![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "tankfixer" wrote in message ... In article , says... "tankfixer" wrote in message ... Pointing out that shooting weapons into the air in an area with insugents around is a bad idea is blaming the victims ? If you're dropping bombs on weddings the implication is thst there's nobody on the ground shouting 'don't shoot, it's a wedding'. If your shooting into the air with aircraft around the implication is you are trying to hit somebody. Or celebrating something... In that case they're not insurgents, they're the local government... Before they were just innocent civvilians, why the change ? Is English not your native language? -- William Black I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Barbeques on fire by the chalets past the castle headland I watched the gift shops glitter in the darkness off the Newborough gate All these moments will be lost in time, like icecream on the beach Time for tea. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "tankfixer" wrote in message ... In article , says... "tankfixer" wrote in message ... In article , says... "tankfixer" wrote in message ... Pointing out that shooting weapons into the air in an area with insugents around is a bad idea is blaming the victims ? If you're dropping bombs on weddings the implication is thst there's nobody on the ground shouting 'don't shoot, it's a wedding'. If your shooting into the air with aircraft around the implication is you are trying to hit somebody. Or celebrating something... Would you care to be in the aircraft at night and have to make the decision ? There are 2 issues here. The first is, the bombing(s) of a wedding party was a terrible error. Given. The Americans don't bomb innocent civilians intentionally. The second issue is, that doesn't make the people - Pakistanis - like you more, even when they know that. - nilita |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article NBMpk.8108$nu6.4118@edtnps83,
says... "tankfixer" wrote in message ... In article , says... "tankfixer" wrote in message ... In article , says... "tankfixer" wrote in message ... Pointing out that shooting weapons into the air in an area with insugents around is a bad idea is blaming the victims ? If you're dropping bombs on weddings the implication is thst there's nobody on the ground shouting 'don't shoot, it's a wedding'. If your shooting into the air with aircraft around the implication is you are trying to hit somebody. Or celebrating something... Would you care to be in the aircraft at night and have to make the decision ? There are 2 issues here. The first is, the bombing(s) of a wedding party was a terrible error. Given. The Americans don't bomb innocent civilians intentionally. Our friend has been claiming it is policy. A most absurd statement IMHO. The second issue is, that doesn't make the people - Pakistanis - like you more, even when they know that. I'd imagine it wouldn't make anyone happy. I've yet to see a solution suggested though. -- War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse. The person who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made so and kept so by the exertions of much better men than himself. John Stuart Mill (1806 - 1873) English economist and philosopher. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "tankfixer" wrote in message ... In article NBMpk.8108$nu6.4118@edtnps83, says... "tankfixer" wrote in message ... In article , says... "tankfixer" wrote in message ... In article , says... "tankfixer" wrote in message ... Pointing out that shooting weapons into the air in an area with insugents around is a bad idea is blaming the victims ? If you're dropping bombs on weddings the implication is thst there's nobody on the ground shouting 'don't shoot, it's a wedding'. If your shooting into the air with aircraft around the implication is you are trying to hit somebody. Or celebrating something... Would you care to be in the aircraft at night and have to make the decision ? There are 2 issues here. The first is, the bombing(s) of a wedding party was a terrible error. Given. The Americans don't bomb innocent civilians intentionally. Our friend has been claiming it is policy. A most absurd statement IMHO. It is indeed an absurd statement. The second issue is, that doesn't make the people - Pakistanis - like you more, even when they know that. I'd imagine it wouldn't make anyone happy. I've yet to see a solution suggested though. A solution to ... what? Here's the deal. It is what it is. American foreign policy gets instituted and we get into the cause-and-effect thingy. Americans generally don't have a good idea as to how they are perceived by "furriners". I imagine most Americans don't care or would tend to think that the "furriner" thinking is wrong. Generally speaking, the Pakistanis hate you. However, most (conservative) Americans would like to believe that they ("the Pakis") are all lining up for Green Cards to run 7/11s in Michigan. Is it any wonder the world is in the state it is? - nilita |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article HCNpk.8112$nu6.3256@edtnps83,
