![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 13, 4:41*pm, "noel.wade" wrote:
On Oct 13, 4:25*pm, BB wrote: I'm guilty of being too obscure. A few years ago the US experimented with the following rule. To determine your speed for scoring, we take (Time + 15 minutes)/distance. Time still had to be greater than minimum time. The effect of this change is to offset the fact that you get one fast final glide, or equivalently one fee thermal to the top of the start gate, per flight, and therefore remove the critical importance of finishing close to the minimum time. For example, suppose you fly 50 mph through the air -- top of start gate to top of last thermal -- *and then *do a 15 minute, 100 mph final glide on a 2:00 hour turn area task. If you fly it perfectly and finish in two hours, you go (50 x 1.75 + *100 x 0.25 )/2 = 56.2 mph.. If you blow it and do a 2:30 flight, you go (50 x 1.25 + 100 x 0.25) / 2.5 = 55 mph * or 972 points. That is a huge difference in contest soaring, so no wonder pilots invest in thousands of dollars of computers. *If you add 15 minutes to each time, though, you get scored for 50 mph in each case! The 15 minute time addition exactly offsets the one- glide-per-flight effect and makes it unimportant how long you stay out, so long as you end above minium time and fly fast. I wish I could say that this was overturned by the evil conspiracy of flight computer manufacturers. Pilot confusion and poor salesmanship by its advocates *did in a very pretty idea. And I am not trying to revive it -- lost cause! John Cochrane OK, got it. *Not sure it works in all cases (though it worked OK in a few random-number cases I threw at it), but I understand it now. *My newbie brain works better when this is phrased "add 15 minutes at 0mph on to the end of your flight" (this also jives with your "free thermal" explanation, since if there's no wind your speed along the course is effectively zero when you're thermalling straight up). *shrug* Maybe I'm just weird. I still don't see how this changes the problem with people coming in under-time, if the raw time (before adding 15 minutes) still has to be greater than the minimum task time... BTW there's a little typo in your example numbers. *The longer-flight pilot spent 2.25 hours at 50mph, not 1.25. *:-) --Noel- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|