A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Too Old?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 22nd 08, 04:25 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt,rec.aviation.owning,rec.aviation.piloting
Mick[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 584
Default Too Old?

Howard Jones aka "Stealth Pilot" wrote in
message ...
| On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 22:48:11 +0000 (UTC), David Lesher
| wrote:
|
|
|
| The age of the aircraft in the GA field worries me more than
| that of the pilots...
|
| age is nothing but a number.
|
| fatigue is the worry and it usually arrives numberless (randomly)
|
| Stealth Pilot

Sounds like the voice of experience, Howard. That's what happens when guys
like you get over the hill.



  #2  
Old September 3rd 08, 01:49 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt,rec.aviation.owning,rec.aviation.piloting
Morgans[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,924
Default Too Old?


"John Godwin" wrote

I have a Special Issuance wherein the FAA required documentation from
each of my two physicians. My Medical Group charges nearly $100 per
"official" letter and then there's the AME fee. I felt that a little
under $300 each year was a tad much at this time so it may well be
that it's time to hang up the spurs or do other flying alternatives.


Go find you a sexy little experimental homebuilt that fits in the Light
Sport class.

No more medicals!
--
Jim in NC


  #3  
Old September 3rd 08, 03:20 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt,rec.aviation.owning,rec.aviation.piloting
Lonnie[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 164
Default Too Old?


"Morgans" wrote in message
...

"John Godwin" wrote

I have a Special Issuance wherein the FAA required documentation from
each of my two physicians. My Medical Group charges nearly $100 per
"official" letter and then there's the AME fee. I felt that a little
under $300 each year was a tad much at this time so it may well be
that it's time to hang up the spurs or do other flying alternatives.


Go find you a sexy little experimental homebuilt that fits in the Light
Sport class.

No more medicals!
--
Jim in NC


I'm hoping when my time comes, to find a sexy little female copilot.


  #4  
Old September 3rd 08, 04:08 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt,rec.aviation.owning,rec.aviation.piloting
Mike[_22_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 466
Default Too Old?

"Lonnie" @_#~#@.^net wrote in message
...

"Morgans" wrote in message
...

"John Godwin" wrote

I have a Special Issuance wherein the FAA required documentation from
each of my two physicians. My Medical Group charges nearly $100 per
"official" letter and then there's the AME fee. I felt that a little
under $300 each year was a tad much at this time so it may well be
that it's time to hang up the spurs or do other flying alternatives.


Go find you a sexy little experimental homebuilt that fits in the Light
Sport class.

No more medicals!
--
Jim in NC


I'm hoping when my time comes, to find a sexy little female copilot.


First you'll have to finish puberty and obtain a credit card. Good luck,
Okie.

  #5  
Old September 3rd 08, 06:57 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt,rec.aviation.owning,rec.aviation.piloting
Mike Isaksen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 242
Default Too Old?

"Mike" wrote ...
"Lonnie" wrote ...
"Morgans" wrote ...
Go find you a sexy little experimental homebuilt that fits in
the Light Sport class. No more medicals!


I'm hoping when my time comes, to find a sexy little female copilot.


First you'll have to finish puberty and obtain a credit card.
Good luck, Okie.


I wish I could do puberty again. Rather zits & squeaky voice than all my
hair falling out. ;-)

Hey Mike, neat trick re-routing all Group replys into "alt.usenet.kooks".
Kinda gives you last word on everything. Not very friendly though.


  #6  
Old September 3rd 08, 08:31 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt,rec.aviation.owning,rec.aviation.piloting
Mike[_22_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 466
Default Too Old?

"Mike Isaksen" wrote in message
news:BeAvk.444$jE1.168@trnddc03...
"Mike" wrote ...
"Lonnie" wrote ...
"Morgans" wrote ...
Go find you a sexy little experimental homebuilt that fits in
the Light Sport class. No more medicals!

I'm hoping when my time comes, to find a sexy little female copilot.


First you'll have to finish puberty and obtain a credit card.
Good luck, Okie.


I wish I could do puberty again. Rather zits & squeaky voice than all my
hair falling out. ;-)

Hey Mike, neat trick re-routing all Group replys into "alt.usenet.kooks".
Kinda gives you last word on everything. Not very friendly though.


Seeing as how Maxie is a kook that never has anything to offer this NG, can
you think of a better place for his posts?

  #7  
Old September 3rd 08, 05:04 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt,rec.aviation.owning,rec.aviation.piloting
Gezellig
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 463
Default Too Old?

On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 17:29:39 -0400, Dudley Henriques wrote:

Considering present regulations, the engine to implement such a plan
would be extremely difficult to design and push through the required
legislation.


Can't argue with this, don't have the expertise.


You're doing well :-))


lol
  #8  
Old September 3rd 08, 11:35 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt,rec.aviation.owning,rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Too Old?

Dudley Henriques writes:

This is the basis for what I have envisioned as a "plan" to shorten the
period between physicals as a pilot ages.


The intervals should not be based on age; they should based on the results of
the previous medical exam.

In other words, someone who is on the borderline but passes at one point
should have another medical at an earlier date than someone who passes the
medical with nothing to be concerned about.

Age is largely irrelevant. There's no point in a medical every 90 days for a
person who is 80 years old if he passes each of the medicals with flying
colors. Conversely, a 20-year-old who just barely squeaks by the medical with
some borderline condition should have another medical fairly soon. The
interval could be adjusted after each medical as a function of how the medical
turns out, with the date of the following medical being advanced or postponed
as appropriate.

That would be a truly representative and rational way to schedule medicals,
and there's no need for any age barriers at all.
  #9  
Old September 3rd 08, 01:14 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt,rec.aviation.owning,rec.aviation.piloting
Viperdoc[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 86
Default Too Old?

You obviously know nothing about the process, since you have never had a
medical and never will. Go look up special issuance.



  #10  
Old September 3rd 08, 04:45 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt,rec.aviation.owning,rec.aviation.piloting
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,892
Default Too Old?

In rec.aviation.owning Mxsmanic wrote:
Dudley Henriques writes:

This is the basis for what I have envisioned as a "plan" to shorten the
period between physicals as a pilot ages.


The intervals should not be based on age; they should based on the results of
the previous medical exam.

In other words, someone who is on the borderline but passes at one point
should have another medical at an earlier date than someone who passes the
medical with nothing to be concerned about.

Age is largely irrelevant. There's no point in a medical every 90 days for a
person who is 80 years old if he passes each of the medicals with flying
colors. Conversely, a 20-year-old who just barely squeaks by the medical with
some borderline condition should have another medical fairly soon. The
interval could be adjusted after each medical as a function of how the medical
turns out, with the date of the following medical being advanced or postponed
as appropriate.

That would be a truly representative and rational way to schedule medicals,
and there's no need for any age barriers at all.


I guess that would make sense to someone who has no idea how the current
system works.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.