A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Viable alternatives for serious aviation discussion



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 20th 08, 03:41 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Tim[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 25
Default Viable alternatives for serious aviation discussion

"Jay Honeck" wrote

Yet, you stay here. I can only conclude that you enjoy abuse...


Nah, that's not it. I conclude he enjoys the affect he has on some people
and what it drives them to do and say.


  #2  
Old August 20th 08, 04:09 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jay Honeck[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 943
Default Viable alternatives for serious aviation discussion

Yet, you stay here. I can only conclude that you enjoy abuse...

Nah, that's not it. I conclude he enjoys the affect he has on some people
and what it drives them to do and say.


Hmmm....good point. I must confess, it *is* kind of funny/pathetic to watch
how effortlessly he can jerk around pilots who are otherwise (apparently)
logical, even-tempered folks...
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
Ercoupe N94856
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"

  #3  
Old August 20th 08, 05:33 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Viable alternatives for serious aviation discussion

Jay Honeck writes:

Hmmm....good point. I must confess, it *is* kind of funny/pathetic to watch
how effortlessly he can jerk around pilots who are otherwise (apparently)
logical, even-tempered folks...


I take care to be nice and civil, but I do not engage in the kind of
mollycoddling that some people require in order to stay calm. If they cannot
stand direct, objective discussion, that's their problem, not mine. I do not
have the time or inclination to hold the hands of people who insist on
behaving like children.
  #4  
Old August 20th 08, 05:56 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk
Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,735
Default Viable alternatives for serious aviation discussion

Mxsmanic wrote in
news
Jay Honeck writes:

Hmmm....good point. I must confess, it *is* kind of funny/pathetic
to watch how effortlessly he can jerk around pilots who are otherwise
(apparently) logical, even-tempered folks...


I take care to be nice and civil, but I do not engage in the kind of
mollycoddling that some people require in order to stay calm. If they
cannot stand direct, objective discussion, that's their problem, not
mine. I do not have the time or inclination to hold the hands of
people who insist on behaving like children.



You wouldn't know what direct objective discusssion was if it blew you.


Bertie
  #5  
Old August 21st 08, 12:13 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Abbott
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 25
Default Viable alternatives for serious aviation discussion


"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
news
Jay Honeck writes:

Hmmm....good point. I must confess, it *is* kind of funny/pathetic to
watch
how effortlessly he can jerk around pilots who are otherwise (apparently)
logical, even-tempered folks...


I take care to be nice and civil, but I do not engage in the kind of
mollycoddling that some people require in order to stay calm. If they
cannot
stand direct, objective discussion, that's their problem, not mine. I do
not
have the time or inclination to hold the hands of people who insist on
behaving like children.


Then how do you stand yourself?


  #6  
Old August 20th 08, 04:22 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
The Bunyip Slayer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 26
Default Viable alternatives for serious aviation discussion


"Tim" wrote in message
...
"Jay Honeck" wrote

Yet, you stay here. I can only conclude that you enjoy abuse...


Nah, that's not it. I conclude he enjoys the affect he has on some people
and what it drives them to do and say.



Ding!
Ding!
Ding!
Ding!
Ding!
Ding!
Ding!

Looks like we have a winner!

Anthony is NOT here to talk aviation.

Back in high school, when we wanted to bed Mary Jane Rottencrotch, we didn't
just walk up and say hey, wanna screw?

Neither does Mx. It that respect, he does prove himself much smarter than
many of the "pilots" here, everyday. Are you listening Dudley?


  #7  
Old August 20th 08, 04:40 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Tim[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 25
Default Viable alternatives for serious aviation discussion

"The Bunyip Slayer" luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote
Looks like we have a winner!

Anthony is NOT here to talk aviation.

Back in high school, when we wanted to bed Mary Jane Rottencrotch, we

didn't
just walk up and say hey, wanna screw?

