![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Reply in Line
wrote in message ... On Sep 19, 4:47 pm, Jerry Wass wrote: A friend of mine is contemplating seriously building a Double Eagle & has spotted what I think is a 2100cc transporter engine ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----------- Dear Jerry, There's no such thing as a 2100cc VW engine. The Type 4 engine, which was installed in Transporters imported to the US (most late-model Transporters did just fine with the upright 1600 engine) came in three sizes, 1800cc, 1900cc and 2000cc. Some had dual carbs. My used '73 van had a 1700cc which I changed to a 2000cc ASAP. The 2000cc was out of a fuel injected camper van and didn't have a mechanical fuel pump. The boss was there but wasn't machined for the pump. We installed an electric pump at the tank and a pressure regulator at the carburetor. (Progressive 2 brl). The Type 4 is an excellent engine but is an extremely poor choice for the Double Eagle due to its extra weight and limited parts availability. If converted for flight, the prop should be installed on the clutch-end of the crankshaft, a realatively easy mode since the crankshaft is flanged. But doing so would require the fabrication of an entirely new engine mount for the Double Eagle. According to Steve Bennett (ie, Great Plains) most of the folks building the Double Eagle are opting for the 2180cc engine. If the fellow can acquire the engine at little cost, he should do so. It represents a significant value as 'trading goods' since the core was also used in the VW-Porsche. The problem with putting the prop on the pulley-end of the crank is well documented and should be read carefully before risking your life on that particular modification. I don't consider myself qualified on the T4, never having had enough of them to experiment with. But with the exception of its valve train, the T4 is a fully modern engine which embodies all of the modifications defined in the HVX files (and found in ANY modern-day engine). The main problem with using it for flight is its weight and the need to blow it out -- stroker crank & bigger jugs -- to get the power you'll need to power a Sonex (for example). But properly overhauled, it will give a quarter-million miles of reliable service in the Transporter and makes good trading material. -R.S.Hoover |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Saturn V S-IC Stage Fuel Tank on Transporter 6519047.jpg | [email protected] | Aviation Photos | 0 | April 12th 07 01:32 AM |
Saturn I Booster (S-I Stage) on a Transporter 6029217.jpg | [email protected] | Aviation Photos | 0 | April 10th 07 09:58 PM |
NASA Apollo 6 Bird's-eye View of Apollo 6 on Transporter at KSC 9903402.jpg | [email protected] | Aviation Photos | 0 | April 10th 07 04:48 PM |
SAM-2 on a transporter in North Vietnam | Dave Kearton | Aviation Photos | 0 | March 2nd 07 01:06 AM |
Boeing 747 Space Shuttle Transporter | Jim | Piloting | 6 | August 22nd 05 12:40 AM |