![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think the hand control is one of the most attractive features of the
ClearNav. I flew for several years with a Borgelt B100, and later a B2000, with the remote control velcroed to the top of left side of the seat pan where my left hand rested. It was a perfectly natural and intuitive arrangement that was far easier and steadier to use than either a touch screen or controls around the screen - both of which I use at present. It was also easy to route the cable neatly to it. There was never any need to look at the control - the hand quickly learns the functions. John Galloway At 16:38 15 September 2008, Udo Rumpf wrote: I disagree strongly, the controls should be clustered around the screen. The remote is just an other piece of hardware attached to a wire flying around the cockpit. Naturally I can see and understand your bias. There are products that function much closer to my way of thinking and I am not bias. See http://www.triadis.ch Udo I find the ClearNav's keypad to be very easy to use. Also, the ClearNav is very much designed with "simple user-interface" as a key design consideration. I think it succeeds at that goal superbly. I predict that there will be many more ClearNav units sold than "Ultimate" systems. Also, NK is a first class company that will be creating many very nice soaring instruments in the near future and they (and I) will support the ClearNav extremely well. But I'm biased because I sell, support and am writing the |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I predict the ultimate interface will be voice control not keypads or
trackballs. Voice already works on cellphones and in cars. With more processing power will work fine in gliders. I can also predict that the most common installation in 5 years will be an open system using off the shelf hardware running soaring specific software of the user's choice - just like the PDA systems we now use. The difference will be bigger, more readable screens and more processing power running more sophisticated software. LED backlight LCD monitors are already available in the 1500 - 2000 nit brightness range which makes them very readable in direct sunlight. These are likely to completely replace the CCFL backlights now common due to their comparatively low power requirements. 8" OLED screens are due 'soon' which will do a better job on even less power. "Electronic Paper" displays use almost no power and are as readable as a newspaper in direct sunlight but their response time needs to improve by 2 - 3 times. I predict a very usable 8" screen will cost less than $300. VIA Pico ITX and Intel Atom motherboards already offer plenty of processing power in matchbox sizes. The price of SSD mass storage is in free fall. Imagine a desktop PC shrunk to matchbox size running on a couple of LiFePo4 D batteries. Its the classic Mac vs PC vs Linux debate. There will be a minority which doesn't like to fiddle with configurations and will buy closed systems. The rest of us will buy open systems because they are cheaper, give us a wider choice and can be updated more easily. I run free software on a $100 used PDA. My only gripe is that the screen is too small and dim. My scheme is to use a thin screen over a rectangular panel of old round instruments with the screen hinged at the top. If the computer goes kaput, I'd just lift the screen and use the old instruments hidden behind it. "Udo Rumpf" wrote in message ... I disagree strongly, the controls should be clustered around the screen. The remote is just an other piece of hardware attached to a wire flying around the cockpit. Naturally I can see and understand your bias. There are products that function much closer to my way of thinking and I am not bias. See http://www.triadis.ch Udo I find the ClearNav's keypad to be very easy to use. Also, the ClearNav is very much designed with "simple user-interface" as a key design consideration. I think it succeeds at that goal superbly. I predict that there will be many more ClearNav units sold than "Ultimate" systems. Also, NK is a first class company that will be creating many very nice soaring instruments in the near future and they (and I) will support the ClearNav extremely well. But I'm biased because I sell, support and am writing the |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As far as I can see the Triadis is an open "off the shelf components" based product.
It has a hardware specific version of XCsoar loaded on it, to use the control buttons. However it is opensource software , which is by definition user customisable. About as good as it gets. Regrettably I understand it will not fit in many panels. Bruce Bill Daniels wrote: I predict the ultimate interface will be voice control not keypads or trackballs. Voice already works on cellphones and in cars. With more processing power will work fine in gliders. I can also predict that the most common installation in 5 years will be an open system using off the shelf hardware running soaring specific software of the user's choice - just like the PDA systems we now use. The difference will be bigger, more readable screens and more processing power running more sophisticated software. LED backlight LCD monitors are already available in the 1500 - 2000 nit brightness range which makes them very readable in direct sunlight. These are likely to completely replace the CCFL backlights now common due to their comparatively low power requirements. 8" OLED screens are due 'soon' which will do a better job on even less power. "Electronic Paper" displays use almost no power and are as readable as a newspaper in direct sunlight but their response time needs to improve by 2 - 3 times. I predict a very usable 8" screen will cost less than $300. VIA Pico ITX and Intel Atom motherboards already offer plenty of processing power in matchbox sizes. The price of SSD mass storage is in free fall. Imagine a desktop PC shrunk to matchbox size running on a couple of LiFePo4 D batteries. Its the classic Mac vs PC vs Linux debate. There will be a minority which doesn't like to fiddle with configurations and will buy closed systems. The rest of us will buy open systems because they are cheaper, give us a wider choice and can be updated more easily. I run free software on a $100 used PDA. My only gripe is that the screen is too small and dim. My scheme is to use a thin screen over a rectangular panel of old round instruments with the screen hinged at the top. If the computer goes kaput, I'd just lift the screen and use the old instruments hidden behind it. "Udo Rumpf" wrote in message ... I disagree strongly, the controls should be clustered around the screen. The remote is just an other piece of hardware attached to a wire flying around the cockpit. Naturally I can see and understand your bias. There are products that function much closer to my way of thinking and I am not bias. See http://www.triadis.ch Udo I find the ClearNav's keypad to be very easy to use. Also, the ClearNav is very much designed with "simple user-interface" as a key design consideration. I think it succeeds at that goal superbly. I predict that there will be many more ClearNav units sold than "Ultimate" systems. Also, NK is a first class company that will be creating many very nice soaring instruments in the near future and they (and I) will support the ClearNav extremely well. But I'm biased because I sell, support and am writing the |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill Daniels wrote:
I run free software on a $100 used PDA. My only gripe is that the screen is too small and dim. Has anyone tried one of those ruggedized PDAs in the cockpit, like the TDS Recon. In theory it fixes the too dim problem. http://www.tdsway.com/products/recon |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Bill,
I just searched the TDS page below looking for any indication that the screen is sunlight readable and I couldn't find anything. Perhaps I missed it. What gives you the impression that it is brighter than any other PDA? Paul Remde "Greg O'Sullivan" wrote in message u... Bill Daniels wrote: I run free software on a $100 used PDA. My only gripe is that the screen is too small and dim. Has anyone tried one of those ruggedized PDAs in the cockpit, like the TDS Recon. In theory it fixes the too dim problem. http://www.tdsway.com/products/recon |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Clear Yaw string tape? | Bruno | Soaring | 42 | August 30th 13 05:56 PM |
Clear Air Turbolance | Dutch | Aviation Photos | 1 | May 3rd 07 05:31 PM |
"Clear Prop!" in Mandarin | Darkstar | Piloting | 18 | November 25th 04 09:09 PM |
when does a "remain clear" instruction end? | Arden Prinz | Piloting | 171 | March 2nd 04 12:26 AM |
This post will clear a lot of things up | Jack White | Military Aviation | 0 | September 14th 03 10:52 AM |