Too Old?

In rec.aviation.owning Gezellig wrote:
On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 21:55:06 GMT, wrote:

And some aren't Dudley neither of which is the point. The point is that
Fed/FAA gets aggressive, age could come into question regardless. For
that matter, why not a local port like Vegas throwing up their own
rules?

Because local airports can't make special rules just for them that are
contrary to FAA rules.

--
Jim Pennino

Good point. I wonder, are there any potential local, non FAA regs that
could workaround this ?

Are you familiar with the terms "Supremacy Clause" and "Federal Preemption"?


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 20:55:05 GMT, wrote:

In rec.aviation.owning Gezellig wrote:
On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 21:55:06 GMT, wrote:

And some aren't Dudley neither of which is the point. The point is that
Fed/FAA gets aggressive, age could come into question regardless. For
that matter, why not a local port like Vegas throwing up their own
rules?

Because local airports can't make special rules just for them that are
contrary to FAA rules.

--
Jim Pennino

Good point. I wonder, are there any potential local, non FAA regs that
could workaround this ?

Are you familiar with the terms "Supremacy Clause" and "Federal Preemption"?

I'm familiar with "we don't rent airplanes to over 70s" which would be a
potential workaround the FAA.

In rec.aviation.owning Gezellig wrote:
On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 20:55:05 GMT, wrote:

In rec.aviation.owning Gezellig wrote:
On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 21:55:06 GMT, wrote:

And some aren't Dudley neither of which is the point. The point is that
Fed/FAA gets aggressive, age could come into question regardless. For
that matter, why not a local port like Vegas throwing up their own
rules?

Because local airports can't make special rules just for them that are
contrary to FAA rules.

--
Jim Pennino

Good point. I wonder, are there any potential local, non FAA regs that
could workaround this ?

Are you familiar with the terms "Supremacy Clause" and "Federal Preemption"?

I'm familiar with "we don't rent airplanes to over 70s" which would be a
potential workaround the FAA.

Apples and oranges.

What a private business does within the framework of discrimination
laws is entirely up to the private business.

The FBO may not rent to over 70 (never heard of such a thing in airplanes),
but the airport certainly can't ban over 70.

If anyone cared to press the point, I doubt that such practices by car
rental agencies would stand a court test.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

writes:

Are you familiar with the terms "Supremacy Clause" and "Federal Preemption"?

The mayor of Chicago seemed to have no problem with supremacy or preemption.
He destroyed an airport overnight and nothing happened, proving that anyone
can get away with it.

In rec.aviation.owning Mxsmanic wrote:
writes:

Are you familiar with the terms "Supremacy Clause" and "Federal Preemption"?

The mayor of Chicago seemed to have no problem with supremacy or preemption.
He destroyed an airport overnight and nothing happened, proving that anyone
can get away with it.

Wrong yet again.

The city was fined the maximum amount allowed at the time (the maximum
has since been increased from $1,100/day to $10,000/day) for closing
the airport without the required 30 day notice (the closing was legal,
the timing was not) as well as investigated for misappropriation of FAA
funds because of the early closing and had to repay over $1 million.

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

writes:

The city was fined the maximum amount allowed at the time (the maximum
has since been increased from $1,100/day to $10,000/day) for closing
the airport without the required 30 day notice (the closing was legal,
the timing was not) as well as investigated for misappropriation of FAA
funds because of the early closing and had to repay over $1 million.

So when did the airport reopen? Does the mayor pay the fines out of his
pocket?

In rec.aviation.owning Mxsmanic wrote:
writes:

The city was fined the maximum amount allowed at the time (the maximum
has since been increased from $1,100/day to $10,000/day) for closing
the airport without the required 30 day notice (the closing was legal,
the timing was not) as well as investigated for misappropriation of FAA
funds because of the early closing and had to repay over $1 million.

So when did the airport reopen? Does the mayor pay the fines out of his
pocket?

What part of the airport was already scheduled to be closed are you
having trouble understanding?

If you had stayed awake in high school civics you would know that
the governmental body is responsible for the actions of it's officials.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

On Sep 3, 10:49*pm, Mxsmanic wrote:
writes:
The city was fined the maximum amount allowed at the time (the maximum
has since been increased from $1,100/day to $10,000/day) for closing
the airport without the required 30 day notice (the closing was legal,
the timing was not) as well as investigated for misappropriation of FAA
funds because of the early closing and had to repay over $1 million.

So when did the airport reopen? *Does the mayor pay the fines out of his
pocket?

Its use has expanded:

"GOOD CAUSES: To help launch Children's Memorial Hospital's biggest-
ever fund-raising campaign at Northerly Island tonight, hospital
supporters will be entertained by an all-star lineup, including Tony
Award winner Heather Headley, former Styx mainstay Dennis DeYoung and
blues god Buddy Guy -- with Mary Ann Childers serving as the lucky
emcee. ... "