![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
"Ashton Archer III" wrote in message Is it also true that the reason it won't fly is that modern flyers can't mimic the Wright brothers art of handling wing warp as good or that the conditions for modern flight HAVE to be better than in 1903? The replica is perhaps as close as one can get to the real thing. The original one hanging in the Smithsonian was itself patched up by the surviving Wright brother (forget which one) many years after the event from memory and with the thinking the aircraft would only be a display piece, as opposed to a template for a flying reproduction. But the bottom line: the Wright flyer is a *very* difficult airplane to fly! The Wrights had hours of flying time in similarly behaved gliders before the actual Flyer flight. These guys had become very good at handling an aircraft before a powered flight. Some modern pilots (AF, Navy and Test) have tried their hands at flying various Flyer reproductions over this and last year and haven't done too well. Basically, if you fly a Flyer for very long, you *are* going to crash, so it's no surprise that someone without equivalent flight time on the machine would have trouble even getting off the ground, even with favorable flying conditions for the airplane, that weren't present for the Dec 17 ceremonial attempt. SMH |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Stephen Harding" wrote in message ... Steven P. McNicoll wrote: ....nothing which appears below. If you're going to trim my words please trim my name as well. "Ashton Archer III" wrote in message Is it also true that the reason it won't fly is that modern flyers can't mimic the Wright brothers art of handling wing warp as good or that the conditions for modern flight HAVE to be better than in 1903? The replica is perhaps as close as one can get to the real thing. The original one hanging in the Smithsonian was itself patched up by the surviving Wright brother (forget which one) many years after the event from memory and with the thinking the aircraft would only be a display piece, as opposed to a template for a flying reproduction. But the bottom line: the Wright flyer is a *very* difficult airplane to fly! The Wrights had hours of flying time in similarly behaved gliders before the actual Flyer flight. These guys had become very good at handling an aircraft before a powered flight. Some modern pilots (AF, Navy and Test) have tried their hands at flying various Flyer reproductions over this and last year and haven't done too well. Basically, if you fly a Flyer for very long, you *are* going to crash, so it's no surprise that someone without equivalent flight time on the machine would have trouble even getting off the ground, even with favorable flying conditions for the airplane, that weren't present for the Dec 17 ceremonial attempt. SMH |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
"Stephen Harding" wrote in message ... Steven P. McNicoll wrote: ...nothing which appears below. If you're going to trim my words please trim my name as well. Indeed yes. Apologies. SMH |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Good plans-built Light Sport Aircraft | Rob Schneider | Home Built | 15 | August 19th 04 05:50 PM |
Free Volksplane to good home, located in Chino Hills CA | Bryan Zinn | Home Built | 3 | July 18th 04 02:55 AM |
bulding a kitplane maybe Van's RV9A --- a good idea ????? | Flightdeck | Home Built | 10 | September 9th 03 07:20 PM |
Commander gives Navy airframe plan good review | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | July 8th 03 09:10 PM |