A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

How much fuel do you prefer to carry?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 24th 08, 01:45 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,892
Default How much fuel do you prefer to carry?

Bob F. wrote:


wrote in message
news
Bob F. wrote:
"george" wrote in message
...
On Aug 24, 12:03 am, "Bob F." wrote:

Instead of asking more questions, please answer him directly? That
is:
"Name an aircraft that will be overweight with a full load of fuel even
with
only the required pilot(s) aboard."


Let's see
Two morbidly obese pilots in a C152.
There are some 300 pound plus people out there


I don't think the C152 requires 2 pilots and we are talking about
standard
pilot weights. Can you think of a correct answer?


"Standard pilot weight" wasn't part of the original discussion.
--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.


...and we weren't talking about "two morbidly obese pilots" either.


OK, since you asked and not a certain other person...

First the ground rule: we are talking about the real world.

Take the Titan Tornado I which has a full fuel payload of 315 lb.

That's for the factory built airplane with nothing other than the
basic stuff required to fly.

Home builts almost never come out under weight and are almost allways
over the factory numbers when finished.

Let's say it is only 15 lb over the factory numbers and we are down
to 300 lb.

Add a nav/com, panel mount GPS, antennas, wiring, circuit breakers,
etc. to make it usefull and throw in position and strobe lights so
the thing is visible on hazy days, a few other options like the vent
kit, stabilizor and stabilator tips, electrical system to run the
avionic and you can easily add another 50 lb.

Now you are down to 250 lb.

Fully dressed to fly and before breakfast, holding my flight bag with
all the junk like the backup handheld, headset, spare batteries, charts,
etc. I weight 250 lb and according to my doctor am about 15 lb over what
my weight should be, so we're not talking about a morbidly obese pilot.

So, all I need to do is have a three egg omelete for breakfast and
a cup of coffee and I would be over max gross in this airplane.

I am by no means the heaviest pilot I know nor is the Tornado the only
airplane with a payload of only a few hundred pounds.

However, this whole discussion is pointless to the orignal subject of
off loading payload to be under gross.

Often offloading payload is not an option.

Not to mention most wives and girlfriends would object to being called
payload, not that mx would know anything about wives or girlfriends.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.
  #2  
Old August 24th 08, 02:08 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bob F.[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18
Default How much fuel do you prefer to carry?



wrote in message
...
Bob F. wrote:


wrote in message
news
Bob F. wrote:
"george" wrote in message
...
On Aug 24, 12:03 am, "Bob F." wrote:

Instead of asking more questions, please answer him directly? That
is:
"Name an aircraft that will be overweight with a full load of fuel
even
with
only the required pilot(s) aboard."


Let's see
Two morbidly obese pilots in a C152.
There are some 300 pound plus people out there


I don't think the C152 requires 2 pilots and we are talking about
standard
pilot weights. Can you think of a correct answer?

"Standard pilot weight" wasn't part of the original discussion.
--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.


...and we weren't talking about "two morbidly obese pilots" either.


OK, since you asked and not a certain other person...

First the ground rule: we are talking about the real world.

Take the Titan Tornado I which has a full fuel payload of 315 lb.

That's for the factory built airplane with nothing other than the
basic stuff required to fly.

Home builts almost never come out under weight and are almost allways
over the factory numbers when finished.

Let's say it is only 15 lb over the factory numbers and we are down
to 300 lb.

Add a nav/com, panel mount GPS, antennas, wiring, circuit breakers,
etc. to make it usefull and throw in position and strobe lights so
the thing is visible on hazy days, a few other options like the vent
kit, stabilizor and stabilator tips, electrical system to run the
avionic and you can easily add another 50 lb.

Now you are down to 250 lb.

Fully dressed to fly and before breakfast, holding my flight bag with
all the junk like the backup handheld, headset, spare batteries, charts,
etc. I weight 250 lb and according to my doctor am about 15 lb over what
my weight should be, so we're not talking about a morbidly obese pilot.

So, all I need to do is have a three egg omelete for breakfast and
a cup of coffee and I would be over max gross in this airplane.

I am by no means the heaviest pilot I know nor is the Tornado the only
airplane with a payload of only a few hundred pounds.

However, this whole discussion is pointless to the orignal subject of
off loading payload to be under gross.

Often offloading payload is not an option.

Not to mention most wives and girlfriends would object to being called
payload, not that mx would know anything about wives or girlfriends.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.


Good response. although we have not identified an aircraft the satisfies the
question since items were added in your real world scenario that preclude
this." No problem. I understand your answer.

--
Regards, Bob F.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
One More Reason I Prefer GA Kyle Boatright Piloting 19 December 27th 06 11:53 PM
Is it a habit we prefer mechnical instruments? [email protected] Home Built 80 April 28th 06 04:05 AM
Does V-22 Go Twices as Far, carry Twice as Much? Nick Lappos Rotorcraft 26 October 12th 05 08:11 PM
Headset wanted - prefer David Clark Marty from Sunny Florida Aviation Marketplace 0 October 5th 04 02:54 PM
things to carry Gary Drescher Piloting 62 July 20th 04 03:08 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.