says... "tankfixer" wrote in message ... In article NBMpk.8108$nu6.4118@edtnps83, says... "tankfixer" wrote in message ... In article , says... "tankfixer" wrote in message ... In article , says... "tankfixer" wrote in message ... Pointing out that shooting weapons into the air in an area with insugents around is a bad idea is blaming the victims ? If you're dropping bombs on weddings the implication is thst there's nobody on the ground shouting 'don't shoot, it's a wedding'. If your shooting into the air with aircraft around the implication is you are trying to hit somebody. Or celebrating something... Would you care to be in the aircraft at night and have to make the decision ? There are 2 issues here. The first is, the bombing(s) of a wedding party was a terrible error. Given. The Americans don't bomb innocent civilians intentionally. Our friend has been claiming it is policy. A most absurd statement IMHO. It is indeed an absurd statement. The second issue is, that doesn't make the people - Pakistanis - like you more, even when they know that. I'd imagine it wouldn't make anyone happy. I've yet to see a solution suggested though. A solution to ... what? Here's the deal. It is what it is. American foreign policy gets instituted and we get into the cause-and-effect thingy. Americans generally don't have a good idea as to how they are perceived by "furriners". I imagine most Americans don't care or would tend to think that the "furriner" thinking is wrong. Generally speaking, the Pakistanis hate you. However, most (conservative) Americans would like to believe that they ("the Pakis") are all lining up for Green Cards to run 7/11s in Michigan. You were doing ok until you got sophmoric about Pakistani's and 7/11's. Is it any wonder the world is in the state it is? What solution to you propose ? -- War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse. The person who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made so and kept so by the exertions of much better men than himself. John Stuart Mill (1806 - 1873) English economist and philosopher. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here's the deal. *It is what it is. *American foreign policy gets instituted
and we get into the cause-and-effect thingy. *Americans generally don't have a good idea as to how they are perceived by "furriners". *I imagine most Americans don't care or would tend to think that the "furriner" thinking is wrong. *Generally speaking, the Pakistanis hate you. *However, most (conservative) Americans would like to believe that they ("the Pakis") are all lining up for Green Cards to run 7/11s in Michigan. They'd also line up in Sangatte if they can, it's got nothing to do with trivial local political sensibilities, or whether they like you or not. Their mindset is that of the dust bowl, survive. Read Steinbeck or live in a place you can't even trust your drinking water.for a while. Is it any wonder the world is in the state it is? I assume you are thinking it is in a sad state? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "La N" wrote in message news:HCNpk.8112$nu6.3256@edtnps83... "tankfixer" wrote in message Our friend has been claiming it is policy. A most absurd statement IMHO. It is indeed an absurd statement. So why are they still bombing weddings? -- William Black I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Barbeques on fire by the chalets past the castle headland I watched the gift shops glitter in the darkness off the Newborough gate All these moments will be lost in time, like icecream on the beach Time for tea. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "William Black" wrote in message ... "La N" wrote in message news:HCNpk.8112$nu6.3256@edtnps83... "tankfixer" wrote in message Our friend has been claiming it is policy. A most absurd statement IMHO. It is indeed an absurd statement. So why are they still bombing weddings? Are you suggesting that Americans bomb weddings because they don't like weddings? What are they getting out of bombing weddings besides bad p.r.? - nilita |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
William Black wrote:
"La N" wrote in message news:HCNpk.8112$nu6.3256@edtnps83... "tankfixer" wrote in message Our friend has been claiming it is policy. A most absurd statement IMHO. It is indeed an absurd statement. So why are they still bombing weddings? Because Muslims still have not learnt that guns are not toys. Andrew Swallow |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lieberman calls on Rumsfeld to resign | Leadfoot | Naval Aviation | 27 | August 26th 06 04:34 PM |
resign commission for warrant officer questions | 1LT 15B in AH-64D | Military Aviation | 31 | June 23rd 04 04:21 AM |
Rumsfeld Must Resign | WalterM140 | Military Aviation | 1 | May 13th 04 08:24 PM |
Resign, B000$$$$hhhhhh!! | Grantland | Military Aviation | 1 | April 11th 04 08:02 AM |
Assassination Attempt on Musharraf Fails | Dav1936531 | Military Aviation | 0 | December 16th 03 05:31 AM |