How much fuel do you prefer to carry?

Ricky writes:

You don't have to be proven wrong. You simply ARE wrong. Why can't you
accept that from of a bunch of IFR pilots with thousands of hours?

Most pilots here are not instrument rated, and some of those who are are more
interested in scoring points against me in a one-sided game than in following
the path of safety. I will not yield to this, so there's no sense in trying
it.

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Ricky writes:

You don't have to be proven wrong. You simply ARE wrong. Why can't
you accept that from of a bunch of IFR pilots with thousands of
hours?

Most pilots here are not instrument rated, and some of those who are
are more interested in scoring points against me in a one-sided game
than in following the path of safety. I will not yield to this, so
there's no sense in trying it.


Translation: I, Anthony Atkielski, am a ****ing moron and damn proud of
it!

On Aug 14, 3:59*am, Benjamin Dover wrote:
Mxsmanic wrote :

Ricky writes:

You don't have to be proven wrong. You simply ARE wrong. Why can't
you accept that from of a bunch of IFR pilots with thousands of
hours?

Most pilots here are not instrument rated, and some of those who are
are more interested in scoring points against me in a one-sided game
than in following the path of safety. *I will not yield to this, so
there's no sense in trying it.

Translation: *I, Anthony Atkielski, am a ****ing moron and damn proud of
The other aspect of his personality is last-word-itis. Don't you
really enjoy getting tutorials from a non pilot recluse living in a
hovel in Paris? It isn't that wisdom can't come from such a location,
but this particular fountain doesn't offer wisdom, but self gratifying
babble.

We do give him attention, though, so that justifies his postings.

I'll follow viperdoc's suggestion though, and attempt to ignore him
for a while. Exchanges are no longer entertaining.