![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() 5) When to turn: *This is still a big one for me. *I am developing a good "butt-meter" when it comes to detecting and centering lift when I'm flying along slowly or already circling. *At my typical cruise- speed of ~80 knots I find it MUCH harder! *Either I stop and turn for a big bump that isn't workable (just a gust or something ragged); or I blow through the lift by the time I realize its big enough to use, and I don't think its worthwhile to try to turn back around to find it. At least I know I'm not the only one who sometimes dolphin-flies and pulls up in the sink on the far side because of vario lag... **sigh* In my current thinking this is about the most important thing in contest success. Maybe the only thing. The good pilots find and center good lift. It all comes down to thermaling. When I do badly it is because I missed thermals that better pilots found. I write all these MacCready articles and such, but my big focus is just on going back to basics and thermaling better. By and large, you don't find lift at 80 kts dry (90+ wet). You slow down in the bumpy air that indicates there is a thermal around here somewhere, take S turns, sniff around like a dog looking for a hidden bone, (Forget all that Moffat mid 70s stuff about aerobatic thermal entries. That happens occasionally, but really rarely) LOOK LOOK LOOK out the window for cloud shapes, birds, chaff, gliders, or any other clue, and learn to recognize all those great feelings in your butt, You want to recognize the feeling that is a thermal, not a gust; to know that if you turn you will turn into increasing lift, and not the dreaded sink. You're trying not to ever go past 45 degrees off course unless you KNOW the lift will be there all the way around. Of course, you're rock steady in attitude control, thermaling at exactly the right airspeed. John Cochrane. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks all,
This may sound egotistical, but when I'm alone or with one or two other gliders I'm pretty confident my thermaling skills are above- average (I admit that I still need work in gaggles). I tend to circle a little bit faster than some folks (usually 48 - 50 knots in my DG-300), but I turn at a tight 45 - 50 degree bank angle - never less (narrow thermals here in the west). Doing the math on load factors at various bank-angles, and given my min-sink speed of about 42 knots, I think this thermaling speed may be about right (despite some "advice" that I should be circling slower). The glider certainly doesn't "groove" through the turns as well when I really try to slow it up and fly in the mid-to-lower 40's at these bank angles. BTW, I don't credit my climb capabilities to talent or anything; I just got started flying in a place where 1 - 2 knot lift was the norm, and cloudbases are typically around 3000'. If you want to get anywhere in those conditions, you *cannot* miss a climb or lose a thermal! I just got "Winning II" last night, and I'm glad to hear someone with John's experience discount Moffat's thermal entry technique. The vario swings due to TE compensation and the sudden/aerobatic thermal entry at 80+ knots seems like it would make it incredibly hard to judge what the thermal strength truly is (in addition to the safety issues if you rocket up farther than expected and wind up smack in the middle of a gaggle that's already circling). Oh, and unless I'm really low I _never_ make S turns and hunt. :-) I usually have 2 "targets" in mind when I set out on each inter-thermal glide; a primary thermal marker (or best guess) and a backup somewhere beyond it along my course-line. I try to only slow down and hunt if I hit bumps or other evidence of lift where I'm already expecting it at these target-points. But sometimes I feel like I've bypassed a good thermal along the way (perhaps better than the one I'll find at my target area). Like I said in my earlier post, occasionally I try for these "good bumps" - and get skunked most of the time. And the cost of slowing down, turning a circle (even just one) for no gain, and then speeding back up is just HUGE. I just don't know if the "cure" is to avoid circling at all in these situations, or if there are better ways to determine if the lift is big enough or good enough to work without actually throwing in a circle. Thanks for the tip on downloading race flights/IGC files. I've been meaning to do that, now its time I actually follow through! Take care, --Noel |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 11, 11:30*pm, "noel.wade" wrote:
Thanks all, This may sound egotistical, but when I'm alone or with one or two other gliders I'm pretty confident my thermaling skills are above- average (I admit that I still need work in gaggles). *I tend to circle a little bit faster than some folks (usually 48 - 50 knots in my DG-300), but I turn at a tight 45 - 50 degree bank angle - never less (narrow thermals here in the west). *Doing the math on load factors at various bank-angles, and given my min-sink speed of about 42 knots, I think this thermaling speed may be about right (despite some "advice" that I should be circling slower). *The glider certainly doesn't "groove" through the turns as well when I really try to slow it up and fly in the mid-to-lower 40's at these bank angles. *BTW, I don't credit my climb capabilities to talent or anything; I just got started flying in a place where 1 - 2 knot lift was the norm, and cloudbases are typically around 3000'. *If you want to get anywhere in those conditions, you *cannot* miss a climb or lose a thermal! I just got "Winning II" last night, and I'm glad to hear someone with John's experience discount Moffat's thermal entry technique. *The vario swings due to TE compensation and the sudden/aerobatic thermal entry at 80+ knots seems like it would make it incredibly hard to judge what the thermal strength truly is (in addition to the safety issues if you rocket up farther than expected and wind up smack in the middle of a gaggle that's already circling). Oh, and unless I'm really low I _never_ make S turns and hunt. :-) *I usually have 2 "targets" in mind when I set out on each inter-thermal glide; a primary thermal marker (or best guess) and a backup somewhere beyond it along my course-line. *I try to only slow down