![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Damo" wrote:
:"Fred J. McCall" wrote in message .. . : "Damo" wrote: : : :A civilian is making a cruise missile in his garage in New Zealand for less : :then 5000 dollars. : : I'll believe it when he gets it done, it has a usable warhead : fraction, and it works after being bounced around on roads (and off) : in the back of a truck for six months. And if it passes that, then : we'll talk about flight profiles, RCS, accuracy under GPS-jammed : conditions, etc. : : Get back to me. : :I wasnt pretending this was military grade weapon (the GPS component rules :that out straight away) but if someone told you this 10 years ago you would :write it off completely. Really? I find that quite odd, since I remember George talking about how to build a rocket much more cheaply than we are STILL building them and didn't "write it off completely". I'm pretty sure that was more than 10 years ago. I do find the price tag pretty ludicrous, given that you can't buy a car for that kind of money. :With todays technology it is at least possible, and :for terrorists it doesnt have to meet your guidelines above - just hit :something in a city will do it. Using mortars off the shelf is easier and cheaper if your only goal is to lob some explosives into a city. -- "Death is my gift." -- Buffy, the Vampire Slayer |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Fred J. McCall wrote:
:I wasnt pretending this was military grade weapon (the GPS component rules :that out straight away) but if someone told you this 10 years ago you would :write it off completely. Really? I find that quite odd, since I remember George talking about how to build a rocket much more cheaply than we are STILL building them and didn't "write it off completely". I'm pretty sure that was more than 10 years ago. I started saying that more than 10 years ago now, yeah. There are now several other companies flying stuff in the price / performance / complexity range I was talking about, though I have not yet gotten full development funding for my project and didn't receive one of the DARPA FALCON project awards, though several of the others did. I do find the price tag pretty ludicrous, given that you can't buy a car for that kind of money. A lot of that is markup and costs associated with stuff that has nothing inherently to do with the structure or systems (interiors are not cheap). Car engines and drivetrains also cost a lot more than pulsejets do, cruise missile wings don't have to be structurally all that complicated, etc. People build homebuilt aircraft that are far larger and more complicated (other than guidance electronics) than our notional cruise missile for a thousand or two thousand hours work invested, using tools and technology that can be obtained in the bush in Rwanda if need be. If we assume the cruise missile is half that effort, that's five hundred to a thousand hours of effort. In a lot of countries, people get paid a couple of bucks an hour for reasonable tech-oriented labor. If you wanted to do this with a prop (or, ducted fan) there are two cycle aviation engines off the shelf in quantity one at $2k and down for low power, $4-5k and up some for about a hundred horsepower. The ducted fan / afterburner job used in the second generation, never used Kamizaze plane used a hundred horsepower engine and a wooden fan unit. The only cost center which runs the risk of running severely outside the budget is the computer and guidance hardware. The INS will be several thousand in quantity even if it's fiber optic gyros and MEMS accellerometers, if you're aiming for 10 meter inertial accuracy over those 200ish kilometers. The camera system engineering will not be trivial, though the camera itself may end up being very cheap (or cameras... CMOS cameras for $20 or less retail today means that some solutions may just be "buy more cameras"). The computer itself is trivial and off the shelf, even hardened for flight. The software is a sticky point but not as hard as some have made it out to be, other than the image-matching software. I believe that the image-matching problem is overstated here based on previous investigations I have done, but I am not a competent expert on that corner of the problem. -george william herbert |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Fred J. McCall" wrote in message ... "Damo" wrote: :"Fred J. McCall" wrote in message .. . : "Damo" wrote: : : :A civilian is making a cruise missile in his garage in New Zealand for less : :then 5000 dollars. : : I'll believe it when he gets it done, it has a usable warhead : fraction, and it works after being bounced around on roads (and off) : in the back of a truck for six months. And if it passes that, then : we'll talk about flight profiles, RCS, accuracy under GPS-jammed : conditions, etc. : : Get back to me. : :I wasnt pretending this was military grade weapon (the GPS component rules :that out straight away) but if someone told you this 10 years ago you would :write it off completely. Really? I find that quite odd, since I remember George talking about how to build a rocket much more cheaply than we are STILL building them and didn't "write it off completely". I'm pretty sure that was more than 10 years ago. Was that just a rocket or a cruise missile? Cheap GPS units are only a relative recent occurance although in the US you may have had $100 GPS units 10 years ago. I do find the price tag pretty ludicrous, given that you can't buy a car for that kind of money. Well actually you can buy cars for that amount of money, and quite complicated ones at that. A flying bomb is IMO much simpler - engine+computer+leading edges and servo units. Making it reliable and accurate is another thing entirely.... :With todays technology it is at least possible, and :for terrorists it doesnt have to meet your guidelines above - just hit :something in a city will do it. Using mortars off the shelf is easier and cheaper if your only goal is to lob some explosives into a city. If you want to escape launching something from 20-50km away is much better then 2-5km away. And more terrifying - imagine the media response: CRUISE MISSILE HITS NEW YORK! Damo -- "Death is my gift." -- Buffy, the Vampire Slayer |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Australia F111 to be scrapped!! | John Cook | Military Aviation | 35 | November 10th 03 11:46 PM |