Experimentals To Be Banned To Rural Airports?

In article niZuk.186$Af3.141@trnddc06,
"Mike Isaksen" wrote:

"Capt. Geoffrey Thorpe" wrote in message...
That was some thread a while ago. Someone was convinced
that living at an airpark was something like a suicide attempt.
Data to the contrary was dismissed as obviously wrong because
living near a runway was pre-determined to be dangerous.


Yeah, and the originator of that thread claimed to be a "real estate
developer with aviation interest". I read that as: the fox says to the
chickens "just passing thru".

How about "a fox with an interest in chickens?"

--
Remove _'s from email address to talk to me.

In article ,
Gezellig wrote:

On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 20:16:46 -0400, Orval Fairbairn wrote:

In article ,
Gezellig wrote:

On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 10:31:17 -0700, Tom C wrote:

Now you have this guy who hates GA and the clueless people who were
sold a bill of goods by developers that encroached on an airport that's
been
there since WW II and we have one melting ball of wax.

In another thread I was reading about the hazards of airparks. The
discussion were adamant about that not being the case yet here I have
this opinion stated three or four times in this thread. Care to comment?

HUH???? What hazards of airparks? There has been nothing in this thread
about it!

What hazards? Get serious, air parks like any other airfield have
hazards.

Just like roads, parking lots, water buckets, bicycles, frozen salmon...

on 8/31/2008 9:57 PM Demon Lord Benedict Snodgrass Jr of Confusion said
the following:
On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 04:24:08 +0000, Bertie the Bunyip attempted to confuse
the issue further by squeaking:
Demon Lord Benedict Snodgrass Jr of Confusion wrote:
On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 01:16:30 +0000, Bertie the Bunyip attempted to
confuse the issue further by squeaking:
"Ramsey" wrote:
"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote...
Demon Lord Benedict Snodgrass Jr of Confusion wrote:
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 14:22:17 +0000, Bertie the Bunyip attempted to
confuse the issue further by squeaking:
"Ramsey" wrote:
"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote...
"Ramsey" wrote:

You may wait. I have nothing to prove..

Well on the way to that next award, Maxie.
Still hat dancing there Buttlipps, prove I'm not a pilot.
Don't have to.

That's your job.

It's one of the few things you're good at.
I believe Maxwell is not a pilot, and that he is flat-out lying when
he says he is.
He never says he is, he just waffles.
Liar.
Are you saying that you have, at some point, declared yourself to be a
pilot, Maxine?

See?
I believe I do.
Teh ones that never get are the mostest funnest.

He's not good with making firm statements of fact about himself, is he?

Not since he couldn't get concrete vendors to deliver to him. They must
have heard what a **** he is.

On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 18:24:23 -0700, Rich Ahrens wrote these lies, denials,
arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or obfuscations:
on 8/31/2008 9:57 PM Demon Lord Benedict Snodgrass Jr of Confusion said
the following:
On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 04:24:08 +0000, Bertie the Bunyip attempted to
confuse the issue further by squeaking:
Demon Lord Benedict Snodgrass Jr of Confusion wrote:
On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 01:16:30 +0000, Bertie the Bunyip attempted to
confuse the issue further by squeaking:
"Ramsey" wrote:
"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote...
Demon Lord Benedict Snodgrass Jr of Confusion wrote:
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 14:22:17 +0000, Bertie the Bunyip attempted to
confuse the issue further by squeaking:
"Ramsey" wrote:
"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote...
"Ramsey" wrote:

You may wait. I have nothing to prove..

Well on the way to that next award, Maxie.
Still hat dancing there Buttlipps, prove I'm not a pilot.
Don't have to.

That's your job.

It's one of the few things you're good at.
I believe Maxwell is not a pilot, and that he is flat-out lying
when he says he is.
He never says he is, he just waffles.
Liar.
Are you saying that you have, at some point, declared yourself to be a
pilot, Maxine?

See?
I believe I do.
Teh ones that never get are the mostest funnest.

He's not good with making firm statements of fact about himself, is he?

Not since he couldn't get concrete vendors to deliver to him. They must
have heard what a **** he is.

I doubt he's a good ****, either.

