![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Morgans" wrote in message
... "Capt. Geoffrey Thorpe" The Sea Hawk @See My Sig.com wrote You betcha. Ain't no difference at all. Well, not exactly, there can be differences due to the abilitly to align the thrust axis with the CG, or the location of any control surfaces and their relation to the CG, or the location of the CG... But pendulum's have nothing to do with it. I'm not buying it. Ok, then can you explain, given the fact that: A: there is no one holding up on end of a rope B: Gravity will accelerate the entire jet pack / pilot assembly through the CG - unlike a pendulm where someone is holding one end. And C: The thrust points along the axis of the vehicle (not "up") where the force (moment) comes from that would tend to turn the vehicle upright once it has been tipped to one side. Yes, but if you tie a rope on it, to keep it from falling, it will hang down from the rope. Yea, if you hang it from a rope. But what happens when you let go of the rope. Ain't no rope here. Please explain wihhout the rope. (Hint - you can't) Don't take what I have said as a personal attack, but instead as a different viewpoint of the characteristics of the aircraft(?) being discussed. Same here - nothing personal. However, it's a matter of physics - not a viewpoint. If you try and draw a free body diagram to illustrate where you think the turning momemt comes from that would re-upright the jet pack thingie after it is tipped a bit, you will quickly find that there isn't any. -- Geoff The Sea Hawk at Wow Way d0t Com remove spaces and make the obvious substitutions to reply by mail When immigration is outlawed, only outlaws will immigrate. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Capt. Geoffrey Thorpe" The Sea Hawk @See My Sig.com wrote:
[ Explaining the pendulum fallacy: ] Same here - nothing personal. However, it's a matter of physics - not a viewpoint. If you try and draw a free body diagram to illustrate where you think the turning momemt comes from that would re-upright the jet pack thingie after it is tipped a bit, you will quickly find that there isn't any. Just FYI, there is a Wikipedia page dealing with this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pendulum_Rocket_Fallacy Which includes a link to a page that actually shows vector diagrams and gif graphics: http://www.geocities.com/jim_bowery/pendrock.html |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
P-61 belly gun pack | Dave Kearton | Aviation Photos | 0 | March 2nd 07 09:19 AM |
Power pack for camping? | LincTex | General Aviation | 2 | June 26th 06 12:40 PM |
Jet pack | Bob C | Soaring | 14 | January 12th 06 07:11 PM |
Jet pack | Bob C | Soaring | 0 | January 10th 06 07:21 AM |
Pack guns in your little airplane | Rich S. | Home Built | 17 | July 13th 03 05:45 PM |