![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
SNIP Cooking group
"Peter Aitken" wrote in message news ![]() "A.T. Hagan" wrote in message om... (Polybus) wrote in message . com... Dear Friend, A committee of scholars, veterans, clergy, activists, students, and other interested individuals is now forming to challenge the Smithsonian's plans to exhibit the Enola Gay solely as a "magnificent technological achievement." GOOD. I'm glad to hear the Smithsonian has finally come to its senses and stopped acting ashamed of an important part of our national history that we have NO reason to be ashamed of. Unlike a good number of people who seem to be educated beyond their intelligence. Not that this topic has anything at all to do with rec.food.cooking which is where I read the thing. .....Alan. You and others are missing the point. If the B-29 is a "magnificent technological achievement" fine, display one. But why does it have to be the Enola Gay? That specific plane is unavoidable associated with dropping the A-bomb on a civilian target with all the resulting horrors. A "civilian target"? Now would be a good time to revisit the whole issue of "total war", within the context of the time this occurred (as opposed to trying to apply modern standards to it)...but I am sure it would be a waste of both your and my time. You may support the dropping of the bomb or you may be against it, but there's no denying that displaying *this* B-29 rather than another one makes the exhibit seem like a celebration of the bombing rather than the bomber. No matter how necessary and justified you think the bombing was, it is nothing to celebrate. I don't know. The guys in my dad's outfit (330th BG/314th BW) who were in the midst of conducting missions at the time thought it was well worth celebrating. As did a lot of ground troops who breathed a collective sight of relief when they found that Olympic/Coronet were not needed. Brooks Peter G. Aitken |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Kevin Brooks" wrote in message . .. I don't know. Of course. ![]() |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "Kevin Brooks" wrote in message . .. I don't know. Of course. ![]() Take a note, Tarvernaut. Not everyone around here claims to know everything; those like you who do just provide the laughs for the rest of us. Brooks |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Kevin Brooks" wrote in message . .. "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "Kevin Brooks" wrote in message . .. I don't know. Of course. ![]() Take a note, Tarvernaut. Not everyone around here claims to know everything; those like you who do just provide the laughs for the rest of us. I intentionally provide laughs for quite a few, get a clue. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|