Neither does Mx. It that respect, he does prove himself much smarter than
many of the "pilots" here, everyday. Are you listening Dudley?


Dudley isn't the problem - I have never seen Dudley respond in any manner
other than to provide an answer to a question. That's what this NG is
supposed to be about after all.

OTOH, there are dozens of posters who go back and forth with the guy
endlessly, eventually resorting to childish name calling and similar
behavior presumably out of frustration. Tell me, how does that help?



  #8  
Old August 20th 08, 05:54 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk
Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,735
Default Viable alternatives for serious aviation discussion

"Tim" wrote in
:

"The Bunyip Slayer" luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote
Looks like we have a winner!

Anthony is NOT here to talk aviation.

Back in high school, when we wanted to bed Mary Jane Rottencrotch, we

didn't
just walk up and say hey, wanna screw?

Neither does Mx. It that respect, he does prove himself much smarter
than many of the "pilots" here, everyday. Are you listening Dudley?


Dudley isn't the problem - I have never seen Dudley respond in any
manner other than to provide an answer to a question. That's what
this NG is supposed to be about after all.

OTOH, there are dozens of posters who go back and forth with the guy
endlessly, eventually resorting to childish name calling and similar
behavior presumably out of frustration. Tell me, how does that help?



Well, for starters, your presumption is incorrect.



Bertie





  #9  
Old August 20th 08, 06:14 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk
Tim[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 25
Default Viable alternatives for serious aviation discussion

"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote

Well, for starters, your presumption is incorrect.


You are the exception and appear to be in it for the sport.


  #10  
Old August 21st 08, 12:12 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Abbott
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 25
Default Viable alternatives for serious aviation discussion


"Tim" wrote in message
...
"The Bunyip Slayer" luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote
Looks like we have a winner!

Anthony is NOT here to talk aviation.

Back in high school, when we wanted to bed Mary Jane Rottencrotch, we

didn't
just walk up and say hey, wanna screw?

Neither does Mx. It that respect, he does prove himself much smarter than
many of the "pilots" here, everyday. Are you listening Dudley?


Dudley isn't the problem - I have never seen Dudley respond in any manner
other than to provide an answer to a question. That's what this NG is
supposed to be about after all.


Oh, you mean like this one?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dudley Henriques"
Newsgroups: rec.aviation.piloting
Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2008 8:03 AM
Subject: RAP is NOT Dead


Morgans wrote:
"Dudley Henriques" wrote

Look in the mirror you idiot! YOU'RE the problem!!!!


I never mentioned you or your view of things, so why don't you trying to
STFU for a change?


You ****ing moron. Are you SO stupid you don't realize that I have
NEVER, and I repeat it again for clarity.....NEVER, posted directly to
you on this issue unless posted on and lectured to BY you!!!

This post you're answering now is the direct result of you posting to me
last light lecturing me on how I should behave. I've had it with you!

No. I've been listening to your bull**** long enough. You picked the
wrong guy to pontificate on this time. I'm sick of you and your bull****
Morgans. I'll be reminding you you're the problem until you stop being
the problem.

--
Dudley Henriques








OTOH, there are dozens of posters who go back and forth with the guy
endlessly, eventually resorting to childish name calling and similar
behavior presumably out of frustration. Tell me, how does that help?


Anything to discourage the *******, and it does work for weeks at a time,
until you newbees come along and take pity on him.

Go ahead, get in there an work him. You see, everyone usually does.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sonex Kitplane as a viable aircraft for Sportsman aerobatic contests [email protected] Aerobatics 0 April 24th 08 04:16 PM
Aviation magazine - 100LL alternatives Not Me[_2_] Home Built 1 June 15th 07 02:04 AM
PDA mounting alternatives Jack Glendening Soaring 15 October 14th 05 08:03 PM
SWR meter Alternatives c hinds Home Built 1 June 2nd 04 07:39 PM
Commanche alternatives? John Cook Military Aviation 99 March 24th 04 03:22 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.