope you understand my tongue in cheek
remark without me putting a smiley on it. g


Barnyard BOb --

I understood. Sometimes I come up with a " I wonder if this would
work " idea and I find the RAH group a good sounding board. I even
got a great physics lesson from a fellow poster the other day
regarding the construction of a wing spar. Great stuff..............

Neal