and hunt if I hit bumps or other evidence of lift where I'm already expecting it at these target-points. *But sometimes I feel like I've bypassed a good thermal along the way (perhaps better than the one I'll find at my target area). *Like I said in my earlier post, occasionally I try for these "good bumps" - and get skunked most of the time. *And the cost of slowing down, turning a circle (even just one) for no gain, and then speeding back up is just HUGE. I just don't know if the "cure" is to avoid circling at all in these situations, or if there are better ways to determine if the lift is big enough or good enough to work without actually throwing in a circle. Thanks for the tip on downloading race flights/IGC files. *I've been meaning to do that, now its time I actually follow through! Take care, --Noel Try this http://www.coloradosoaring.org/think...calculator.htm Frank |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Now if BB says you need to sniff around like a dog, you need to sniff
around like a dog. He gave you a book worth of advise and it went right over your head. First learn the pilot, and then ask yourself the right questions. Like why would a top racer advise to "sniff around like a dog"? The answer to that question started 56 miles back when he started his 351 L/D leg to a location that would produce good "huntin". And in this business, you ain't sh't unless you can "hunt". There are four other gems he put in there that require some study. Racing is easy. Racing good is a lucky day. Racing good consistently is simply rare talent. To advance to must get out on course and hope for such talent to come along to allow you draft in his magic, seeing for yourself what can be done. What you know now is only enough to get out on course. R |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Noel
John is right on thermalling techniques. Aerobatics are inefficient - Agreed. But if the question is - when I hit a thermal at 80kt what do I do? Then the only way to enter the thermal will be to pull hard to slow down while you are still in the lift. Here's a one time world champion having a difficult day. http://www.onlinecontest.org/olc-2.0...ghtId=43802292 Observe how Oscar looks for lift, and also how precise his flying is when he finds it. BB wrote: 5) When to turn: This is still a big one for me. I am developing a good "butt-meter" when it comes to detecting and centering lift when I'm flying along slowly or already circling. At my typical cruise- speed of ~80 knots I find it MUCH harder! Either I stop and turn for a big bump that isn't workable (just a gust or something ragged); or I blow through the lift by the time I realize its big enough to use, and I don't think its worthwhile to try to turn back around to find it. At least I know I'm not the only one who sometimes dolphin-flies and pulls up in the sink on the far side because of vario lag... *sigh* In my current thinking this is about the most important thing in contest success. Maybe the only thing. The good pilots find and center good lift. It all comes down to thermaling. When I do badly it is because I missed thermals that better pilots found. I write all these MacCready articles and such, but my big focus is just on going back to basics and thermaling better. By and large, you don't find lift at 80 kts dry (90+ wet). You slow down in the bumpy air that indicates there is a thermal around here somewhere, take S turns, sniff around like a dog looking for a hidden bone, (Forget all that Moffat mid 70s stuff about aerobatic thermal entries. That happens occasionally, but really rarely) LOOK LOOK LOOK out the window for cloud shapes, birds, chaff, gliders, or any other clue, and learn to recognize all those great feelings in your butt, You want to recognize the feeling that is a thermal, not a gust; to know that if you turn you will turn into increasing lift, and not the dreaded sink. You're trying not to ever go past 45 degrees off course unless you KNOW the lift will be there all the way around. Of course, you're rock steady in attitude control, thermaling at exactly the right airspeed. John Cochrane. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 22:33 11 October 2008, BB wrote:
In my current thinking this is about the most important thing in contest success. Maybe the only thing. The good pilots find and center good lift. It all comes down to thermaling. When I do badly it is because I missed thermals that better pilots found. I write all these MacCready articles and such, but my big focus is just on going back to basics and thermaling better. By and large, you don't find lift at 80 kts dry (90+ wet). You slow down in the bumpy air that indicates there is a thermal around here somewhere, take S turns, sniff around like a dog looking for a hidden bone, (Forget all that Moffat mid 70s stuff about aerobatic thermal entries. That happens occasionally, but really rarely) LOOK LOOK LOOK out the window for cloud shapes, birds, chaff, gliders, or any other clue, and learn to recognize all those great feelings in your butt, You want to recognize the feeling that is a thermal, not a gust; to know that if you turn you will turn into increasing lift, and not the dreaded sink. You're trying not to ever go past 45 degrees off course unless you KNOW the lift will be there all the way around. Of course, you're rock steady in attitude control, thermaling at exactly the right airspeed. John Cochrane. Once again Mr Cochrane gets right to the heart of things. Copy and paste the above to a preflight cockpit card. That is the underlying *cause* of the top pilots being so fast - one resultant *effect* of this is that they can afford to cruise faster, take fewer thermals and, when it is right to do so, go lower than the likes of me. George Moffat's brilliant, but IMHO much misunderstood, article on low loss flying article showed how one pilot could theoretically beat another substantially by using various optimisations of technique. However it often seems to be forgotten that the article was predicated on the stated assumption that the two contest pilots were flying equally optimal routes and climbing equally etc. For the learner a far bigger benefit comes from flying in the right place at the right time. John Galloway |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|