![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "pervect" wrote in message ... On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 08:21:03 GMT, "Kevin Brooks" wrote: That is a decent description of the selective availability (SA) function of GPS. SA renders the average (non-US military) receiver incapable of determining a precise fix, and you need precision for the kind of weapons the poster was postulating. SA was shut down a couple of years back so that civil users (i.e., surveyors, commercial aircraft, etc.) could take advantage of its precision (prior to that occuring surveyors had to use what is known as "differential GPS", a more time consuming method of achieving a precise location), but according to the official USG website on the subject it can be reinstituted over a particular region at will. Denying the US use of GPS would have a negative impact on US military capability, but it would not eliminate it. Actually, I don't think SA adversely affects US military systems. Brooks Processors and computing power are getting cheaper every year - and there are a lot of US weapons with military GPS around - so it's conceivable to me that someone could obtain one of these weapons and reverse-engineer the GPS system on them. They can, but the signal is encrypted. The military can change the key at will. In fact, I suspect that the keys are changed at least daily. Even if you know all about the lock, you won't get a thing if you don't have the key. If there is no sort of "auxiliary code input" to the weapon (i.e. some sort of activation code that has to be input) the reverse engineered weapons would work just as well as the US weapons, so the US would have to make the choice of whether it was better for everyone to have (accurate) GPS or nobody to have GPS. Without knowing for sure, I would personally expect that current weapons would have some sort of auxiliary code, and that this code would have to be entered as part of the target programming process (which is quite long according to news reports, though it's getting shorter). I'm sure it's a private key system. The US issues keys (probably 1k bits or more) to all units that need them. Contingency keys are also issued. If someone captures the keys for next month, the contingency keys are used. Ray Drouillard |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Australia F111 to be scrapped!! | John Cook | Military Aviation | 35 | November 10th 03 11:46 PM |