--
__________________________________________________ ______________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; Anonymous Psycho Criminal #18
TEH USENETS BULLIE
http://www.runescape.com/
Join my RuneScape clan!
http://z11.invisionfree.com/Holy_Pre...abal/index.php
Full name of clan: Cabal of the Holy International Discordian Internet
And Usenet Terrorist Pretzel

Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life
http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/

Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, June 2008
Hammer of Thor, July 2008

"Not supporting me is equivalent to forfeiting your own rights." --
John D. Wentzky: Warrior For Your Freedumb! Message-ID:


"You cognatatively challenged fool!" -- According to Agamemnon, Stephen
Wilson is, apparently, highly ignorant about cognates, and so is anyone
who dares to disagree with him, in Message-ID:


"Is it still necrophilia if I'm conscious?" -- Owen Harper, "Dead Man
Walking", Torchwood (20/207)

On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 16:19:12 -0700, Tom C wrote:

"Gezellig" wrote in message
...

this opinion stated three or four times in this thread. Care to comment?

HUH???? What hazards of airparks? There has been nothing in this thread
about it!

What hazards? Get serious, air parks like any other airfield have
hazards.

Golf developments have more.

Tom "F*&^%$g sand traps" C

More? OK, at least there is a consensus that airparks, as golf courses,
are hazardous.

As I look back on the thread about this subject, I see the same sorts of
blinded airpark enthusiasm. What I find from "Living With Your Plane"
and many other rationale discussions is the admittance to the hazards.

On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 18:21:53 -0700, Steve Hix wrote:

In article ,
Gezellig wrote:

On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 20:16:46 -0400, Orval Fairbairn wrote:

In article ,
Gezellig wrote:

On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 10:31:17 -0700, Tom C wrote:

Now you have this guy who hates GA and the clueless people who were
sold a bill of goods by developers that encroached on an airport that's
been
there since WW II and we have one melting ball of wax.

In another thread I was reading about the hazards of airparks. The
discussion were adamant about that not being the case yet here I have
this opinion stated three or four times in this thread. Care to comment?

HUH???? What hazards of airparks? There has been nothing in this thread
about it!

What hazards? Get serious, air parks like any other airfield have
hazards.

Just like roads, parking lots, water buckets, bicycles, frozen salmon...

Correct.

"Rich Ahrens" wrote in message
ouse.com...

Not since he couldn't get concrete vendors to deliver to him. They must
have heard what a **** he is.


Good sock! Keep digging wanna be, maybe Uncle Gertie will promote you to
super suck.

"Zebulon" @###@.^net wrote in :


"Rich Ahrens" wrote in message
ouse.com...

Not since he couldn't get concrete vendors to deliver to him. They
must have heard what a **** he is.


Good sock! Keep digging wanna be, maybe Uncle Gertie will promote you
to super suck.



Don't worry, your job is secure.


Bertie

In article ,
Gezellig wrote:

On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 16:19:12 -0700, Tom C wrote:

"Gezellig" wrote in message
...

this opinion stated three or four times in this thread. Care to comment?

HUH???? What hazards of airparks? There has been nothing in this thread
about it!

What hazards? Get serious, air parks like any other airfield have
hazards.

Golf developments have more.

Tom "F*&^%$g sand traps" C

More? OK, at least there is a consensus that airparks, as golf courses,
are hazardous.

As I look back on the thread about this subject, I see the same sorts of
blinded airpark enthusiasm. What I find from "Living With Your Plane"
and many other rationale discussions is the admittance to the hazards.

WRONG!

What you see is people acknowledging risks associated with any endeavor
-- not specifically airparks. There is nothing to suggest any additional
hazard due to airparks. In fact, the presence of hangar space should
reduce hazards, due to lower environmental degradation than planes
exposed to the elements.

You will find your share of doofuses in any activity -- especially when
shaving or brushing your teeth.

--
Remove _'s from email address to talk to me.

on 9/2/2008 7:07 AM Zebulon said the following:
"Rich Ahrens" wrote in message
ouse.com...
Not since he couldn't get concrete vendors to deliver to him. They must
have heard what a **** he is.


Good sock! Keep digging wanna be, maybe Uncle Gertie will promote you to
super suck.

There may come a day in the distant future when you'll finally learn
what a sock is. Not counting on it, though, Good lord, you're dense.