![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 13, 3:55*pm, Mxsmanic wrote:
writes: If visibility is 4.5 miles, you are by defininition in IMC. Are you always solely on instruments, or is there any reason to be on instruments at all, with a visibility of 4.5 miles? If you're in IMC, you need to be on instruments. *At 4.5 miles, you're only 60-90 seconds away from not being able to see anything. *Are you ready for that? Hard experience has taught the aviation industry that just being clear of low-visibility weather isn't enough; you have to keep a safety margin between you and that weather. *That means that you have to be on instruments once you're inside that margin. *If you wait until you really can't see anything, it might be too late, especially if you are unprepared. Are you always solely on instruments, or is there any reason to be on instruments at all, with a visibility of 2.5 miles? If you're in IMC, you need to be on instruments. *In IMC, instruments become your final reference, no matter what you see out the window. *When visibility drops, instruments are your exclusive reference, no matter what you feel. You are, in this thread, at an intellectual and experience disadvantage. You asserted a requirement to be in instruments in IMC: that is wrong. EVERY current instrument rated pilot does transitions between reference to instruments and outside reference. We do it on take off, en route, on approach, and on the miss in actual. That you don't understand that, that it is outside your experience, does not make it not true. You have typed yourself into a corner, and now are looking for a way to regain some creditability, and it is not working. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 13, 10:45*pm, Mxsmanic wrote:
writes: EVERY current instrument rated *pilot does transitions between reference to instruments and outside reference. When did the discussion become limited to IR pilots? *Most pilots in this newsgroup rather obviously do not have instrument ratings, if one can judge by what they claim about IMC and IFR. You were the one making definitive statements about flight in IMC, and you are clearly not knowledgeable. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
... On Aug 13, 10:45 pm, Mxsmanic wrote: writes: EVERY current instrument rated pilot does transitions between reference to instruments and outside reference. When did the discussion become limited to IR pilots? Most pilots in this newsgroup rather obviously do not have instrument ratings, if one can judge by what they claim about IMC and IFR. One can NOT. You were the one making definitive statements about flight in IMC, and you are clearly not knowledgeable. -- Regards, BobF. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
One More Reason I Prefer GA | Kyle Boatright | Piloting | 19 | December 27th 06 11:53 PM |
Is it a habit we prefer mechnical instruments? | [email protected] | Home Built | 80 | April 28th 06 04:05 AM |
Does V-22 Go Twices as Far, carry Twice as Much? | Nick Lappos | Rotorcraft | 26 | October 12th 05 08:11 PM |
Headset wanted - prefer David Clark | Marty from Sunny Florida | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | October 5th 04 02:54 PM |
things to carry | Gary Drescher | Piloting | 62 | July 20th 04 03:08 AM |