How much fuel do you prefer to carry?

Ricky writes:

Anthony, NO, NO, NO! You do not have to fly exclusively by instruments
in IMC. There are often conditions IN LEGAL IMC where on flys by
visual reference.

Legally, you must be on instruments. The law isn't written that way just to
make life difficult for pilots.

You can always rely on instruments, even in the clearest weather. But you
cannot always rely on visual references. And if you are in IMC, you may only
be seconds away from a loss of visual references.

IFR DOES NOT mean "flying by instruments alone." You are wrong! Show
me where you learned this gibberish if you are so sure about it.

I'll quote you to the NTSB; that might make it easier for them to determine
probable cause after you're gone.

The reason they are disagreeing with you is because you are NOT a
pilot ...

The reason they are disagreeing with me is that their desire to prove me wrong
is so intense that it takes priority over their own safety. If they cannot
shake themselves free of this emotion, they will be a danger to themselves in
the air.

Mxsmanic wrote:
Ricky writes:

Anthony, NO, NO, NO! You do not have to fly exclusively by instruments
in IMC. There are often conditions IN LEGAL IMC where on flys by
visual reference.

Legally, you must be on instruments.

Care to quote the law or regulation that says you must be "on instruments"
whenever you are in IMC?


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

On Aug 13, 4:05*pm, wrote:
Mxsmanic wrote:
Ricky writes:
Anthony, NO, NO, NO! You do not have to fly exclusively by instruments
in IMC. There are often conditions IN LEGAL IMC where on flys by
visual reference.
Legally, you must be on instruments.

Care to quote the law or regulation that says you must be "on instruments"
whenever you are in IMC?

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

Whoa, please be careful. The above looks like I, Ricky, am the one who
said that ("Legally, you must be on instruments.")
I did not say that, our resident IFR expert Anthony did, and it most
certainly is wrong. By the way you did not trim the post/reply it
looks like I said it.
Trimming posts properly here seems to be oft ignored or done
incorrectly.

Ricky

Ricky wrote:
On Aug 13, 4:05?pm, wrote:
Mxsmanic wrote:
Ricky writes:
Anthony, NO, NO, NO! You do not have to fly exclusively by instruments
in IMC. There are often conditions IN LEGAL IMC where on flys by
visual reference.
Legally, you must be on instruments.

Care to quote the law or regulation that says you must be "on instruments"
whenever you are in IMC?

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

Whoa, please be careful. The above looks like I, Ricky, am the one who
said that ("Legally, you must be on instruments.")
I did not say that, our resident IFR expert Anthony did, and it most
certainly is wrong. By the way you did not trim the post/reply it
looks like I said it.
Trimming posts properly here seems to be oft ignored or done
incorrectly.

The attributions are automatic and follow the RFC's.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

writes:

The attributions are automatic ...

So are autopilots, but the FAA says that you're still PIC.

Mxsmanic wrote:
writes:

The attributions are automatic ...

So are autopilots, but the FAA says that you're still PIC.

Thank you Mr. State The Obvious.

You got a statement correct, so now you've "won" and can go away
proud of your accomplishment.

Too bad you snipped the rest of the quote which made your comment
a non sequitur.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

wrote in :

Mxsmanic wrote:
writes:

The attributions are automatic ...

So are autopilots, but the FAA says that you're still PIC.

Thank you Mr. State The Obvious.

You got a statement correct, so now you've "won" and can go away
proud of your accomplishment.

Too bad you snipped the rest of the quote which made your comment
a non sequitur.



Standard Anthony Atkielski tactic.

writes:

Care to quote the law or regulation that says you must be "on instruments"
whenever you are in IMC?

This is a bit like asking for a law that prohibits you from grabbing live
wires and electrocuting yourself. Why do you exhibit this adversarial
attitude towards instrument flight?

You can often depart SVFR in poor weather, but just because you aren't
absolutely required to be IFR doesn't mean that SVFR is a smart idea. If you
want to fly in marginal weather conditions, get an instrument rating instead
of gambling on technicalities; you'll live longer.

Mxsmanic wrote:
writes:

Care to quote the law or regulation that says you must be "on instruments"
whenever you are in IMC?

This is a bit like asking for a law that prohibits you from grabbing live
wires and electrocuting yourself. Why do you exhibit this adversarial
attitude towards instrument flight?

You're the one that said legally you must be on instruments whenever
you are in IMC.

Where's the reg to back up that statement or did you just make it up?


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

On Aug 13, 9:56*pm, Mxsmanic wrote:

You can often depart SVFR in poor weather, but just because you aren't
absolutely required to be IFR doesn't mean that SVFR is a smart idea. *

Oh, no! Now you are going to attempt to educate us on SVFR? THIS is
going to be good!
Anthony, you are digging a really, really deep hole for yourself, boy!

Ricky