![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"paul kgyy" wrote in message
... ATC: airplane 67Z, "traffic westbound at your 2 o'clock, 5000 feet" Now, if I see the traffic, it's "airplane 67Z has the traffic" Actually the correct phrase is "airplane 67Z traffic in sight", although few controllers are going to care either way. What if I don't have it visually, but it shows up on my traffic display? I've heard stuff like "yep, got 'im on the fishfinder" but I'm wondering if there is a standard "official" response? there's also the thought that if you don't have it visually, you don't really "have it" - i.e. the electronic display does not provide as good separation info as actually seeing the traffic with your Mark 1 eyeball. As has already been posted, the pilot-controller glossary will usually have the answer to these types of questions. Another excellent publication to keep by the commode is the ATC order 7110.65. Although it's certainly not required reading for pilots, it's very handy to have because with it you can also see what may be coming next. http://www.faa.gov/airports_airtraff.../media/ATC.pdf For instance, when the controller issues traffic, and you have the traffic in sight, one thing you can include is... "airplane 67Z traffic in sight, will maintain visual separation". The reason is because if you don't include it, the next instruction from the controller might be "maintain visual separation" and you will have to acknowledge that instruction. So it makes both of your jobs easier by including it in your first response. Personally I dearly love to use the phrase, "got 'im on the fishfinder" because it's just one of those very cool pilot phrases that scores you points with just about everyone. Everyone that is except the controller who will find it about as welcome as a fart in church. The controller has without a doubt heard it quite a few times so the novelty has long since worn off and it conveys no useful information to them. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Air Traffic/Pilot Terminology | [email protected] | Piloting | 32 | July 24th 07 10:25 AM |
VFR terminology in Class B | Matt | Piloting | 17 | February 27th 07 03:55 PM |
Pressure Altitude and Terminology | Icebound | Piloting | 0 | November 27th 04 09:14 PM |
New Aviation Terminology | DeltaDeltaDelta | Piloting | 45 | December 4th 03 08:31 AM |
Humour: CO DATA PAGE TERMINOLOGY CAT:BTN SUB:DES PGE:TRM | Dave Kearton | Military Aviation | 0 | September 24th 03 10:38 AM |