![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 4, 12:03*pm, jeremy wrote:
wrote: For sure alcohol related road accidents have been reduced by more than half, thanks to organizations like MADD. There seems to a positive relationship between any level of serum alcohol and reaction times, but it gets to be serious enough to affect driving at the high 0.0X levels. But they have gone too far by making suspicion almost as bad as a conviction. The guilty until proven innocent does not apply and in Texas the cost of successfully defending against a prosecution is around $5k. JJ That sounds like the same kind of liberties Child Protective Services take in many states. I do think if you blow a 0.08 the presumptive assumption is you're DUI in most states. That kind of 'authority' is the same kind that mandates seat belts or helmets for bike riders. Sometimes I think the last two should be abolished and let Darwin do his thing, but DUI too often takes out other people too, and we the people need protection from that kind of reaping. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|