757 avionics

On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 15:46:19 +0000, Mike wrote:

"FriarTuck" wrote in message
...
some questions if anyone knows the answers...

A better question is...

Why should anyone answer the questions of a troll who asks the same
questions using different sock puppets?

has it been asked and answered before? do you have a thread reference?
what newsgroup? around what date?

FriarTuck wrote in news:4trFk.4623$8T1.1260
@newsfe28.ams2:

On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 15:46:19 +0000, Mike wrote:

"FriarTuck" wrote in message
...
some questions if anyone knows the answers...

A better question is...

Why should anyone answer the questions of a troll who asks the same
questions using different sock puppets?

has it been asked and answered before? do you have a thread reference?
what newsgroup? around what date?


Look in the conspirawhacko groups, especially right after 9-11..

alt.conspiracy in particular, but also all of the aviation groups.
There's volumes on whether a 757 could be flown remotely and volumes of
explanations on why it couldn't be.





Bertie

On 3 Okt, 18:09, FriarTuck wrote:
On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 15:46:19 +0000, Mike wrote:
"FriarTuck" wrote in message
...
some questions if anyone knows the answers...

A better question is...

Why should anyone answer the questions of a troll who asks the same
questions using different sock puppets?

has it been asked and answered before?

The question as to whether the 757 is FBW or not certainly has been...
Why don't you ask them what diameter the turn Hanjour made was? Or try
and explain to them how it would have been impossible for him to have
flown it, even though you don't knwo what the diameter of the turn
was? Or how, if he had flown it, you feel he would have probably
entered a "graveyard turn" despite it being mid-morning on a CAVU
day?

wrote in news:dd1b41a5-1df4-49ca-9895-e7325985c9e3
@e2g2000hsh.googlegroups.com:

On 3 Okt, 18:09, FriarTuck wrote:
On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 15:46:19 +0000, Mike wrote:
"FriarTuck" wrote in message
...
some questions if anyone knows the answers...

A better question is...

Why should anyone answer the questions of a troll who asks the same
questions using different sock puppets?

has it been asked and answered before?

The question as to whether the 757 is FBW or not certainly has been...
Why don't you ask them what diameter the turn Hanjour made was? Or try
and explain to them how it would have been impossible for him to have
flown it, even though you don't knwo what the diameter of the turn
was? Or how, if he had flown it, you feel he would have probably
entered a "graveyard turn" despite it being mid-morning on a CAVU
day?



K00k alert!

Bertie

On 3 Okt, 18:31, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
wrote in news:dd1b41a5-1df4-49ca-9895-e7325985c9e3
@e2g2000hsh.googlegroups.com:



On 3 Okt, 18:09, FriarTuck wrote:
On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 15:46:19 +0000, Mike wrote:
"FriarTuck" wrote in message
...
some questions if anyone knows the answers...

A better question is...

Why should anyone answer the questions of a troll who asks the same
questions using different sock puppets?

has it been asked and answered before?

The question as to whether the 757 is FBW or not certainly has been...
Why don't you ask them what diameter the turn Hanjour made was? Or try
and explain to them how it would have been impossible for him to have
flown it, even though you don't knwo what the diameter of the turn
was? Or how, if he had flown it, you feel he would have probably
entered a "graveyard turn" despite it being mid-morning on a CAVU
day?

K00k alert!

Bertie

Absolutely...

On Oct 4, 4:20*am, wrote:

The question as to whether the 757 is FBW or not certainly has been...
Why don't you ask them what diameter the turn Hanjour made was? Or try
and explain to them how it would have been impossible for him to have
flown it, even though you don't knwo what the diameter of the turn
was? Or how, if he had flown it, you feel he would have probably
entered a "graveyard turn" despite it being mid-morning on a CAVU
day?

If you ignore the kook typeover messages this video was taken off a
kook site and shows a graphic of the socalled 'impossible' turn.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DzR-q0ijbV0
At no time does the turn exceed a slow descending rate 2 turn and is
generally a rate1 throughout !